RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      고령화사회의 인지연령과 기부의도에 관한 연구 = A Study on the Relationship between Donation Intention and Cognitive Age in an Aging Society

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103731541

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose – This research aims to understand the different behaviors of consumers according to cognitive age. Specifically, this research is focused on pro-social behavior. Pro-social behavior is defined as behavior benefiting others, rather than behavior benefiting one’s self. It often entails individual risk or cost, such as when giving resources to others, waiting in line, asking for or paying a fair price, or risking one’s life in battle.
      Therefore, we sought to understand consumer psychology and cognitive age as a reflection of inner psychology. People frequently perceive themselves as younger or older than their chronological ages. This self-perceived or cognitive age is a subjective age perception independent of actual chronological age. The discrepancy degree between chronological and cognitive age represents how much individuals perceive themselves as younger than they are. This study examines the gap in donation intention based on cognitive age. In order to investigate cognitive age, composed of four sub-categories (feel-age, look-age, do-age, and interest-age), this study explores the differential donation intention based on cognitive age, which determines the relationship between the young age and old age.
      Research design, data, and methodology – Data research was conducted by gathering 216 survey samples, excluding those with unreliable answers. Data coding and cleaning were used and SPSS 19.0 software for the data analysis. The respondents were categorized into two types, younger cognitive ages and older cognitive ages. Additionally, we analyzed the moderating variables. In particular, we used cognitive age degree and congruency level (cognitive age low vs. cognitive age high) x (congruency close vs. congruency distant) between - subjects design. First, regression was done to verify the difference between chronological age and cognitive age. Second, at-test was done to verify the difference of cognitive age level in donations. Third, ANOVA (analysis of variance) was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and congruency in donations. Last, ANOVA was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and moral judgments in donations.
      Result – The results show most respondents perceive themselves as younger than their chronological ages. In particular, older respondents feel they are younger than their actual age.
      Moreover, the result of the comparison between low degree and high degree groups of cognitive age, show high donations at the higher degree of cognitive age groups. In addition, the closer the distance to the beneficiaries, the higher the donation in high degree cognitive age groups. The higher moral judgment groups also show relatively high contributions in lower degree cognitive age groups.
      Conclusions – Donations belong to the category of pro-social behavior reflecting an individual’s psychological state. Therefore, it is important in understanding cognitive age. This study implies that it is necessary to take into account both cognitive age and chronological age when segmenting donors. Moreover, this study confirmed that there are different factors affecting the motives behind donations. Thus, it may be utilized to create differential donation strategies.
      번역하기

      Purpose – This research aims to understand the different behaviors of consumers according to cognitive age. Specifically, this research is focused on pro-social behavior. Pro-social behavior is defined as behavior benefiting others, rather than beha...

      Purpose – This research aims to understand the different behaviors of consumers according to cognitive age. Specifically, this research is focused on pro-social behavior. Pro-social behavior is defined as behavior benefiting others, rather than behavior benefiting one’s self. It often entails individual risk or cost, such as when giving resources to others, waiting in line, asking for or paying a fair price, or risking one’s life in battle.
      Therefore, we sought to understand consumer psychology and cognitive age as a reflection of inner psychology. People frequently perceive themselves as younger or older than their chronological ages. This self-perceived or cognitive age is a subjective age perception independent of actual chronological age. The discrepancy degree between chronological and cognitive age represents how much individuals perceive themselves as younger than they are. This study examines the gap in donation intention based on cognitive age. In order to investigate cognitive age, composed of four sub-categories (feel-age, look-age, do-age, and interest-age), this study explores the differential donation intention based on cognitive age, which determines the relationship between the young age and old age.
      Research design, data, and methodology – Data research was conducted by gathering 216 survey samples, excluding those with unreliable answers. Data coding and cleaning were used and SPSS 19.0 software for the data analysis. The respondents were categorized into two types, younger cognitive ages and older cognitive ages. Additionally, we analyzed the moderating variables. In particular, we used cognitive age degree and congruency level (cognitive age low vs. cognitive age high) x (congruency close vs. congruency distant) between - subjects design. First, regression was done to verify the difference between chronological age and cognitive age. Second, at-test was done to verify the difference of cognitive age level in donations. Third, ANOVA (analysis of variance) was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and congruency in donations. Last, ANOVA was done to verify the difference between cognitive age and moral judgments in donations.
      Result – The results show most respondents perceive themselves as younger than their chronological ages. In particular, older respondents feel they are younger than their actual age.
      Moreover, the result of the comparison between low degree and high degree groups of cognitive age, show high donations at the higher degree of cognitive age groups. In addition, the closer the distance to the beneficiaries, the higher the donation in high degree cognitive age groups. The higher moral judgment groups also show relatively high contributions in lower degree cognitive age groups.
      Conclusions – Donations belong to the category of pro-social behavior reflecting an individual’s psychological state. Therefore, it is important in understanding cognitive age. This study implies that it is necessary to take into account both cognitive age and chronological age when segmenting donors. Moreover, this study confirmed that there are different factors affecting the motives behind donations. Thus, it may be utilized to create differential donation strategies.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 황윤용, "젊은세대와 시니어세대간 기부의도에 관한 비교연구 - 심리적 거리와 도덕적 정체성의 조절효과를 중심으로 -" 한국경영학회 42 (42): 1715-1736, 2013

      2 박광희, "인지연령에 관한 선행연구 고찰" 한국의류산업학회 14 (14): 48-55, 2012

      3 홍성태, "인지연령: 소비행동에 미치는 영향 및 매개효과 분석" 한국소비자학회 18 (18): 63-86, 2007

      4 최성, "실버 제품의 거부감에 관한 연구 - 전동 휠체어를 통한 검증 -" 한국감성과학회 13 (13): 317-326, 2010

      5 최정원, "성인 여성의 주관적 연령과 의복쇼핑성향에 관한 연구" 한국복식학회 60 (60): 74-88, 2010

      6 정정호, "기부중단자의 특성 및 기부행위에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지연구회 (37) : 241-266, 2008

      7 부경희, "‘젊은 오빠’ 인식 : 인지연령(Cognitive Age) 인식이 노인세대의 소비행태에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국광고학회 16 (16): 37-66, 2005

      8 Montepare, J. M., "You're Only as Old as You Feel : Self-Perceptions of Age, Fears of Aging, and the Life Satisfaction from Adolescence to Old Age" 4 : 73-78, 1989

      9 Koschate-Fischer, N., "Willing to Pay for Cause-Related Marketing : The Impact of Donation Amount and Moderating Effects" 49 (49): 910-927, 2012

      10 Mount, J., "Why Donors Give" 7 (7): 3-14, 1996

      1 황윤용, "젊은세대와 시니어세대간 기부의도에 관한 비교연구 - 심리적 거리와 도덕적 정체성의 조절효과를 중심으로 -" 한국경영학회 42 (42): 1715-1736, 2013

      2 박광희, "인지연령에 관한 선행연구 고찰" 한국의류산업학회 14 (14): 48-55, 2012

      3 홍성태, "인지연령: 소비행동에 미치는 영향 및 매개효과 분석" 한국소비자학회 18 (18): 63-86, 2007

      4 최성, "실버 제품의 거부감에 관한 연구 - 전동 휠체어를 통한 검증 -" 한국감성과학회 13 (13): 317-326, 2010

      5 최정원, "성인 여성의 주관적 연령과 의복쇼핑성향에 관한 연구" 한국복식학회 60 (60): 74-88, 2010

      6 정정호, "기부중단자의 특성 및 기부행위에 관한 연구" 한국사회복지연구회 (37) : 241-266, 2008

      7 부경희, "‘젊은 오빠’ 인식 : 인지연령(Cognitive Age) 인식이 노인세대의 소비행태에 미치는 영향에 관한 연구" 한국광고학회 16 (16): 37-66, 2005

      8 Montepare, J. M., "You're Only as Old as You Feel : Self-Perceptions of Age, Fears of Aging, and the Life Satisfaction from Adolescence to Old Age" 4 : 73-78, 1989

      9 Koschate-Fischer, N., "Willing to Pay for Cause-Related Marketing : The Impact of Donation Amount and Moderating Effects" 49 (49): 910-927, 2012

      10 Mount, J., "Why Donors Give" 7 (7): 3-14, 1996

      11 Van Slyke, D. M., "Why Do People Give? New Evidence and Strategics for Nonprofit Managers" 35 (35): 199-222, 2005

      12 Micklewright, J., "Who Gives Charitable Donations for Overseas Development?" 38 (38): 317-341, 2009

      13 Simmon, H. A., "What is an Explanation of Behavior?" 3 : 150-161, 1992

      14 Tan, B., "Understanding Consumer Ethical Decision Making with Respect to Purchase of Pirated Software" 19 (19): 96-111, 2002

      15 Yi, Jonghan, "The psycho-social characteristics of Korean adults : Collectivist and moving toward individualist" 6 (6): 201-219, 2000

      16 Typper, K., "The Role of Labeling Process in Elderly Consumer's Response to Age Segmentation Cue" 20 : 503-518, 1994

      17 Strong, C., "The Problems of Translating Fair Trade Principles into Consumer Purchase Behaviour" 15 (15): 32-37, 1997

      18 Harbaugh, W. T., "The Prestige Motive for Making Charitable Transfers" 88 (88): 277-282, 1998

      19 Kim, J. E., "The Influence of Moral Emotions in Young Adults' Moral Decision Making: A Cross-Cultural Examination" The University of Minnesota 2009

      20 Ward, R. A., "The Impact of Subjective Age and Stigma in Older Persons" 1 : 18-27, 1977

      21 김광석, "The Effect of Fair Trade on Consumer Behavior: In Terms of Ethical Consumerism" 한국경영학회 38 (38): 295-315, 2009

      22 Chua, C., "The Antecedents of Cognitive Age" 17 : 880-885, 1990

      23 Kastenbaum, K. G., "The Age of Me : Toward Personal and Interpersonal Definitions of Functional Aging" 3 : 197-211, 1972

      24 Gwinner, K. P., "Testing the Implied Mediational Role of Cognitive Age" 18 (18): 1031-1048, 2001

      25 Barak, B., "Subjective Age Correlates : A research note" 26 : 571-578, 1986

      26 Goldsmith, R. E., "Subjective Age : A Test of Five Hypotheses" 32 : 312-317, 1992

      27 Rajan, S. S., "Socio-Democracy and Personality Characteristics of Canadian Donors Contribution to International Charity" 38 : 413-440, 2008

      28 Schervish, P. G., "Social Participation and Charitable Giving : A Multivarate Analysis" 8 (8): 235-260, 1997

      29 Skinner, B. F., "Skinner Beyond Freedom and Dignity" Knopf 1971

      30 Peter G. R., "Self-conceptions of Aged, Age-Identification and Aging" 11 : 69-73, 1971

      31 Monterpare, J. M., "Person Perception Comes of Age : The Salience and Significance of Age in Social Judgements" 30 : 93-161, 1998

      32 Sherman, E., "Marketing: A Return to the Broader Dimensions" American Marketing Association 319-320, 1988

      33 Walker, M. C., "Marketing to Seniors" First, Books Library 2004

      34 Winter, K., "Market Segmentation: A Tactical Approach" 57-59, 1984

      35 Andreoni, J., "Impure Altruism and Donations to Public Goods : A Theory of Warm-Glow Giving?" 100 : 464-477, 1990

      36 Dovidio, J. F., "Helping Behavior and Altruism, An Empirical and Conceptual Overview" 17 : 361-427, 1984

      37 Batson, D. C., "Four Motives for Community Involvement" 58 (58): 429-445, 2002

      38 Westerhof, G. J., "Forever Young? A Comparison of Age Identities in the United States and Germany" 25 (25): 366-383, 2003

      39 Wright, L. T., "Fair Trade Marketing: an Exploration Through Qualitative Research" 14 : 411-426, 2006

      40 Bendapudi, N., "Enhancing Helping Behavior : An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning" 60 (60): 33-49, 1996

      41 Winterich, K. P., "Donation Behavior Toward In-Groups and Out-Groups: The Role of Gender and Moral Identity" 36 : 2009

      42 Markus, H. R., "Culture and Self:Implication for Cognitions, Emotion, and Motivation" 98 (98): 224-253, 1981

      43 Ying, B., "Consumption Patterns of Chinese Elders : Evidence from a Survey in Wuhan, China" 27 (27): 702-714, 2006

      44 Johnson, E. B., "Cognitive Age: Understanding Consumer Alienation in the Mature Market" 17 (17): 35-40, 1996

      45 Barak, B., "Cognitive Age: A Nonchronological Age Variable" Association for Consumer Research 12 : 53-58, 1981

      46 Bargh, J. A., "Attractiveness and Its Consequences for Sexual Harassment and Aggression" 33 : 200-212, 1995

      47 Mael, F., "Alumni and Their Alma Mater : A Partial Test of the Reformulated Model of Organizational Identification" 13 (13): 103-123, 1992

      48 Haidt, J., "Affect, Culture, and Morality, or is It Wrong to Eat Your Dog?" 65 (65): 613-628, 1993

      49 Glazer, A., "A Signaling Explanation for Charity" 86 (86): 1019-1028, 1996

      50 Yoon, You-Kyung, "A Review of Subjective Age Perception" 19 (19): 61-78, 2000

      51 Han, Gyu seog, "A Cultural Profile of Korean Society : From Vertical Collectivism to Horizontal Individualism" 13 (13): 293-310, 1999

      52 이정기, "20대의 기부의도에 관한 탐색적 연구: 텔레비전 장르별 시청량, 가치성향, 계획행동이론 변인을 중심으로" 한국여성커뮤니케이션학회 20 (20): 173-205, 2011

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-24 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Academy Of Distribution Science -> Korea Distribution Science Association
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.72 0.72 0.69
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.7 0.72 0.762 0.31
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼