RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인지연산문법의 역동적 원시소: 반반상대성이론에 대한 비판적 숙고 = Dynamic Primitives and Anti-Anti-Relativism in the theory of Cognitive and Applicative Grammar

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100767243

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This paper presents a critical reflection on anti-anti-relativism proposed in the framework of the theory of Cognitive and Applicative Grammar(Descles 1997, 1998, etc.). The Cognitive and Applicative Grammar is a polystratal model, that extends the Shaumyan``s Universal Applicative Grammar. According to this theory, each natural language constructs specific cognitive representations across languages, but these cognitive representations are organized with the same elementary cognitive ingredients (invariants) : types (or different primitive categorizations); relations and operations (for instance topological operations). This paper seeks to offer a critical, reflective analysis of the basic elements of Descles’s approach to cognitive invariants.
      번역하기

      This paper presents a critical reflection on anti-anti-relativism proposed in the framework of the theory of Cognitive and Applicative Grammar(Descles 1997, 1998, etc.). The Cognitive and Applicative Grammar is a polystratal model, that extends the Sh...

      This paper presents a critical reflection on anti-anti-relativism proposed in the framework of the theory of Cognitive and Applicative Grammar(Descles 1997, 1998, etc.). The Cognitive and Applicative Grammar is a polystratal model, that extends the Shaumyan``s Universal Applicative Grammar. According to this theory, each natural language constructs specific cognitive representations across languages, but these cognitive representations are organized with the same elementary cognitive ingredients (invariants) : types (or different primitive categorizations); relations and operations (for instance topological operations). This paper seeks to offer a critical, reflective analysis of the basic elements of Descles’s approach to cognitive invariants.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 서종석, "역동적 원시소와 상식 행위론" 인문과학연구소 34 (34): 211-230, 2007

      2 Desclés,J.-P, "Transitivité sémantique, transitivitésyntaxique" La transitivité 161-180, 1998

      3 Talmy,L, "The windowing of attention in language, In Grammaticalconstructions" Their form and meaning 235-287, 1996

      4 Fodor, J, "The Language of Thought" Crowell Company 1975

      5 Croft, W, "Syntactic categories and grammatical relations:the cognitive organization of information" University of Chicago Press 1991

      6 Dijk, Teun, "Strategies of Discourse Comprension" Academia Press 1983

      7 Langacker,R.W, "Settings, participants, and grammatical relations, In Meanings and Prototypes" Studies in Linguistics Categorization 213-237, 1990

      8 Wierzbicka,A, "Semantics primes ans universals" Oxford University Press 2003

      9 Jackendoff, R, "Semantics and Cognition" MIT Press 1983

      10 Le Ny, J.-F, "Science cognitive et compréhension du langage" Presses Universitaires de France 1989

      1 서종석, "역동적 원시소와 상식 행위론" 인문과학연구소 34 (34): 211-230, 2007

      2 Desclés,J.-P, "Transitivité sémantique, transitivitésyntaxique" La transitivité 161-180, 1998

      3 Talmy,L, "The windowing of attention in language, In Grammaticalconstructions" Their form and meaning 235-287, 1996

      4 Fodor, J, "The Language of Thought" Crowell Company 1975

      5 Croft, W, "Syntactic categories and grammatical relations:the cognitive organization of information" University of Chicago Press 1991

      6 Dijk, Teun, "Strategies of Discourse Comprension" Academia Press 1983

      7 Langacker,R.W, "Settings, participants, and grammatical relations, In Meanings and Prototypes" Studies in Linguistics Categorization 213-237, 1990

      8 Wierzbicka,A, "Semantics primes ans universals" Oxford University Press 2003

      9 Jackendoff, R, "Semantics and Cognition" MIT Press 1983

      10 Le Ny, J.-F, "Science cognitive et compréhension du langage" Presses Universitaires de France 1989

      11 Desclés,J.-P, "Réflexions sur les grammaires cognitives" 1 : 69-98, 1994

      12 Benveniste,E, "Problèmes de la linguistique générale" Gallimard 1966

      13 Lemmens,M, "Lexical Perspectives on Transitivity and Ergativity. Causative Constructions in English" John Benjamins Publishing Company 1998

      14 Desclés,J.-P, "Les représentations cognitives du langagesont-elles universelles ?, In La réalité et lesigne : Essais sur le langage, logique et sens commun" Éditions Universit aires 53-81, 1998

      15 Wierzbicka,A, "La quête des primitifs sémantiques : 1965–1992" 99 : 9-22, 1993

      16 Langacker, R. W, "Foundations of Cognitive Grammar vol. 2,Descriptive Applications" Stanford University Press 1991

      17 Talmy,L, "Force dynamics in language and cognition" 12 : 49-100, 1988

      18 Quine,W.V.O, "Facts of the Matter, In Essays on the Philosophy of W. V. O. Quine" Harvester 1979

      19 DeLancey, S, "Event construal and case role assignment" 17 : 338-353, 1991

      20 Thomsen,O.N, "Dyirbal ergativity and embedding: Afunctional-pragmatic approach" 18 (18): 411-488, 1994

      21 Langacker,R.W, "Concept, Image, and Symbol : The Cognitive Basisof Grammar" de Gruyter 1991

      22 Desclés, J.-P, "Causalité, causativité,transitivité" Typology ofverbal categories 7-27, 1998

      23 Chomsky,N, "Aspects of the theory of syntax" MIT Press 1965

      24 Cienki, A, "9th and 20th century theories of case, Acomparison of localist and cognitive approaches" 1 : 23-162, 1995

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-06-09 학회명변경 영문명 : Language Rearch Institute(LRI) -> Language Research Institute(LRI) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.37 0.37 0.37
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.39 0.4 0.704 0.16
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼