Stress distribution of molars restored with minimal invasive and conventional technique: a 3-D finite element analysis

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Purpose: This study aimed to analyze stress distribution and maximum von Mises stress generated in intracoronal restorations and in tooth structures of mandibular molars with various types of cavity designs and materials. Materials and Methods: Threedimensional solid models of mandible molar such as O inlay cavity with composite and gold (OR-C, OG-C), MO inlay cavity with composite and gold (MR-C, MG-C), and minimal invasive cavity on occlusal and proximal surfaces (OR-M, MR-M) were designed. To simulate masticatory force, static axial load with total force of 200 N was applied on the tooth at 10 occlusal contact points. A finite element analysis was performed to predict stress distribution generated by occlusal loading. Results: Restorations with minimal cavity design generated significantly lower values of von Mises stress (OR-M model: 26.8 MPa; MR-M model: 72.7 MPa) compared to those with conventional cavity design (341.9 MPa to 397.2 MPa). In tooth structure, magnitudes of maximum von Mises stresses were similar among models with conventional design (372.8 - 412.9 MPa) and models with minimal cavity design (361.1 - 384.4 MPa). Conclusion: Minimal invasive models generated smaller maximum von Mises stresses within restorations. Within the enamel, similar maximum von Mises stresses were observed for models with minimal cavity design and those with conventional design.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Tassery H, "Use of new minimum intervention dentistry technologies in caries management" 58 (58): 40-59, 2013

2 Guven S, "Three-dimensional finite-element analysis of two ceramic inlay restorations with different cavity designs" 29 : 579-585, 2015

3 허경회, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the splinted implant prosthesis in a reconstructed mandible" 대한치과보철학회 10 (10): 138-146, 2018

4 Dejak B, "Three-dimensional finite element analysis of strength and adhesion of composite resin versus ceramic inlays in molars" 99 : 131-140, 2008

5 Costa A, "The influence of elastic modulus of inlay materials on stress distribution and fracture of premolars" 39 : E160-E170, 2014

6 Fonseca RB, "The influence of cavity preparation design on fracture strength and mode of fracture of laboratory processed composite resin restorations" 98 : 277-284, 2007

7 Thompson MC, "The allceramic, inlay supported fixed partial denture. Part 1. Ceramic inlay preparation design: a literature review" 55 : 120-127, 2010

8 Latino C, "Support of undermined occlusal enamel provided by restorative materials" 32 : 287-291, 2001

9 양홍서, "Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis" 대한치과보철학회 10 (10): 184-190, 2018

10 Jiang W, "Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: a threedimensional finite element analysis" 103 : 6-12, 2010

11 Abu-Hanna AA, "Resin composite reinforcement of undermined enamel" 29 : 234-237, 2004

12 Casagrande L, "Repair may increase survival of direct posterior restorations - A practice based study" 64 : 30-36, 2017

13 White JM, "Rationale and treatment approach in minimally invasive dentistry" 131 : 13S-19S, 2000

14 Sabbagh J, "Posterior composites: Update on cavities and filling techniques" 57 : 86-90, 2017

15 Ausiello P, "Numerical fatigue 3D-FE modeling of indirect composite-restored posterior teeth" 27 : 423-430, 2011

16 Ericson D, "Minimally Invasive Dentistry - concepts and techniques in cariology" 1 : 59-72, 2003

17 Banerjee A, "Minimal intervention dentistry: part 7. Minimally invasive operative caries management:rationale and techniques" 214 : 107-111, 2013

18 Tyas MJ, "Minimal intervention dentistry - a review. FDI Commission Project 1-97" 50 : 1-12, 2000

19 Zelic K, "Mechanical weakening of devitalized teeth: three-dimensional Finite Element Analysis and prediction of tooth fracture" 48 : 850-863, 2015

20 Lynch CD, "Guidance on posterior resin composites:Academy of Operative Dentistry - European Section" 42 : 377-383, 2014

21 Soares CJ, "Fracture resistance of teeth restored with indirectcomposite and ceramic inlay systems" 35 : 281-286, 2004

22 St-Georges AJ, "Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations" 89 : 551-557, 2003

23 Zarone F, "Evaluation of the biomechanical behavior of maxillary central incisors restored by means of endocrowns compared to a natural tooth: a 3D static linear finite elements analysis" 22 : 1035-1044, 2006

24 Magne P, "Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data" 23 : 539-548, 2007

25 Yamanel K, "Effects of different ceramic and composite materials on stress distribution in inlay and onlay cavities: 3-D finite element analysis" 28 : 661-670, 2009

26 Wayne JS, "Effect of restoration volume on stresses in a mandibular molar: a finite element study" 112 : 925-931, 2014

27 Eidelman E, "Composite resin support of undermined enamel in amalgam restorations" 21 : 118-120, 1999

28 Staehle HJ, "A 6.5-year clinical follow-up of direct resin composite buildups in the posterior dentition: Introduction of a new minimally invasive restorative method" 43 : 1211-1217, 2015