RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      다양한 턴 수를 갖는 폐루프형 진동형 히트 파이프와 폐쇄형 진동형 히트 파이프에 관한 연구

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101716363

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Closed-loop micro pulsating heat pipes (CLMPHPs) and closed-end micro pulsating heat pipes (CEMPHPs) were compared experimentally to determine which type of a MPHP performs better. The MPHPs have a meandering rectangular channel, and the width and height of the channel are 1mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. For flow visualization in MPHPs, the Pyrex glass was used as a cover. Ethanol was used as a working fluid, and filling ratio of the working fluid was fixed at 50%. A series of experiments were performed at various input powers and inclination angles for the MPHPs with 5, 10, 15, and 20 turns. Experimental results show that the CLMPHP requires as many as 20 turns for an orientation-independent performance while only 10 turns is enough for the CEMPHP to have orientation-independent performance. The CEMPHP has higher effective thermal conductivity up to 1.3 times in a vertical mode and 2.5 times in a horizontal mode than the CLMPHP. Finally, it is recommended to use the CEMPHP which has more than 10 turns for an orientation-independent performance.
      번역하기

      Closed-loop micro pulsating heat pipes (CLMPHPs) and closed-end micro pulsating heat pipes (CEMPHPs) were compared experimentally to determine which type of a MPHP performs better. The MPHPs have a meandering rectangular channel, and the width and hei...

      Closed-loop micro pulsating heat pipes (CLMPHPs) and closed-end micro pulsating heat pipes (CEMPHPs) were compared experimentally to determine which type of a MPHP performs better. The MPHPs have a meandering rectangular channel, and the width and height of the channel are 1mm and 0.5 mm, respectively. For flow visualization in MPHPs, the Pyrex glass was used as a cover. Ethanol was used as a working fluid, and filling ratio of the working fluid was fixed at 50%. A series of experiments were performed at various input powers and inclination angles for the MPHPs with 5, 10, 15, and 20 turns. Experimental results show that the CLMPHP requires as many as 20 turns for an orientation-independent performance while only 10 turns is enough for the CEMPHP to have orientation-independent performance. The CEMPHP has higher effective thermal conductivity up to 1.3 times in a vertical mode and 2.5 times in a horizontal mode than the CLMPHP. Finally, it is recommended to use the CEMPHP which has more than 10 turns for an orientation-independent performance.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 실험 장치 및 방법
      • 3. 결과 및 고찰
      • 4. 결론
      • Abstract
      • 1. 서론
      • 2. 실험 장치 및 방법
      • 3. 결과 및 고찰
      • 4. 결론
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼