RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Effective Sample Sizes for the Test of Mean Differences Based on Homogeneity Test

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A106371143

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Many researchers in various study fields use the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test to confirm their treatment effects. The two sample 􀆒 􀃠 test is generally used for small samples, and assumes that two independent random samples are selected from normal populations, and the population variances are unknown. Researchers often conduct 􀂟 􀃠test, the test of equality of variances, before testing the treatment effects, and the test statistic or confidence interval for the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test has two formats according to whether the variances are equal or not. Researchers using the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test often want to know how large sample sizes they need to get reliable test results. This research gives some guidelines for sample sizes to them through simulation works. The simulation had run for normal populations with the different ratios of two variances for different sample sizes (􀀽 􀃐􀃗 ). The simulation results are as follows. First, if one has no idea equality of variances but he/she can assume the difference is moderate, it is safe to use sample size at least 20 in terms of the nominal level of significance. Second, the power of 􀂟 􀃠test for the equality of variances is very low when the sample sizes are small (􀃯 􀃐􀃗) even though the ratio of two variances is equal to 􀃏. Third, the sample sizes at least 􀃎􀃗 for the two sample 􀆒 􀃠 test are recommendable in terms of the nominal level of significance and the error limit.
      번역하기

      Many researchers in various study fields use the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test to confirm their treatment effects. The two sample 􀆒 􀃠 test is generally used for small samples, and assumes that two independent random samples are selected from normal p...

      Many researchers in various study fields use the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test to confirm their treatment effects. The two sample 􀆒 􀃠 test is generally used for small samples, and assumes that two independent random samples are selected from normal populations, and the population variances are unknown. Researchers often conduct 􀂟 􀃠test, the test of equality of variances, before testing the treatment effects, and the test statistic or confidence interval for the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test has two formats according to whether the variances are equal or not. Researchers using the two sample 􀆒 􀃠test often want to know how large sample sizes they need to get reliable test results. This research gives some guidelines for sample sizes to them through simulation works. The simulation had run for normal populations with the different ratios of two variances for different sample sizes (􀀽 􀃐􀃗 ). The simulation results are as follows. First, if one has no idea equality of variances but he/she can assume the difference is moderate, it is safe to use sample size at least 20 in terms of the nominal level of significance. Second, the power of 􀂟 􀃠test for the equality of variances is very low when the sample sizes are small (􀃯 􀃐􀃗) even though the ratio of two variances is equal to 􀃏. Third, the sample sizes at least 􀃎􀃗 for the two sample 􀆒 􀃠 test are recommendable in terms of the nominal level of significance and the error limit.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Student, "The probable error of mean" 6 : 1-25, 1908

      2 J. Pfanzagl, "Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIV, A forerunner of the t-distribution" 83 : 891-898, 1996

      3 G. Casella, "Statistical Inference" Brooks/Cole Publishing Company 1990

      4 The Korean Statistical Society, "Statistical Glossary" Freeacademy Inc 1987

      5 J. E. Freund, "Mathematical Statistics" Prentice-Hall International, Inc. 1992

      6 S. H. Park, "Design of Experiments" Minyeongsa 2003

      7 F. E. Satterthwaite, "An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components" 2 : 110-114, 1946

      1 Student, "The probable error of mean" 6 : 1-25, 1908

      2 J. Pfanzagl, "Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIV, A forerunner of the t-distribution" 83 : 891-898, 1996

      3 G. Casella, "Statistical Inference" Brooks/Cole Publishing Company 1990

      4 The Korean Statistical Society, "Statistical Glossary" Freeacademy Inc 1987

      5 J. E. Freund, "Mathematical Statistics" Prentice-Hall International, Inc. 1992

      6 S. H. Park, "Design of Experiments" Minyeongsa 2003

      7 F. E. Satterthwaite, "An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components" 2 : 110-114, 1946

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가)
      2021-12-01 평가 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가)
      2020-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) KCI등재후보
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2010-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.45 0.45 0.35
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.25 0.24 0.05
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼