Many researchers in various study fields use the two sample test to confirm their treatment effects. The two sample test is generally used for small samples, and assumes that two independent random samples are selected from normal p...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Many researchers in various study fields use the two sample test to confirm their treatment effects. The two sample test is generally used for small samples, and assumes that two independent random samples are selected from normal p...
Many researchers in various study fields use the two sample test to confirm their treatment effects. The two sample test is generally used for small samples, and assumes that two independent random samples are selected from normal populations, and the population variances are unknown. Researchers often conduct test, the test of equality of variances, before testing the treatment effects, and the test statistic or confidence interval for the two sample test has two formats according to whether the variances are equal or not. Researchers using the two sample test often want to know how large sample sizes they need to get reliable test results. This research gives some guidelines for sample sizes to them through simulation works. The simulation had run for normal populations with the different ratios of two variances for different sample sizes ( ). The simulation results are as follows. First, if one has no idea equality of variances but he/she can assume the difference is moderate, it is safe to use sample size at least 20 in terms of the nominal level of significance. Second, the power of test for the equality of variances is very low when the sample sizes are small ( ) even though the ratio of two variances is equal to . Third, the sample sizes at least for the two sample test are recommendable in terms of the nominal level of significance and the error limit.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Student, "The probable error of mean" 6 : 1-25, 1908
2 J. Pfanzagl, "Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIV, A forerunner of the t-distribution" 83 : 891-898, 1996
3 G. Casella, "Statistical Inference" Brooks/Cole Publishing Company 1990
4 The Korean Statistical Society, "Statistical Glossary" Freeacademy Inc 1987
5 J. E. Freund, "Mathematical Statistics" Prentice-Hall International, Inc. 1992
6 S. H. Park, "Design of Experiments" Minyeongsa 2003
7 F. E. Satterthwaite, "An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components" 2 : 110-114, 1946
1 Student, "The probable error of mean" 6 : 1-25, 1908
2 J. Pfanzagl, "Studies in the history of probability and statistics XLIV, A forerunner of the t-distribution" 83 : 891-898, 1996
3 G. Casella, "Statistical Inference" Brooks/Cole Publishing Company 1990
4 The Korean Statistical Society, "Statistical Glossary" Freeacademy Inc 1987
5 J. E. Freund, "Mathematical Statistics" Prentice-Hall International, Inc. 1992
6 S. H. Park, "Design of Experiments" Minyeongsa 2003
7 F. E. Satterthwaite, "An approximate distribution of estimates of variance components" 2 : 110-114, 1946
Numerical Switching Performances of Cumulative Sum Chart for Dispersion Matrix
Effects of Chamaecyparis Obtusa Essential Oil on the Autonomic Nervous System
Reactions of 1,1-Dichloro-2,3,4,5-Tetraphenyl-1-Silacyclopentadiene with Magnesium and Lithium
An Alternative Optimization Procedure for Parameter Design
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | 평가예정 | 신규평가 신청대상 (신규평가) | |
2021-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 탈락 (계속평가) | |
2020-12-01 | 평가 | 등재후보로 하락 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2012-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.45 | 0.45 | 0.35 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.28 | 0.25 | 0.24 | 0.05 |