RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      간호사의 직무소진 및 직무열의 영향요인 = The factors that affect work engagement and work burnout for nurses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T12154341

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Work engagement has become a hot issue in recent years among human services. However, unlike the concept of work burnout, work engagement has rarely been studied in the academic literature and relatively little is known about its antecedents and consequences in nursing. The purpose of this study is to understand about not only work engagement but also work burnout and research about the factors that affect on both concepts, when nurses work in a hospital. What's more this study examines the relationship between work engagement and work burnout.
      For this purpose, the researcher sampled 400 nurses working for eight general hospitals in Seoul and Gyeong-gi do for a questionnaire survey, and 342nurses responded to the survey. The data were collected through the questionnaire survey from January 22 through March 3, 2010.
      The tools used for this study were the scales about Work Engagement, Work Burnout, Job Characteristics, Customer-related Social Stressor, Surface Acting & Deep Acting of Emotional labor. The data collected were processed using SPSS Window 16.0 Program for actual number and percentage, different to a dependent variable of general characteristics, means, standard deviation, correlation coefficients and stepwise multiple regression analysis.

      The results of this study can be summarized as follows;

      1) Work Engagement for nurses scored 4.37 on average, and its factor affecting Work Engagement most was Job Characteristics (4.83), Deep Acting of Emotional Labor (4.70), Customer-related Social Stressor (4.99). Also, Work Burnout scored 4.41 on average, and its factor affecting Work Engagement most was Customer-related Social Stressor (4.99), Job Characteristics (4.83), Surface Acting of Emotional Labor (4.70).

      2) Estimated regression model of Work Engagement of nurses showed significant value (F=87.660, p<.001). Major factors which affect Work Engagement of nurses were observed as Job Characteristics(β=.46), Deep Acting of Emotional Labor(β=.33), turnover intention(β=-.16), job experiences(β=.11), Customer-related Social Stressor(β=-.09), which explained 56.0% of Work Engagement of nurse.

      3) Estimated regression model of Burnout of nurses showed significant value (F=48.669, p<.001). Major factors which affect burnout of nurses were observed as Customer-related Social Stressor(β=.39), turnover intention(β=.26), job experiences(β=-.20), Job Characteristics(β=-.16), Surface Acting of Emotional Labor(β=.11), which explained 41.1% of Burnout of nurse.

      These results demonstrate convincingly that factors which effect of Work Engagement and Work Burnout work in the opposite direction each other. To be specific, factors of Job Characteristics and job experiences influence on Work Engagement positively but Work Burnout negatively. On the other hand, factors of Customer-related Social Stressor and turnover intention effect on Work Engagement negatively but Work Burnout positively.
      In addition, it was confirmed that the consequences of emotional labor depends on employees’ strategic action on emotional labor. In detail, the deep acting which is engaged in active emotional regulation is related to Work Engagement, whereas the surface acting which is engaged in passive emotional regulation is connected with Work Burnout. Emotional labor strategy had a significant role in attitude such as Work Engagement and Work Burnout in work. Finally, the implications and limitations were discussed.
      번역하기

      Work engagement has become a hot issue in recent years among human services. However, unlike the concept of work burnout, work engagement has rarely been studied in the academic literature and relatively little is known about its antecedents and conse...

      Work engagement has become a hot issue in recent years among human services. However, unlike the concept of work burnout, work engagement has rarely been studied in the academic literature and relatively little is known about its antecedents and consequences in nursing. The purpose of this study is to understand about not only work engagement but also work burnout and research about the factors that affect on both concepts, when nurses work in a hospital. What's more this study examines the relationship between work engagement and work burnout.
      For this purpose, the researcher sampled 400 nurses working for eight general hospitals in Seoul and Gyeong-gi do for a questionnaire survey, and 342nurses responded to the survey. The data were collected through the questionnaire survey from January 22 through March 3, 2010.
      The tools used for this study were the scales about Work Engagement, Work Burnout, Job Characteristics, Customer-related Social Stressor, Surface Acting & Deep Acting of Emotional labor. The data collected were processed using SPSS Window 16.0 Program for actual number and percentage, different to a dependent variable of general characteristics, means, standard deviation, correlation coefficients and stepwise multiple regression analysis.

      The results of this study can be summarized as follows;

      1) Work Engagement for nurses scored 4.37 on average, and its factor affecting Work Engagement most was Job Characteristics (4.83), Deep Acting of Emotional Labor (4.70), Customer-related Social Stressor (4.99). Also, Work Burnout scored 4.41 on average, and its factor affecting Work Engagement most was Customer-related Social Stressor (4.99), Job Characteristics (4.83), Surface Acting of Emotional Labor (4.70).

      2) Estimated regression model of Work Engagement of nurses showed significant value (F=87.660, p<.001). Major factors which affect Work Engagement of nurses were observed as Job Characteristics(β=.46), Deep Acting of Emotional Labor(β=.33), turnover intention(β=-.16), job experiences(β=.11), Customer-related Social Stressor(β=-.09), which explained 56.0% of Work Engagement of nurse.

      3) Estimated regression model of Burnout of nurses showed significant value (F=48.669, p<.001). Major factors which affect burnout of nurses were observed as Customer-related Social Stressor(β=.39), turnover intention(β=.26), job experiences(β=-.20), Job Characteristics(β=-.16), Surface Acting of Emotional Labor(β=.11), which explained 41.1% of Burnout of nurse.

      These results demonstrate convincingly that factors which effect of Work Engagement and Work Burnout work in the opposite direction each other. To be specific, factors of Job Characteristics and job experiences influence on Work Engagement positively but Work Burnout negatively. On the other hand, factors of Customer-related Social Stressor and turnover intention effect on Work Engagement negatively but Work Burnout positively.
      In addition, it was confirmed that the consequences of emotional labor depends on employees’ strategic action on emotional labor. In detail, the deep acting which is engaged in active emotional regulation is related to Work Engagement, whereas the surface acting which is engaged in passive emotional regulation is connected with Work Burnout. Emotional labor strategy had a significant role in attitude such as Work Engagement and Work Burnout in work. Finally, the implications and limitations were discussed.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • I. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 3
      • 3. 용어의 정 3
      • I. 서론
      • 1. 연구의 필요성 1
      • 2. 연구의 목적 3
      • 3. 용어의 정 3
      • II. 이론적 배경
      • 1. 직무소진 및 직무열의 6
      • 2. 직무소진 및 직무열의 관련 영향요인 11
      • III. 연구방법
      • 1. 연구설계 17
      • 2. 연구대상 17
      • 3. 연구도구 17
      • 4. 자료수집 기간 및 방법 19
      • 5. 자료분석 20
      • IV. 연구결과
      • 1. 대상자의 인구사회학적 특성 22
      • 2. 간호사의 직무소진 및 직무열의와 관련요인의 평균 26
      • 3. 간호사의 직무소진 및 직무열의와 관련요인 간의 상관관계 27
      • 4. 간호사의 직무소진 및 직무열의 영향요인 29
      • V. 논의 32
      • VI. 결론 및 제언 37
      • 참고문헌 39
      • 부록 50
      • 초록 56
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼