통합국정평가제도의 필요성과 구축방안

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In Korean government. various evaluation systems are being managed by many departments and agencies causing a lot of problems. Therefore. it is demanded to establish the Integrated Public Service Evaluation System(IPSES) that organically connects and integrates many evaluation systems operated disjointedly and increases synergy effects by linking to the other government management innovations. The basic directions for establishing IPSES include the guarantee of autonomy, the assurance of accountability, the enhancement of transparency. and the maximization of performance and strengthening of competitiveness. The basic principles of IPSES are the decentralization of control by the central government. the strengthening of evaluation capacity. the disclosure of the results of self evaluation, and the principle of rewards on performance. In order to realize the IPSES in practice, "The Basic Government Evaluation Act" needs to be enacted that integrates and coordinates many government evaluation systems that are disjointed. the existing control-oriented evaluation methods should be changed to self-evaluation method. and the integrated performance management system based on performance management plan and review mechanism needs to be established. In addition. it is necessary to reinvent the overall government evaluation infrastructure including the government evaluation committee that is mandated to plan and coordinate government-wide evaluation. the general evaluation council that confirms and reviews the results of self-evaluation. and the self-evaluation committees that directly evaluate policies and programs in each department.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 머리말
• Ⅱ. 통합국정평가제도의 필요성
• Ⅲ. 통합국정평가제도의 구축방안
• Ⅳ. 맺음말
• 〈참고문헌〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 박희정, "지방자치단체를 위한 적정 자체평가모형에 관한 연구" 15 (15): 113-144,

2 김현구, "중앙행정기관 주요정책과제 평가의 분석적 논고" 12 (12): 291-326, 2003

3 김명수, "중앙행정기과 평가제도의 운영에 대한 비판적 검토" 13 (13): 1-21, 2003

4 라휘문, "정부업무평가제도의 현황과 과제 통합운영모형 구축을 위한 시론적 연구 정부업무 평가의 주요 쟁점" 30-53, 2005

5 이창기, "정부업무평가를 위한 성과지표개발방안 정부업무 평가의 주요 쟁점" 5-29, 2005

6 하미승, "정부 성과관리시스템의 문제점 진단과 개선방향:통합화 시각" 13 (13): 235-273, 2004

7 김성종, "자체평가시스템 구축방안 연구 국정운영의 효율화를 위한 국가평가인프라 구축방안" 147-169, 2004

8 이윤식 외 5인, "외국 평가 실태조사보고서" 감사원 2004a

9 이세구, "성과주의 예산제도 도입에 따른 지방자치단체의 통합성과관리방안 - 서울시 사례를 중심으로" 8 (8): 135-162, 2003

10 국가평가인프라구축추진단, "국가평가인프라구축의 기본원칙과 방향" 1-22, 2004

11 이윤식 외 5인, "국가평가인프라구축을 위한 통합적 성과관리체계에 관한 연구" 대통령자문 정책기획위원회 2004b

12 국가평가인프라구축추진단, "국가평가인프라구축방향" 1-8, 2005

13 노화준, "결과지향적 관리의 효율화를 위한 정책평가제도의 개혁" 14 (14): 1-28,

14 박중훈, "결과중심의 성과측정 및 성과관리체제에 관한 연구" 한국행정연구원 1998

15 Wholey, "Responding to the Challenges" 288-307, 1999

16 null, "Policy Evaluation System for the Government of Canada" 2004

17 Washington, "Performance Measurement: Challenges and Strategies" 2003

18 Public Management Occasional Papers, "Performance Management in Government" OECD 1994

19 Ammons, "Overcoming the Inadequacies of Performance Measurement in Local Government The Case of Libraries and Leisure Services" 37-47, 1995

20 "Note pour les inspecteurs gnraux membres du comit des inspecteurs gnraux des finances" 2003

21 National Audit Office, "Helping the Nation Spend Wisely" 2004

22 "Audit and Inspection - The Work of the Audit Commission" 2003

23 Hood, "A Public Management for All Seasons" 112-129, 1991

24 "A Modern Approach to Inspecting Services" 2004