RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      日本語の形容詞の連体形と終止形アクセントの実態調査 = Attributive form of a Japanese adjective and actual condition survey of the end-form accent - For Japanese adjective accent education -

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      An actual condition survey of the accent of "fundamental form (the independent shape)" "attributive form" "end-form" was performed respectively, and 30 Japanese adjectives (12 nakadaka-types, 18 heiban-types) were analyzed and considered targeted for 13 Japanese staying in Korea at present for education of the adjective accent of the Korean Japanese learner. When this result is gathered, it seems to be the next. 1st, for, the difference between Tokyo and from the area wasn"t seen so much, and the person who just has the individual differences and is teaching Japanese could see the tendency which maintains the accent of the standard language. The similar result was in in a face of the flow of a partial but big change which is slightly by pronunciation of the Japanese who is in Japan and the Japanese staying in Korea lengthily. 2nd, for, the heiban-type and the nakadaka- type had a percentage higher than 3 hakugo of the change in 4 and 5 hakugo and were investigated. In other words, it can be said that there are a lot of changes to-2 like a long word of hakusuu. 3rd, for, since putting it in the fundamental form and the end-form of the heibann-type, the nakadaka-type exceeds the heiban-type big. The heibantype exceeds the nakadaka-type big for an attributive form contrastively with this. 4th, for, almost no-2 adjective changed with inflection, and a change in the accent wasn"t seen.
      번역하기

      An actual condition survey of the accent of "fundamental form (the independent shape)" "attributive form" "end-form" was performed respectively, and 30 Japanese adjectives (12 nakadaka-types, 18 heiban-types) were analyzed and considered targeted for ...

      An actual condition survey of the accent of "fundamental form (the independent shape)" "attributive form" "end-form" was performed respectively, and 30 Japanese adjectives (12 nakadaka-types, 18 heiban-types) were analyzed and considered targeted for 13 Japanese staying in Korea at present for education of the adjective accent of the Korean Japanese learner. When this result is gathered, it seems to be the next. 1st, for, the difference between Tokyo and from the area wasn"t seen so much, and the person who just has the individual differences and is teaching Japanese could see the tendency which maintains the accent of the standard language. The similar result was in in a face of the flow of a partial but big change which is slightly by pronunciation of the Japanese who is in Japan and the Japanese staying in Korea lengthily. 2nd, for, the heiban-type and the nakadaka- type had a percentage higher than 3 hakugo of the change in 4 and 5 hakugo and were investigated. In other words, it can be said that there are a lot of changes to-2 like a long word of hakusuu. 3rd, for, since putting it in the fundamental form and the end-form of the heibann-type, the nakadaka-type exceeds the heiban-type big. The heibantype exceeds the nakadaka-type big for an attributive form contrastively with this. 4th, for, almost no-2 adjective changed with inflection, and a change in the accent wasn"t seen.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. はじめに
      • 2. 研究方法と調査対象
      • 3. 形容詞アクセントの教育の必要性
      • 4. 調査結果
      • 5. おわりに
      • 1. はじめに
      • 2. 研究方法と調査対象
      • 3. 形容詞アクセントの教育の必要性
      • 4. 調査結果
      • 5. おわりに
      • [参考文献]
      • 〈参考辞書〉
      • 〈要旨〉
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 李 香 蘭, "韓國人の日本語學習者における形容詞アクセントの實態調査" 한국일본문화학회 (28) : 63-75, 2006

      2 馬瀬良雄, "講座日本語と日本語教育(日本語の音声と音韻(上)" 明治書院 206-232, 1989

      3 佐藤亮一, "現代東京語のアクセント -年齢差および辞典との差を中心にして" 明治書院 204-239, 1990

      4 井上史雄, "業界用語のアクセント" 21 (21): 34-39, 1992

      5 이향란, "東京語における形容詞アクセントの?化" 한국일본어문학회 (23) : 109-126, 2004

      6 小林めぐみ, "東京語における形容詞アクセントの変化とその要因" 7 (7): 101-113, 2003

      7 日本放送協会, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 本放送出版協会 1-1096, 1966

      8 秋永一枝, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 70-116, 1998

      9 NHK, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 1-231, 1998

      10 NHK, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 1-990, 1985

      1 李 香 蘭, "韓國人の日本語學習者における形容詞アクセントの實態調査" 한국일본문화학회 (28) : 63-75, 2006

      2 馬瀬良雄, "講座日本語と日本語教育(日本語の音声と音韻(上)" 明治書院 206-232, 1989

      3 佐藤亮一, "現代東京語のアクセント -年齢差および辞典との差を中心にして" 明治書院 204-239, 1990

      4 井上史雄, "業界用語のアクセント" 21 (21): 34-39, 1992

      5 이향란, "東京語における形容詞アクセントの?化" 한국일본어문학회 (23) : 109-126, 2004

      6 小林めぐみ, "東京語における形容詞アクセントの変化とその要因" 7 (7): 101-113, 2003

      7 日本放送協会, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 本放送出版協会 1-1096, 1966

      8 秋永一枝, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 70-116, 1998

      9 NHK, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 1-231, 1998

      10 NHK, "日本語発音アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 1-990, 1985

      11 NHK, "日本語発音アクセント新辞典" 日本放送出版協会 1-1764, 2016

      12 日本放送協会, "日本語アクセント辞典" 日本放送出版協会 1-803, 1951

      13 이향란, "日本語の形容詞アクセント変化の実態調査-韓国人の日本語学習者のアクセント教育のため-" 한국일어교육학회 (28) : 115-127, 2014

      14 李 香 蘭, "日本語における形容詞アクセントの實態調査-地方出身者の發音を中心に-" 한국일본문화학회 (24) : 75-90, 2005

      15 金田一京助他, "新選国語辞典" 小学館 1-1037, 2011

      16 秋永一枝, "新明解日本語アクセント辞典" 三省堂 1-1764, 2001

      17 山田 忠雄他, "新明解国語辞典" 三省堂 1-1728, 2012

      18 放送研究部, "放送のことば-平らになる外来語のアクセント" (37) : 36-41, 1987

      19 李香蘭, "平板化する日本語のアクセント-外来語を中心に" 韓国日本 文化学会 2 : 51-69, 1996

      20 相沢正夫, "アクセントの変化の要因" 明治書院 1984

      21 杉藤美代子, "アクセントの「ゆれ" 8 (8): 15-26, 1983

      22 相沢正夫, "アクセントと日本語教育-機能アクセント論の試み-" 明治書院 (2) : 124-131, 1991

      23 最上勝也, "NHK放送研究と調査" 72-77, 1984

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.19 0.2 0.421 0.14
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼