Marxan with Zones 적용을 통한 북한산국립공원 공원자연보존지구 재설정 방안 연구 = Re-establishment of Park Nature Conservation Area in Bukhansan (Mt.) National Park Using Marxan with Zones

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study aimed to develop strategies to re-establish the Park Nature Conservation Area in Bukhansan National Park, reflecting landscape ecological value by using the zonation program Marxan with Zones. Planning unit was set by watershed, and the basic data were mapped, considering topographical and ecological values. Mapped indicators were analyzed with the application framework of Marxan with Zones by indexing some indicators. The zones divided into Park Nature Conservation Area (Zone A), Park Nature Environment Area (Zone B) which is reflected on the concept of Potential Park Nature Conservation Area and Park Nature Environment Area (Zone C). The best solution for each of the scenarios was fixed through the sensitiveness analysis. From these, the final solution was selected considering five criteria including area ratio of conservation area and grouping. Lastly, the final solution was verified in the overlapped analysis with recent zonation. According to the results, the number of watersheds was 77, with an average area of 1,007,481 m². In terms of basic mapping and indexation, the slope index and number of landscape resources for topographical property were average 0.22 and 38 places, respectively. Biotope index was average 0.69 and legally protected species was 14 species, reflecting ecological values. As the social and economic indicators, trail index was average 0.04, and the number of tour and management facilities was 43 places. Through the framework of Marxan with Zones, the best solution for scenario 1 which was set by the highest conservation criteria was selected as the final solution, and the area ratio of Park Nature Conservation Area and grouping was excellent. As the result of overlapped analysis, suggested zonation of the Park Nature Conservation was better than the recent zonation in the area raito (28.3%), biotope grade (15.4%) and the distribution points (10 places) of legally protected species with verification of proper distribution of conservation features according to the zone.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 유주한, "환경친화적 국토보전을 위한 자연생태계 평가요인 및 평가지표의 중요도에 관한 연구" 한국환경영향평가학회 14 (14): 165-177, 2005

2 최태영, "지리산의 멧돼지 Sus scrofa 행동권" 한국생태학회 29 (29): 253-257, 2006

3 이화진, "소백산국립공원내 서식하는 중형포유류 3종의 행동권 분석" 한국환경복원기술학회 17 (17): 51-60, 2014

4 Day, J. C., "Zoning-lessons from the Great Barrier Reef Marine Park" 45 : 139-156, 2002

5 Jefferson, R. G., "Wildlife conservation evaluation" Chapman and Hall Ltd 69-91, 1986

6 Seo, C. W., "Wild boar (Sus scrofa coreanus Heude) habitat modeling using GIS and logistic regression" 8 : 85-99, 2000

7 Helliwell, D. R., "Valuation of wildlife resources" 3 : 41-47, 1969

8 Ministry of Environment, "Study on strategy establishment of national level of biodiversity" 2014

9 Klein, C. J., "Striking a balance between biodiversity conservation and socioeconomic viability in the design of marine protected areas" 22 : 691-700, 2008

10 Farina, A., "Soundscape Ecology" Springer 1-28, 2014

11 Ban, N. C., "Setting the stage for marine spatial planning: Ecological and social data collation and analyses in Canada's Pacific waters" 39 : 11-20, 2009

12 Joseph, L. N., "Securing nonflagship species from extinction" 4 : 324-325, 2011

13 Ministry of Environment, "Regulation about method of natural environment and categorizing criteria of grade"

14 Airame, S., "Place matters: Geospatial tools for marine science, conservation, and management in the pacific northwest" Oregon State University Press 91-124, 2005

15 Scholz, A., "Participatory socioeconomic analysis : Drawing on fishermen’s knowledge for marine protected area planning in California" 28 : 335-349, 2004

16 Joseph, L. N., "Optimal allocation of resources among threatened species, a project prioritization protocal" 23 : 328-338, 2009

17 Jo, G. H., "On the amendments of the nature park law to conserve the national parks in Korea" 29 : 383-408, 1994

18 Marks, R., "Meohoden ökologischer planung im kommunalen umweltschutz am beispiel der stadt dortmund, VGFO Band 18" Goettingen 589-592, 1989

19 Watts, M., "Marxan with zones: Software for optimal conservation based land-and sea-use zoning" 24 : 1513-1521, 2009

20 Watts, M., "Marxan with zones"

21 Ardron, J. A., "Marxan good practices handbook" Pachific Marine Analysis and Research Association 2010

22 Halpern, B. S., "Managing for cumulative impacts in ecosystem-based management through ocean zoning" 51 : 203-211, 2008

23 Lee, K. J., "Management proposal of Sobaeksan National Park" 7 : 58-71, 1994

24 Yim, K. B., "Management proposal of Bukhan Mountain National Park" 1 : 83-97, 1987

25 UNESCO, "Madrid action plan for biosphere reserves (2008-2013)"

26 Worton, B. J., "Kernel methods for estimating the utilisation distribution in home-range studies" 70 : 164-168, 1989

27 Naidoo, R., "Integrating economic costs into conservation planning" 21 : 681-687, 2006

28 Kleyer, M., "Habitat network schemes in Stuttgart" Elsevier 249-272, 1994

29 Dudley, N., "Guidelines for applying protected area management categories"

30 Solnetsev, N. A., "Foundation papers in landscape ecology" Columbia University Press 19-27, 2007

31 Jo, T. D., "Focused on nature preservation zone and natural environment zone of national parks : A Study for the improvement of the zoning of nature parks of Korea" 32 : 185-202, 1997

32 Crawford, B. R., "Factors influencing progress in establishing community-based marine protected areas in Indonesia" 34 : 39-64, 2006

33 Berkes, F., "Exploring the basic ecological unit: Ecosystem-like concepts in traditional societies" 1 : 409-415, 1998

34 Loucks, C., "Explaining the global pattern of protected area coverage : Relative importance of vertebrate biodiversity, human activities and agricultural suitability" 35 : 1337-1348, 2008

35 Reyers, B. J., "Expanding the conservation toolbox :Conservation planning of multifunctional landscapes" 27 : 1121-1134, 2012

36 Hull, V., "Evaluating the efficacy of zoning designations for protected area management" 144 : 3028-3037, 2011

37 Horton, R. E., "Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydro-physical approach to quantitative morphology" 56 : 275-370, 1945

38 Schaller, J., "Environmental impact of proposal site for 1992 winter games in Berchtesgaden"

39 Tjallingii, S. P., "Enkele opmerkingen over het begrip ekotoop" 8 : 31-35, 1976

40 Stewart, R., "Efficiency, costs and trade-offs in marine reserve system design" 10 : 203-213, 2005

41 Klein, C. J., "Effectiveness of marine reserve networks in representing biodiversity and minimizing impact to fishermen : A Comparison of two approaches used in California" 1 : 44-51, 2008

42 Kim, J. H., "Ecological land use planning considering the characteristic of urban ecosystem : A Case study of Hanam, Kyeonggi province" University of Seoul 2005

43 Carwardine, J., "Cost-effective priorities for global mammal conservation" 105 : 11446-11450, 2008

44 Wilson, K. A., "Conserving biodiversity in production landscapes" 20 : 1721-1732, 2010

45 Watson, J. E. M., "Conservation biogeograph" Wiley-Blackwell 136-160, 2011

46 Lee, C. H., "Comparison of topographic, vegetation, scenic resource distribution between natural preservation zone and natural environment zone in Mt. Teogyu National Park" 7 (7): 49-61, 1998

47 Pressey, R. L., "Approaches to landscape- and seascape-scale conservation planning : Convergence, contrasts and challenges" 43 : 464-475, 2009

48 Knight, A. T., "An Operational model for implementing conservation action" 20 : 408-419, 2006