국내 원전부지 지진재해도 평가를 위한 제언 = Suggestion on Seismic Hazard Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Sites in Korea

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Issues with past practice in seismic hazard analysis of nuclear power plant sites in Korea are addressed. Brief review on both deterministic and probabilistic methods in seismic hazard analysis is given, and most of the continuing discussion is focussed on the probabilistic seismic hazard analysis. Causes of uncertainty are traced on the basis of the cases that the assessment methodology was applied to the nuclear power plant sites. Considerations on the assessment include the role of experts, a representative seismic catalog, seismic source zonation, earthquake ground-motion relationship, and evaluation process. Factors increasing uncertainty in each item are analyzed and some feasible solutions are discussed.

국문 초록 (Abstract)

국내 원전부지 지진재해도 평가 경험을 바탕으로 향후 지진재해도 평가 시 보다 정량적인 평가를 위하여 고려하여야 할 사항에 대하여 점검하였다. 지진재해도 평가 방법을 양분하는 것으로 알려진 결정론적 방법과 확률론적 방법에 대하여 간단히 소개하였으며, 대부분의 후속 논의는 확률론적 지진재해도 평가에 집중하였다. 이 평가를 국내 원전부지에 적용한 과거 사례를 토대로 제기된 불확실성의 원인을 추적하였다. 확률론적 지진재해도 평가의 고려사항으로 전문가의 역할, 대표지진목록 작성, 지진원 설정, 지진-지반운동 관계식 개발 및 지진재해도 평가 절차에 대하여 토의하였다. 각 주제별로 불확실성을 증가시키는 요인을 분석하고 국내 환경에 적합한 해결 방안을 토의하였다.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 국문초록
• 1. 서언
• 2. 확률론적 지진재해도 평가의 일반적인 특성
• 3. 확률론적 지진재해도 평가 고려 사항
• 4. 결론
• 사사
• References

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김광희, "The 12 September 2016 Gyeongju earthquakes: 2. Temporary seismic network for monitoring aftershocks" 한국지질과학협의회 20 (20): 753-757, 2016

2 김영희, "The 12 September 2016 Gyeongju earthquakes: 1. Observation and remaining questions" 한국지질과학협의회 20 (20): 747-752, 2016

3 Cao, T., "Seismic hazard estimation from background seismicity in southern California" 86 : 1372-1381, 1996

4 Abrahamson, N., "Seismic hazard assessment: problems with current practice and future developments" 2006

5 Kang, T.-S., "Role of expert panel in probabilistic seismic hazard analysis" Earthquake Engineering Society of Korea 21-22, 2014

6 SSHAC, "Recommendations for Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis: Guidance on Uncertainty and Use of Experts" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 256-, 1997

7 McGuire, R. K., "Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop" 85 (85): 1275-1284, 1993

8 KOPEC, "Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis for Sinwolseong 1 & 2 Nuclear Power Plant Site" Korea Power Electric Company 147-, 2003

9 강태섭, "Prediction of Strong Ground Motion in Moderate-Seismicity Regions Using Deterministic Earthquake Scenarios" 한국지진공학회 11 (11): 25-31, 2007

10 Keeney, R.L., "On the use of expert judgement on complex technical problems" 36 : 83-86, 1989

11 NRC, "Identification and Characterization of Seismic Sources and Determination of Safe Shutdown Earthquake Ground Motion, Regulatory Guide 1.165" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 45-, 1997

12 Otway, H., "Expert judgment in risk analysis and management: process, context, and pitfalls" 12 : 83-93, 1992

13 Keeney, R.L., "Eliciting probabilities from experts in complex technical problems" 38 : 191-201, 1991

14 Kafka, A.L., "Does the spatial distribution of smaller earthquakes delineate areas where larger earthquakes are likely to occur?" 90 : 724-738, 2000

15 McGuire, R.K., "Deterministic vs. probabilistic earthquake hazards and risks" 21 (21): 377-384, 2001

16 NRC, "Design Response Spectra for Seismic Design of Nuclear Power Plants, Regulatory Guide 1.60" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6-, 1973

17 NEMA, "Construction of Active Fault Map and Seismic Risk Map" National Emergency Management Agency 899-,

18 KHNP, "An Investigative Study on the Maximum Earthquake of Nuclear Power Plant Sites" Korea Hydro and Nuclear Power Company 402-,

19 NRC, "A Performance-Based Approach to Define the Site-Specific Earthquake Ground Motion, Regulatory Guide 1.208" U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 24-, 2007