공공건축 설계공모 이후 당선안 변경에 대한 관계자 인식 연구 - 발주자와 설계자 대상 설문조사를 중심으로 -

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study originated from the recognition that, while design competitions are the typical method for commissioning designs for public architecture projects, attention to subsequent stages is crucial to fulfill the competitions ultimate intent. Survey results from both clients and designers underscored the importance of internalizing the initial project plan regarding construction cost and duration. Continuous research considering the characteristics and life cycle of public building projects is necessary to establish basic data, such as reference cases and type-specific standards. Additionally, theres a need to rationalize current price standards and period calculation methods for architectural design work, and to establish a basis for smooth operation by specifying design change work and various procedures during the architectural design stage. Ensuring smooth communication among project participants and a consistent project management system is vital. Moreover, understanding the public building project process from a collaborative perspective and forming a common understanding of roles and responsibilities is essential. By verifying primary participants perceptions-clients and designers regarding changes throughout various project stages, this research underscores the need for systemic and academic improvements. The findings are expected to provide foundational data for future studies aiming to ensure rationality in post-design competition processes.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Abstract
• 1. 서론
• 2. 이론적 고찰
• 3. 조사 개요 및 분석 방법
• 4. 분석 결과
• 5. 결론 및 시사점
• REFERENCES