In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of...
In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of Poem writing、aesthetic feature and appraciation can be explored more deeply and specifically. In this way, the reasons why he had a sharp and critical attitude towards the theory of romantic charm are attempted to be found.
In chapter 2, by using poetry creation as the breakthrough point, it is revealed that Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory is focused on its absence of “tempermament”. However, the study on Wang Shizhen’s works of poetry comment, such as 《Dai Jing Tang Shi Hua》, gives a different conclusion. Wang’s concept of “tempermament” is not as narrow as Bian had criticized.
Then, by analyzing and summarizing the idea about “tempermament” which Bian has presented in his work, along with Du Fu’s metrical verses, which were classified as the works of “tempermament” or “romantic charm”. Comparing with Wang’s concept of “tempermament”, Bian’s is obviously narrower, and the spirits of two are distinctly different, which leads to the principal reason of his refutation of romantic charm theory.
In chapter 3, Bian’s refutation on the idea that Poems of “romantic charm” cannot be interpreted is introduced and discoursed. His propose of “unfolding the concealed meaning”, as a matter of fact, is an appreciation theory which inherited from his concept of “tempermament”. Finally, specific examples were given to experience how Bian was “unfolding the concealed meaning”.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 徐 星, "邊連寶詩學理論與詩歌創作研究" 南京師範大學 2016
2 韓成武, "邊連寶與 《杜律啟蒙》" 長沙學院 20 : 2006
3 王 穎, "邊連寶 《杜律啟蒙》研究" 河北師範大學 2011
4 廣東, "辭源" 商務印書館 2001
5 張金明, "論北隨園邊連寶其人其詩" 深圳大學 24 : 2007
6 金進暎, "翁方綱의 漁洋神韻說批評" 부산외국어대학교 10 : 1992
7 邊連寶, "病馀長語" 齊魯書社 2013
8 蔣 寅, "王漁洋與康熙詩壇" 鳳凰出版社 2013
9 劉青松, "清畿輔詩人邊連寶、戈濤詩歌理論初探" 吉林大学中国文化研究所 44 : 2015
10 蕭滌非, "杜甫全集校注" 人民文學出版社 2014
1 徐 星, "邊連寶詩學理論與詩歌創作研究" 南京師範大學 2016
2 韓成武, "邊連寶與 《杜律啟蒙》" 長沙學院 20 : 2006
3 王 穎, "邊連寶 《杜律啟蒙》研究" 河北師範大學 2011
4 廣東, "辭源" 商務印書館 2001
5 張金明, "論北隨園邊連寶其人其詩" 深圳大學 24 : 2007
6 金進暎, "翁方綱의 漁洋神韻說批評" 부산외국어대학교 10 : 1992
7 邊連寶, "病馀長語" 齊魯書社 2013
8 蔣 寅, "王漁洋與康熙詩壇" 鳳凰出版社 2013
9 劉青松, "清畿輔詩人邊連寶、戈濤詩歌理論初探" 吉林大学中国文化研究所 44 : 2015
10 蕭滌非, "杜甫全集校注" 人民文學出版社 2014
11 邊連寶, "杜律啟蒙" 齊魯書社 2005
12 王士禛, "帶經堂詩話" 人民文学出版社 1998
13 魏彩雲, "嚴羽 “興趣”說研究綜述" 韶關學院 31 : 2010
14 韓 勝, "南北隨園詩論對比研究" 河北大學 2002
15 頡 斌, "北隨園詩論" 河北大學 2000
백거이(白居易) 백운배율(百韻排律)의 특징 고찰 - 장법(章法) 분석을 중심으로
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
1999-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.26 | 0.26 | 0.29 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.28 | 0.32 | 0.635 | 0.21 |