RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      借《杜律啟蒙》對邊連寶批 “神韻說”之因再剖析 = A re analysis of Bian Lianbao’s refutation of romantic charm theory based on Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A105027746

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of...

      In this papers, the reasons for Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory are re analyzed by means of his work Rudimentary knowledge of Du Fu’s metrical verses. Through Bian’s interpretations, his pursuing for the gist of poems and his ideas of Poem writing、aesthetic feature and appraciation can be explored more deeply and specifically. In this way, the reasons why he had a sharp and critical attitude towards the theory of romantic charm are attempted to be found.
      In chapter 2, by using poetry creation as the breakthrough point, it is revealed that Bian’s refutation of romantic charm theory is focused on its absence of “tempermament”. However, the study on Wang Shizhen’s works of poetry comment, such as 《Dai Jing Tang Shi Hua》, gives a different conclusion. Wang’s concept of “tempermament” is not as narrow as Bian had criticized.
      Then, by analyzing and summarizing the idea about “tempermament” which Bian has presented in his work, along with Du Fu’s metrical verses, which were classified as the works of “tempermament” or “romantic charm”. Comparing with Wang’s concept of “tempermament”, Bian’s is obviously narrower, and the spirits of two are distinctly different, which leads to the principal reason of his refutation of romantic charm theory.
      In chapter 3, Bian’s refutation on the idea that Poems of “romantic charm” cannot be interpreted is introduced and discoursed. His propose of “unfolding the concealed meaning”, as a matter of fact, is an appreciation theory which inherited from his concept of “tempermament”. Finally, specific examples were given to experience how Bian was “unfolding the concealed meaning”.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 徐 星, "邊連寶詩學理論與詩歌創作研究" 南京師範大學 2016

      2 韓成武, "邊連寶與 《杜律啟蒙》" 長沙學院 20 : 2006

      3 王 穎, "邊連寶 《杜律啟蒙》研究" 河北師範大學 2011

      4 廣東, "辭源" 商務印書館 2001

      5 張金明, "論北隨園邊連寶其人其詩" 深圳大學 24 : 2007

      6 金進暎, "翁方綱의 漁洋神韻說批評" 부산외국어대학교 10 : 1992

      7 邊連寶, "病馀長語" 齊魯書社 2013

      8 蔣 寅, "王漁洋與康熙詩壇" 鳳凰出版社 2013

      9 劉青松, "清畿輔詩人邊連寶、戈濤詩歌理論初探" 吉林大学中国文化研究所 44 : 2015

      10 蕭滌非, "杜甫全集校注" 人民文學出版社 2014

      1 徐 星, "邊連寶詩學理論與詩歌創作研究" 南京師範大學 2016

      2 韓成武, "邊連寶與 《杜律啟蒙》" 長沙學院 20 : 2006

      3 王 穎, "邊連寶 《杜律啟蒙》研究" 河北師範大學 2011

      4 廣東, "辭源" 商務印書館 2001

      5 張金明, "論北隨園邊連寶其人其詩" 深圳大學 24 : 2007

      6 金進暎, "翁方綱의 漁洋神韻說批評" 부산외국어대학교 10 : 1992

      7 邊連寶, "病馀長語" 齊魯書社 2013

      8 蔣 寅, "王漁洋與康熙詩壇" 鳳凰出版社 2013

      9 劉青松, "清畿輔詩人邊連寶、戈濤詩歌理論初探" 吉林大学中国文化研究所 44 : 2015

      10 蕭滌非, "杜甫全集校注" 人民文學出版社 2014

      11 邊連寶, "杜律啟蒙" 齊魯書社 2005

      12 王士禛, "帶經堂詩話" 人民文学出版社 1998

      13 魏彩雲, "嚴羽 “興趣”說研究綜述" 韶關學院 31 : 2010

      14 韓 勝, "南北隨園詩論對比研究" 河北大學 2002

      15 頡 斌, "北隨園詩論" 河北大學 2000

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.26 0.26 0.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.28 0.32 0.635 0.21
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼