RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      플롯 없는 소설: 도로시 리차드슨의 『순례』에 나타난 지루함과 모더니스트 독자 = A Novel without a Plot: Modernist Readership and Boredom in Dorothy Richardson`s Pilgrimage

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104184934

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Dorothy Richardson`s thirteen-volume novel Pilgrimage presents a single woman`s life as a continuous process without offering any traditional sense of resolution or ending. With its emphasis on detail and with its use of unpunctuated prose, the novel gained the reputation of being unreadable and was criticized for generating boredom. Drawing attention to its serial form and style, this essay investigates how Richardson`s literary experiment constructs a new type of reading subject whose relation to textual space should be different from that of the nineteenth-century readers. In her pursuit of serial form in depicting the portrait of an artist as a young woman, Richardson thematizes boredom as integral to her feminist strategies to express critical dissent from dominant narratives of gender. Through her essay “About Punctuation,” her preface to Pilgrimage, and scenes of reading in the novel, Richardson argues that “feminine prose” distinguished from nineteenth-century masculine realism should be properly unpunctuated to the extent that one`s reading speed must be encumbered so that readers can question norms implicated in standard punctuation. Promoting “the slow, attentive reading” by using experimental punctuation and detail, Richardson`s prose style highlights readers` creative collaboration and allows readers to experience non-homogenous temporalities and spatialities. Richardson`s aesthetics of slowness serves to constitute modernist readers, who were required to adopt a new reading strategy to overcome boredom while encountering unreadable texts and to appreciate aesthetic values of new modes of writing though active participation in textual production.
      번역하기

      Dorothy Richardson`s thirteen-volume novel Pilgrimage presents a single woman`s life as a continuous process without offering any traditional sense of resolution or ending. With its emphasis on detail and with its use of unpunctuated prose, the novel ...

      Dorothy Richardson`s thirteen-volume novel Pilgrimage presents a single woman`s life as a continuous process without offering any traditional sense of resolution or ending. With its emphasis on detail and with its use of unpunctuated prose, the novel gained the reputation of being unreadable and was criticized for generating boredom. Drawing attention to its serial form and style, this essay investigates how Richardson`s literary experiment constructs a new type of reading subject whose relation to textual space should be different from that of the nineteenth-century readers. In her pursuit of serial form in depicting the portrait of an artist as a young woman, Richardson thematizes boredom as integral to her feminist strategies to express critical dissent from dominant narratives of gender. Through her essay “About Punctuation,” her preface to Pilgrimage, and scenes of reading in the novel, Richardson argues that “feminine prose” distinguished from nineteenth-century masculine realism should be properly unpunctuated to the extent that one`s reading speed must be encumbered so that readers can question norms implicated in standard punctuation. Promoting “the slow, attentive reading” by using experimental punctuation and detail, Richardson`s prose style highlights readers` creative collaboration and allows readers to experience non-homogenous temporalities and spatialities. Richardson`s aesthetics of slowness serves to constitute modernist readers, who were required to adopt a new reading strategy to overcome boredom while encountering unreadable texts and to appreciate aesthetic values of new modes of writing though active participation in textual production.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 DuPlessis, Rachel Blau, "Writing Beyond the Ending : Narrative Strategies of Twentieth-Century Women Writers" Indiana UP 1985

      2 Richardson, Dorothy, "Windows on Modernism : Selected Letters of Dorothy Richardson" U of Georgia P 1995

      3 Richardson, Dorothy, "The Tunnel" Broadview 368-373, 2014

      4 Rodker, John, "The Tunnel" Broadview 327-329, 2014

      5 Richardson, Dorothy, "The Tunnel" Broadview 339-344, 2014

      6 Iser, Wolfgang, "The Implied Reader : Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett" Johns Hopkins UP 1978

      7 Flint, Kate, "The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian Novel" Cambridge UP 17-36, 2001

      8 Crary, Jonathan, "Suspensions of Perception : Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture" MIT Press 1999

      9 Woolf, Virginia, "Review of The Tunnel. The Tunnel" Broadview 325-327, 2014

      10 Mansfield, Katherine, "Review of The Tunnel. The Tunnel" Broadview 329-330, 2014

      1 DuPlessis, Rachel Blau, "Writing Beyond the Ending : Narrative Strategies of Twentieth-Century Women Writers" Indiana UP 1985

      2 Richardson, Dorothy, "Windows on Modernism : Selected Letters of Dorothy Richardson" U of Georgia P 1995

      3 Richardson, Dorothy, "The Tunnel" Broadview 368-373, 2014

      4 Rodker, John, "The Tunnel" Broadview 327-329, 2014

      5 Richardson, Dorothy, "The Tunnel" Broadview 339-344, 2014

      6 Iser, Wolfgang, "The Implied Reader : Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett" Johns Hopkins UP 1978

      7 Flint, Kate, "The Cambridge Companion to the Victorian Novel" Cambridge UP 17-36, 2001

      8 Crary, Jonathan, "Suspensions of Perception : Attention, Spectacle, and Modern Culture" MIT Press 1999

      9 Woolf, Virginia, "Review of The Tunnel. The Tunnel" Broadview 325-327, 2014

      10 Mansfield, Katherine, "Review of The Tunnel. The Tunnel" Broadview 329-330, 2014

      11 Richardson, Dorothy, "Pilgrimage. Vol. 2" Virago 1979

      12 Richardson, Dorothy, "Pilgrimage. Vol. 1" Virago 1979

      13 Richardson, Dorothy, "Pilgrimage. Vol. 1" Virago 9-12, 1938

      14 Koepnick, Lutz, "On Slowness : Toward an Aesthetic of the Contemporary" Columbia UP 2014

      15 Langbauer, Laurie, "Novels of Everyday Life : The Series in English Fiction, 1850-1930" Cornell UP 1999

      16 Gevirtz, Susan, "Narrative’s Journey: The Fiction and Film Writing of Dorothy Richardson" Peter Lang 1996

      17 Pease, Allison, "Modernism, Feminism, and the Culture of Boredom" Cambridge UP 2012

      18 Rosner, Victoria, "Modernism and the Architecture of Private Life" Columbia UP 2005

      19 Levenson, Michael, "Modernism" Yale UP 2011

      20 Ross, Stephen, "Introduction. Pointed Roofs" Broadview 9-42, 2014

      21 Barthes, Roland, "Image-Music-Text" Hill and Wang 1978

      22 Fromm, Gloria, "General Introduction. Windows on Modernism: Selected Letters of Dorothy Richardson" U of Georgia P xvii-xxiv, 1995

      23 Mepham, John., "Dorothy Richardson’s ‘Unreadability’: Graphic Style and Narrative Strategy in a Modernist Novel" 43 (43): 449-464, 2000

      24 Lindskog, Annika J., "Dorothy Richardson and the Grammar of the Mind" 6 : 6-24, 2013

      25 Radford, Jean, "Dorothy Richardson" Indiana UP 1991

      26 Showalter, Elaine, "A Literature of Their Own: British Women Novelists from Brontë to Lessing" Princeton UP 1977

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-06-15 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society For Feminist Studies In English Literature -> The Korean Association For Feminist Studies in English Literature KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2001-07-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      1999-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.18 0.18 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.11 0.1 0.406 0
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼