한자 편방(偏旁) 분석에 대한 고찰

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Thereafter the development of the Chinese character component analysis by Wu-Dacheng and Sun-Yirang made huge contribution in making Chinese Graphonomy one of a kind it’s field. With the appearance of the Chinese character component analysis, the time period and locality of ancient texts were able to be brought to light and a system of analysis for ancient writing able to be established. Using the Chinese character component analysis for the first time Sun-Yirang showed an objective model of research for ancient writing and analysis oriented on character types from inscriptions on bones and tortoise carapaces being compared to those on epigraphs. Tang-Lan highlighted the significance of the Chinese character component analysis as the first to propose a subject for research concerning and to present the meaning and scope of Chinese ancient writing. Using Tan-Lan’s theory as a basis, Rong-Yuchun introduced in detail three uses of the Chinese character component analysis. He-Linyi gained the attention of the Warring State Period concerning characters and used the existing Chinese character component analysis in an adaptable fashion.
I introduced supplementary 4 points to consider when analyzing an author from Chinese character component along with the existing Chinese character component analysis. Firstly was the interpretation method of unpacking the sentence and reading it by applying direct transcription and modern character transcription concurrently. Secondly was the interpretation method of characters based upon the movement of the brush on silk and bamboo strips. Thirdly was the necessity of analysis of characters by basic-factor elements present in the fundamental composition of Chinese characters. Fourthly was differentiating the shibi(饰笔) did not accompany the meaning and phonetics.
If the aforementioned 4 points are considered during interpretation, a more objective conclusion may be drawn and anticipated.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 1. 들어가며
• 2. 편방 분석법에 대한 기존 학자들의 견해
• 3. 편방 분석에서 추가로 고려해야할 점
• 4. 결론
• 〈參考文獻〉
• 〈ABSTRACT〉

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 이승률, "이승률 교수의 ‘간백’ 강의 (1) <간백연구서설>" 15 : 199-229, 2006

2 荊门市博物馆, "郭店楚墓竹簡" 文物出版社 1998

3 王寧, "漢字學槪要" 北京師範大學出版社 2001

4 清華大學出土文獻研究與保護中心, "清華大學藏戰國竹簡『保訓』釋文" (6) : 2009

5 寥明春, "楚簡『周易』校釋記(一)" 2004

6 何琳儀, "戰國文字通論" 江蘇敎育出版社 2003

7 劉釗, "古文字構形學" 福建人民出版社 2006

8 唐蘭, "古文字學導論" 齊魯書社 1981

9 李學勤, "古文字學初階" 中華書局 1985

10 龍宇純, "中國文字學" 臺灣學生書局 1982

11 編纂委員會, "『續修四庫全書』 906卷" 上海古籍出版社 2002

12 歐陽禎人, "『三德』中的儒家思想初探"