RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      회계비리 근절을 위한 내부통제 개선 연구: 여수시 횡령사건을 중심으로 = Improving Internal Controls to Prevent Accounting Frauds: An Embezzlement Case in Yeosu City Government

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99789502

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate internal controls in local governments and suggest how to improve the accounting control system, especially focused on an embezzlement case involving a low-ranking public official in Yeosu City Government. Through evaluating internal controls in Yeosu City Government, based on five elements of internal control, it was found that internal control system did not work at all in Yeosu City Government. The findings are as follows: (ⅰ) Despite the importance of a strong internal control environment, the government`s internal controls became weak because local high-ranking officials took the lead in committing an irregularity. (ⅱ) Before opening the Expo 2012, the government did not evaluate and manage internal and external risks associated with accounting operations. (ⅲ) Due to the lack of segregation of duties, one public official was in complete control of the situation regarding the entire accounting transaction, resulted in significant financial loss. Accounting Information System, namely e-Hojo, was circumvented by hand work. Besides, control activities including reconciliation was performed as a mere formality. (ⅳ) Formal and informal information and communication system was not successful. (v) Top management did not periodically review and evaluate internal control system. As a result, such overall weak system of internal control incurred the embezzlement case of Yeosu City Government. Therefore it could be urgent for local governments to effectively establish and maintain internal control mechanisms that are necessary to prevent accounting fraud.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate internal controls in local governments and suggest how to improve the accounting control system, especially focused on an embezzlement case involving a low-ranking public official in Yeosu City Government. Thro...

      The purpose of this study is to evaluate internal controls in local governments and suggest how to improve the accounting control system, especially focused on an embezzlement case involving a low-ranking public official in Yeosu City Government. Through evaluating internal controls in Yeosu City Government, based on five elements of internal control, it was found that internal control system did not work at all in Yeosu City Government. The findings are as follows: (ⅰ) Despite the importance of a strong internal control environment, the government`s internal controls became weak because local high-ranking officials took the lead in committing an irregularity. (ⅱ) Before opening the Expo 2012, the government did not evaluate and manage internal and external risks associated with accounting operations. (ⅲ) Due to the lack of segregation of duties, one public official was in complete control of the situation regarding the entire accounting transaction, resulted in significant financial loss. Accounting Information System, namely e-Hojo, was circumvented by hand work. Besides, control activities including reconciliation was performed as a mere formality. (ⅳ) Formal and informal information and communication system was not successful. (v) Top management did not periodically review and evaluate internal control system. As a result, such overall weak system of internal control incurred the embezzlement case of Yeosu City Government. Therefore it could be urgent for local governments to effectively establish and maintain internal control mechanisms that are necessary to prevent accounting fraud.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 강인옥, "회계관계직원의 책임" 광문각 2010

      2 박희정, "환경변화에 따른 직무감찰체계 개선방안" 감사연구원 2012

      3 광주지방검찰청 순청지청, "허술한 재무관리시스템"

      4 이승종, "행정통제" 69-77, 2000

      5 이창균, "지방재정운영의 자율적 통제시스템에 관한 인식 연구" 한국지방행정연구원 26 (26): 207-236, 2012

      6 이병철, "지방재정시스템: 계약관리 서브시스템 진단분석" 2013

      7 정성호, "지방자치단체의 회계부정실태와 통제방안" 한국지방행정연구원 26 (26): 135-158, 2012

      8 감사연구원, "지방자치단체 토착비리 실태분석" 감사연구원 2012

      9 "지방자치단체 재무회계규칙"

      10 행정안전부 보도자료, "지방자치단체 자율적 내부통제 에비 운영"

      1 강인옥, "회계관계직원의 책임" 광문각 2010

      2 박희정, "환경변화에 따른 직무감찰체계 개선방안" 감사연구원 2012

      3 광주지방검찰청 순청지청, "허술한 재무관리시스템"

      4 이승종, "행정통제" 69-77, 2000

      5 이창균, "지방재정운영의 자율적 통제시스템에 관한 인식 연구" 한국지방행정연구원 26 (26): 207-236, 2012

      6 이병철, "지방재정시스템: 계약관리 서브시스템 진단분석" 2013

      7 정성호, "지방자치단체의 회계부정실태와 통제방안" 한국지방행정연구원 26 (26): 135-158, 2012

      8 감사연구원, "지방자치단체 토착비리 실태분석" 감사연구원 2012

      9 "지방자치단체 재무회계규칙"

      10 행정안전부 보도자료, "지방자치단체 자율적 내부통제 에비 운영"

      11 행정안전부 보도자료, "지방공무원 회계비리 방지대책 추진"

      12 "지방공무원 임용령"

      13 감사원, "재정누수관련 취약분야 비리점검" 감사원 2013

      14 이종운, "자체감사기구의 내부통제 자체평가시스템 구축 및 운영. 계간 감사" 감사원 2006

      15 "여수시 재무회계규칙"

      16 행정안전부 보도자료, "비리공무원 징계시 수수액의 5배이내 징계부가금 병과"

      17 변중석, "내부통제리스크평가" 한국내부통제평가원 2013

      18 박종구, "내부공모 부패구조와 내부통제체계" 7 (7): 83-119, 2001

      19 이병철, "공공부문의 내부통제 현주소와 바람직한 방향" 2012

      20 文浩承, "공공부문 내부통제에 관한 연구" 弘益大學校 稅務大學院 1998

      21 감사원, "감사원이 바라본 지방자치" 감사원 2012

      22 KPMG, "Who Is the Typical Fraudster?"

      23 Murphy, D. S., "The SAI and Anti-Corruption Initiatives"

      24 Internal Control Task Force, "The New York State Internal Control Act Implementation Guide"

      25 AMF, "The Internal Control System: Reference Framework" AMF 2007

      26 Fertakis, J. P., "The Design and Implementation of Administrative Controls" Quorum Books 1989

      27 GAO, "Strategies to Manage Improper Payments" General Accounting Office 2001

      28 Sawyer, L. B., "Sawyer’s Internal Auditing" Institute of Internal Auditors 1988

      29 ACFE, "Report to the Nation on Occupational Fraud and Abuse" ACFE 2012

      30 Jones, R., "Public Sector Accounting" Pearson 2000

      31 Cohen, Alain-Gérard, "Public Internal Financial Control" The IIA Research Foundation 2007

      32 Dechow, P. M., "Predicting material accounting manipulations" University of California-Berkeley 2007

      33 Cressey, Donald R., "Other People’s Money" Patterson Smith 1973

      34 Laudon, K., "Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm" Prentice Hall 2006

      35 OECD, "Management Control in Modern Government Administration" OECD Publishing 1996

      36 Grant Thornton, "Looking to the future: Perspectives and trends from internal audit leaders" Chief Audit Executive Survey 2011

      37 Hoos, F., "Is accountability a double-edged sword? Experimental evidence on the effectiveness of internal controls to prevent fraud" 23 (23): 115-132, 2012

      38 Caplan, D., "Internal Controls and the Detection of Management Fraud" 37 (37): 101-117, 1999

      39 Graham, L., "Internal Controls" John Wiley & Sons 2008

      40 COSO, "Internal Control-Integrated Framework"

      41 World Bank, "Helping Countries Combat Corruption: The Role of the World Bank" World Bank 1997

      42 Kroll Advisory Solutions, "Global Fraud Report" 2012

      43 Carcello, Joseph V., "Fraudulent Financial Reporting: How Do We Close the Knowledge Gap?"

      44 KPMG Peat Marwick, "Fraud Survey Results-1993" KPMG Peat Marwick 1993

      45 HM Treasury, "Fraud Report 2006-2007" 2007

      46 FMF, "Financial Accountability Handbook"

      47 PWC, "Fighting fraud in government"

      48 PWC, "Cutting costs and cutting fraud"

      49 European Commission, "Compendium of the public internal control systems in the EU Member States" 2012

      50 INTOSAI, "Code of Ethics and Auditing Standards"

      51 Trebesh, M. F., "Business Management: Fraud and Internal Control"

      52 Beasley, M. S., "An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director independence and financial statement fraud" 71 (71): 443-365, 1996

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-09-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Korea Reasearch Institute for Local Administration -> Korea Research Institute for Local Administration KCI등재후보
      2005-09-06 학술지등록 한글명 : 지방행정연구
      외국어명 : The Korea Local Administration Review
      KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.21 1.21 1.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.09 1.07 1.285 0.33
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼