RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      분쟁서사 <뮌헨>에 나타난 인종적 재현 연구 = On the Racial Representation of the Israel-Palestine Conflicts in Munich

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104216398

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Even before its release, Munich caused hot controversies among the movie critics, who were polarized into two camps: one criticized the movie for its alleged attitude of ‘moral equivalence’ towards the Palestinian terrorists and the Israeli counter-terrorists while the other praised it for its unbiased treatment of the two antagonistic groups. This paper assesses the current criticism on this movie by examining the racial representations of the two ethnic groups. It also analyzes the various methods by which the director tries to ‘re-humanize’ the often-demonized two parties. Although the humanity of Palestinian terrorists as well as that of the Israelis is emphasized in this movie, the emphasis itself is very much lopsided. The movie ends up successfully constructing the image of a nonconformist, diasporic Jew, which, this paper argues, not only constitutes its forte but also its limitation. This cinematic maneuver can be regarded as a great achievement in that it articulates a dissident voice within the supposedly homogeneous political entity of the Israeli Jews. At the same time, it runs the risk of undermining, or even foreclosing, possible critiques of the state terrorism of Israel by emphasizing a ‘reformed’ conscientious Jewish subject. What makes the matter worse is that the political insights into the history of the territorial issue, as soon as they surface, are drowned due to the shift of the cinematic focus from the politics of (counter-) terrorism to the psychological and moral dimensions typical of morality plays.
      번역하기

      Even before its release, Munich caused hot controversies among the movie critics, who were polarized into two camps: one criticized the movie for its alleged attitude of ‘moral equivalence’ towards the Palestinian terrorists and the Israeli counte...

      Even before its release, Munich caused hot controversies among the movie critics, who were polarized into two camps: one criticized the movie for its alleged attitude of ‘moral equivalence’ towards the Palestinian terrorists and the Israeli counter-terrorists while the other praised it for its unbiased treatment of the two antagonistic groups. This paper assesses the current criticism on this movie by examining the racial representations of the two ethnic groups. It also analyzes the various methods by which the director tries to ‘re-humanize’ the often-demonized two parties. Although the humanity of Palestinian terrorists as well as that of the Israelis is emphasized in this movie, the emphasis itself is very much lopsided. The movie ends up successfully constructing the image of a nonconformist, diasporic Jew, which, this paper argues, not only constitutes its forte but also its limitation. This cinematic maneuver can be regarded as a great achievement in that it articulates a dissident voice within the supposedly homogeneous political entity of the Israeli Jews. At the same time, it runs the risk of undermining, or even foreclosing, possible critiques of the state terrorism of Israel by emphasizing a ‘reformed’ conscientious Jewish subject. What makes the matter worse is that the political insights into the history of the territorial issue, as soon as they surface, are drowned due to the shift of the cinematic focus from the politics of (counter-) terrorism to the psychological and moral dimensions typical of morality plays.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Brooks, David, "What ‘Munich’ Left Out"

      2 Sherman, Gary, "Wanted: Dead or Alive"

      3 Jonas, George, "Vengeance: The True Story of an Israeli Counte-Terrorist Team" Simon & Shuster 1984

      4 Sieman, Henry, "The Killing Equation" The New York Review of Books

      5 Glieberman, Owen, "The Killer Elite" 855 : 58-59, 2005

      6 Anderson, Michael, "Sword of Gideon"

      7 Brownfeld, Alan C, "Spielberg’s ‘Munich’ Continues to Stir Debate, Soul-Searching about Israel Policies" 25 (25): 56-57, 2006

      8 Shoenfeld, Gabriel, "Spielberg’s ‘Munich"

      9 Abu-Assad, Hani, "Paradise Now"

      10 Said, Edward, "Orientalism" Random House 1979

      1 Brooks, David, "What ‘Munich’ Left Out"

      2 Sherman, Gary, "Wanted: Dead or Alive"

      3 Jonas, George, "Vengeance: The True Story of an Israeli Counte-Terrorist Team" Simon & Shuster 1984

      4 Sieman, Henry, "The Killing Equation" The New York Review of Books

      5 Glieberman, Owen, "The Killer Elite" 855 : 58-59, 2005

      6 Anderson, Michael, "Sword of Gideon"

      7 Brownfeld, Alan C, "Spielberg’s ‘Munich’ Continues to Stir Debate, Soul-Searching about Israel Policies" 25 (25): 56-57, 2006

      8 Shoenfeld, Gabriel, "Spielberg’s ‘Munich"

      9 Abu-Assad, Hani, "Paradise Now"

      10 Said, Edward, "Orientalism" Random House 1979

      11 Medved, Michael, "Munich’ distorts history" USA Today

      12 Spielberg, Steven, "Munich. Perf"

      13 Fox, Michael, "Israeli-Palestinian cycle of violence gets the Spielberg treatment"

      14 Schickel, Richard, "His ‘Prayer for Peace" Time

      15 Nieland, Justus, "Everybody’s Noir Humanism: Chester Himes, Lonely Crusade, and the Quality of Hurt" 43 (43): 225-231, 2009

      16 Kushner, Tony, "Defending ‘Munich’ to My Mishpocheh" Los Angeles Times

      17 Dabashi, Hamid, "Brown Skin, White Masks" Pluto 2011

      18 Shaheen, Jack G, "Arabs and Muslims in Hollywood’s ‘Munich’ and ‘Syriana" 25 (25): 73-, 2006

      19 Graham, William A, "21 Hours at Munich"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2019-08-06 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Association Of Literature And Film -> The Korean Association Of Literature and Film KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.17 0.17 0.2
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.26 0.491 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼