RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      일본 중학교 역사교과서의 古代史 서술과 歷史認識 = Descriptions of Ancient History Contained in the Japanese History Textbooks for Middle School Student and Japans Perception of History

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A76535932

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The descriptions found in the Japanese history textbooks for middle school students have tended to promote Japan's supposed superiority. In particular, the New History Textbook published by Husosha Publishers includes errant descriptions of historical truths, as well as elitist and self-righteous unilateralism-based approaches to history.
      The ethnocentric ideology evident in these Japanese history textbooks has its origins in the unique Japanese mindset stemming from the political ideology of the imperial system which was established in the 8<SUP>th</SUP> century. In order to establish this imperial system-based ideology, Japan compiled the Nihon shoki (日本書紀, Chronicles of Japan) which was designed to justify the legitimacy and eternal nature of the imperial system. This work included the fabrications that the ancient Korean kingdoms were tributary states of Japan and distorted perceptions of history.
      This kind of beliefs first formed in the ancient era were passed down from generation to generation and were eventually consolidated as the Japanese ruling class belief in the political ideology of Hwangguk sakwan (皇國史觀,), which emerged at the end of 19<SUP>th</SUP> century when the Restoration of the Emperor was carried out. These errant descriptions of the relationship with ancient Korean kingdoms and Japan's perception of history is based on a long-enduring attempt to distort history. This kind of perception has also influenced their descriptions of cultural history. Totally ignoring the roles of the Korean peninsula, Japan has belittled the culture which developed in Korea by positioning itself as the conveyor of Chinese culture.
      Pride in one's country and the belief in the inherent superiority of one's national history are two totally different things. Such a self-righteous perception causes the regression of history, and leads to an unsure future. In this regards, in order to actualize peace and prosperity in East Asia, there is a need to educate future generations to have a more desirable perception of history.
      번역하기

      The descriptions found in the Japanese history textbooks for middle school students have tended to promote Japan's supposed superiority. In particular, the New History Textbook published by Husosha Publishers includes errant descriptions of historical...

      The descriptions found in the Japanese history textbooks for middle school students have tended to promote Japan's supposed superiority. In particular, the New History Textbook published by Husosha Publishers includes errant descriptions of historical truths, as well as elitist and self-righteous unilateralism-based approaches to history.
      The ethnocentric ideology evident in these Japanese history textbooks has its origins in the unique Japanese mindset stemming from the political ideology of the imperial system which was established in the 8<SUP>th</SUP> century. In order to establish this imperial system-based ideology, Japan compiled the Nihon shoki (日本書紀, Chronicles of Japan) which was designed to justify the legitimacy and eternal nature of the imperial system. This work included the fabrications that the ancient Korean kingdoms were tributary states of Japan and distorted perceptions of history.
      This kind of beliefs first formed in the ancient era were passed down from generation to generation and were eventually consolidated as the Japanese ruling class belief in the political ideology of Hwangguk sakwan (皇國史觀,), which emerged at the end of 19<SUP>th</SUP> century when the Restoration of the Emperor was carried out. These errant descriptions of the relationship with ancient Korean kingdoms and Japan's perception of history is based on a long-enduring attempt to distort history. This kind of perception has also influenced their descriptions of cultural history. Totally ignoring the roles of the Korean peninsula, Japan has belittled the culture which developed in Korea by positioning itself as the conveyor of Chinese culture.
      Pride in one's country and the belief in the inherent superiority of one's national history are two totally different things. Such a self-righteous perception causes the regression of history, and leads to an unsure future. In this regards, in order to actualize peace and prosperity in East Asia, there is a need to educate future generations to have a more desirable perception of history.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 주제별 서술과 문제점
      • Ⅲ. 교과서 서술에 나타난 歷史認識과 그 배경
      • Ⅳ. 결어
      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. 서언
      • Ⅱ. 주제별 서술과 문제점
      • Ⅲ. 교과서 서술에 나타난 歷史認識과 그 배경
      • Ⅳ. 결어
      • ABSTRACT
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2020 평가예정 계속평가 신청대상 (등재유지)
      2015-01-01 평가 우수등재학술지 선정 (재인증)
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.15 1.15 1.21
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.21 1.16 2.615 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼