RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS

      안구반응분석기를 이용한 원추각막의 생체역학인자 비교연구 = Biomechanical Property of Keratoconus Measured by ORA

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A100524627

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To compare the biomechanical properties of keratoconus, keratoconus suspect, and normal subjects measured by ocular response analyzer. Methods: A total of 72 patients were divided into 3 groups: keratoconus, suspected keratoconus, and normal ...

      Purpose: To compare the biomechanical properties of keratoconus, keratoconus suspect, and normal subjects measured by ocular response analyzer. Methods: A total of 72 patients were divided into 3 groups: keratoconus, suspected keratoconus, and normal control subjects. The 3 age-matched groups were evaluated according to age, sex, and visual acuity. Slit lamp examinations, Pentacam, and ocular response analyzer (ORA) examinations were performed. Mean corneal refractive power, central corneal thickness, corneal hysteresis (CH), and corneal resistance factor (CRF) were evaluated and analyzed. Results: Twenty-four eyes were included in each group. The mean age was 23.8 years in keratoconus, 26.0 years in suspected keratoconus and 26.1 years in normal subject groups. Mean corneal refractive power was significantly higher in keratoconus (p < 0.001) and suspected keratoconus (p = 0.001) groups than in the normal subject group. Mean central corneal thickness showed significant differences among the 3 groups (p < 0.05). CH was significantly lower in keratoconus than suspected keratoconus (p = 0.025) and normal subject groups (p = 0.005), but showed no significant difference between suspected keratoconus and normal subject groups. CRF showed significant differences among all 3 groups (p < 0.05). CH and CRF had negative correlations with mean corneal refractive power and positive correlations with central corneal thickness. Conclusions: CH and CRF measured by ORA were significantly different between keratoconus and normal subject groups and had significant correlations with mean corneal refractive power and central corneal thickness. CRF may be a useful method to differentiate between suspected keratoconus and normal cornea patients.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 김성욱, "정상 한국인 각막의 생체역학적 요소의 정상범위와 영향을 미치는 요인 분석" 대한안과학회 50 (50): 1605-1610, 2009

      2 Ambekar R, "Wagoner Johnson A. The effect of keratoconus on the structural, mechanical, and optical properties of the cornea" 4 : 223-236, 2011

      3 Lapid-Gortzak R, "Videokeratography findings in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis versus those of healthy children" 109 : 2018-2023, 2002

      4 Akhtar S, "Ultrastructural analysis of collagen fibrils and proteoglycans in keratoconus" 86 : 764-772, 2008

      5 Edrington TB, "Standardized rigid contact lens fitting protocol for keratoconus" 73 : 369-375, 1996

      6 Krumeich JH, "Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus" 24 : 456-463, 1998

      7 Mandell RB, "Keratoconus: spatial variation of corneal thickenss as a diagnostic test" 82 : 182-188, 1969

      8 Krachmer JH, "Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders" 28 : 293-322, 1984

      9 Rabinowitz YS, "Keratoconus" 42 : 297-319, 1998

      10 Rabinowitz YS, "KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus" 25 : 1327-1335, 1999

      1 김성욱, "정상 한국인 각막의 생체역학적 요소의 정상범위와 영향을 미치는 요인 분석" 대한안과학회 50 (50): 1605-1610, 2009

      2 Ambekar R, "Wagoner Johnson A. The effect of keratoconus on the structural, mechanical, and optical properties of the cornea" 4 : 223-236, 2011

      3 Lapid-Gortzak R, "Videokeratography findings in children with vernal keratoconjunctivitis versus those of healthy children" 109 : 2018-2023, 2002

      4 Akhtar S, "Ultrastructural analysis of collagen fibrils and proteoglycans in keratoconus" 86 : 764-772, 2008

      5 Edrington TB, "Standardized rigid contact lens fitting protocol for keratoconus" 73 : 369-375, 1996

      6 Krumeich JH, "Live-epikeratophakia for keratoconus" 24 : 456-463, 1998

      7 Mandell RB, "Keratoconus: spatial variation of corneal thickenss as a diagnostic test" 82 : 182-188, 1969

      8 Krachmer JH, "Keratoconus and related noninflammatory corneal thinning disorders" 28 : 293-322, 1984

      9 Rabinowitz YS, "Keratoconus" 42 : 297-319, 1998

      10 Rabinowitz YS, "KISA% index: a quantitative videokeratography algorithm embodying minimal topographic criteria for diagnosing keratoconus" 25 : 1327-1335, 1999

      11 Galletti JG, "Improved keratoconus detection by ocular response analyzer testing after consideration of corneal thickness as a confounding factor" 28 : 202-208, 2012

      12 Dupps WJ Jr, "Hysteresis: new mechanospeak for the ophthalmologist" 33 : 1499-1501, 2007

      13 Touboul D, "Early biomechanical keratoconus pattern measured with an ocular response analyzer: curve analysis" 37 : 2144-2150, 2011

      14 Luce DA, "Determining in vivo biomechanical properties of the cornea with an ocular response analyzer" 31 : 156-162, 2005

      15 Piñero DP, "Corneal volume, pachymetry, and correlation of anterior and posterior corneal shape in subclinical and different stages of clinical keratoconus" 36 : 814-825, 2010

      16 Edmund C, "Corneal elasticity and ocular rigidity in normal and keratoconic eyes" 66 : 134-140, 1988

      17 Schlegel Z, "Comparison of and correlation between anterior and posterior corneal elevation maps in normal eyes and keratoconus-suspect eyes" 34 : 789-795, 2008

      18 Wagner H, "Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study: methods and findings to date" 30 : 223-232, 2007

      19 Andreassen TT, "Biomechanical properties of keratoconus and normal corneas" 31 : 435-441, 1980

      20 Maeda N, "Automated keratoconus screening with corneal topography analysis" 35 : 2749-2757, 1994

      21 Shah S, "Assessment of the biomechanical properties of the cornea with the ocular response analyzer in normal and keratoconic eyes" 48 : 3026-3031, 2007

      22 Rabinowitz YS, "Accuracy of ultrasonic pachymetry and videokeratography in detecting keratoconus" 24 : 196-201, 1998

      23 Dastjerdi MH, "A quantitative corneal topography index for detection of keratoconus" 14 : 427-436, 1998

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.22 0.22 0.22
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.23 0.23 0.366 0.02
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼