『여씨춘추』의 道氣二元論적 宇宙論과 그 정치철학적 의미

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The goal of this article is to study the cosmology of the dualism of Dao-Qi(道氣二元論) in Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu(『呂氏春秋』) from a politico-philosophical perspective. And in this I also will search for reasons why didn`t adopt these the cosmology of the dualism of Dao-Qi to Qin-Shi-Huang(秦始皇). A fact, Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu recognized faults of the cosmology of Qi-Hua(氣化宇宙論) of Guan-Zi` four- chapters(『管子』4篇) and Jie-Guan-Zi(『?冠子』). For that reason Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu was changed to the dualism of Dao-Qi(道氣二元論). Nevertheless it didn`t adopt to Qin-Shi-Huang. According to the results of my research in these theme, I knew that Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu, as divide the difference of being of Dao(道) and Qi(氣), divided the difference of class of the power of an emperor and a subject which correspond to it. It was for secure the power of an emperor`s the discriminative differentiation and specialness and sanctity. This can see plainly to label the one(一) as like Dao(道). Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu make the one(一) as monarch(君主), and it was called him ``who govern the whole world`` and ``who join the whole world in one``. But as long as the premise of Lao-Zhuang`s the theory of Dao, it don`t be a place which assure an emperor`s absolute authority. Because the peculiarities of Dao is unintentional and purposeless. Then it don`t disclose it`s liking and disliking. Also if the power of a monarch and an emperor was naturally given through the influence of social contradiction, this also can`t be the theory which protect an emperor`s absolute authority. If another social contradiction come up, the power of an emperor who is still in power also will can be disqualified. Even if it is the dualism of Dao-Qi like Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu, the power of an emperor who is still in power also pass current, but at the same time, the power of a subject and feudal lords also pass current. Also going one step forward, actualities be that as it may, the future`s a class of feudal society is not more and more guarantee which will be like the present. Thus these a logical argument of Lu-Shi-Chun-Qiu still are dangerous for an emperor who is still in power, also it can see to provide a reason which disseise the power of an emperor. Therefore Qin-Shi-Huang flatly refused to accept it. Anyway an emperor who is still in power take a profound interest in that ``how can secure an emperor`s absolute authority in what kind of situation and condition``. Just the thing which meet the these demand is Dong-Zhong-Shu(董仲舒)`s theory of heaven(天論) and the theory on the formation of cosmos from the Original-Qi(元氣宇宙生成論) who the man of the moment of Han-Wudi(漢武帝).

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 張雙棣, "呂氏春秋譯注" 北京大學出版社 2000

2 陳奇猷, "呂氏春秋校釋 (上ㆍ下)" 學林出版社 1995

3 劉蔚華, "직하철학" 철학과 현실사 1995

4 박동인, "동중서 유술독존의 정치철학적 의미" 고려대학교 대학원 2010

5 앤그스 그레이엄, "도의 논쟁자들" 새물결 2001

6 吳光, "黃老之學通論" 浙江人民出版社 1985

7 陳鼓應, "黃帝四經今註今譯" 臺灣商務印書館 2001

8 張濤, "秦漢易學思想硏究" 中華書局 2005

9 張富祥, "王政全書: 『呂氏春秋』與中國文化" 河南大學出版社 2001

10 郭沫若, "十批判書" 東方出版社 1996

11 方立天, "中國古代哲學問題發展史" 中華書局 1990

12 呂愼剛, "『呂氏春秋』哲學思想探析" 山東大學敎 2006

13 "『회남자』 ｢原道訓｣ㆍ｢天文訓｣ㆍ｢精神訓｣ㆍ｢覽冥訓｣ㆍ｢本經訓｣｣"

14 "『사기』 ｢진시황본기｣ ; 『說苑』 ｢正諫｣; 『노자』; 『황제사경』 『十大經ㆍ觀｣"

15 박동인, "『관자』4편과 b>관자』의 氣化宇宙論" 철학연구회 86 (86): 33-59, 2009

16 劉愛敏, "『淮南子』道論探微" 山東大學敎 2006

17 김용수, "《淮南子》에 나타난 莊學思想" 한국도교문화학회 (20) : 133-178, 2004