RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재후보 SCOPUS

    The effects of store image components on consumers purchasing retailer brands in Korea

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103731873

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Although a huge number of academic researchers have paid considerable attention to exploring both the degree to which store image influences retailer brand customers and how to develop store personality, they have overlooked the contemporary retail context in which retailers have developed many different types of retailer brands, that is, price-oriented or quality-oriented retailer brands. Rather than focusing on the latter, much literature has looked at the former. Accordingly, even though there are many articles related to store image, a few authors have shown their interest in identifying the extent to which store personality affects customers purchasing retailer brands at lower prices. As a result, their efforts have been to illustrate the relationship between store image and consumer behaviours buying retailer brands.
    In that multiple retailers over the world such as E-Mart, Lotte-Mart, Tesco Korea and Tesco UK have actively introduced not only the quality-focused retailer brands that quality is better than, or equal to national brands, and prices are slightly higher than, or equal to them, but also price-focused retailer brands, academicians should make an effort to investigate how store image affects customers purchasing a quality-oriented retailer brand, comparing with previous research results. That is why the authors illustrate the extent to which store personality components influence retailer brand customers, including particularly quality-oriented retailer brand customers through an empirical research.
    By adopting a questionnaire method as a research technique to illuminate the relationship between store image components and retailer brand customers, research validity increases and further, data gathered through a field survey are analysed through a few statistic analysis methods, in order to minimise statistical deviations. Compared with the prior research concentrated on price-focused retailer brands, the authors have significantly shed light on customer behaviours purchasing retailer brand products with higher quality. When it comes to store personality components, the research suggests the following five items: merchandise attributes, services, physical facilities, promotions, and institutional image, considering the subcomponents mentioned by the previous research. Proposing the conceptual research model which those elements are differently hypothesised, according to retailer brand types: PR (Price-oriented Retailer brand) and QR (Quality-oriented Retailer brand), the research is proceeded.
    Through empirical research, the authors found that amongst the five items, only promotion influenced retailer brand customers in the Korean retailing marketplace, unlike other countries explored by many researchers, such as UK. Although much literature emphasises that those elements are closely related to retailer brand buying proneness, it is completely not fit to the Korean market. Also, research findings provide new insights into the degree of store image effects on retailer brand customers for academicians and practitioners. Whether the retailer brand development program that a retailer has carried simultaneously both price-focused and quality-focused retailer brand types is practically profitable should be explored in the future.
    번역하기

    Although a huge number of academic researchers have paid considerable attention to exploring both the degree to which store image influences retailer brand customers and how to develop store personality, they have overlooked the contemporary retail co...

    Although a huge number of academic researchers have paid considerable attention to exploring both the degree to which store image influences retailer brand customers and how to develop store personality, they have overlooked the contemporary retail context in which retailers have developed many different types of retailer brands, that is, price-oriented or quality-oriented retailer brands. Rather than focusing on the latter, much literature has looked at the former. Accordingly, even though there are many articles related to store image, a few authors have shown their interest in identifying the extent to which store personality affects customers purchasing retailer brands at lower prices. As a result, their efforts have been to illustrate the relationship between store image and consumer behaviours buying retailer brands.
    In that multiple retailers over the world such as E-Mart, Lotte-Mart, Tesco Korea and Tesco UK have actively introduced not only the quality-focused retailer brands that quality is better than, or equal to national brands, and prices are slightly higher than, or equal to them, but also price-focused retailer brands, academicians should make an effort to investigate how store image affects customers purchasing a quality-oriented retailer brand, comparing with previous research results. That is why the authors illustrate the extent to which store personality components influence retailer brand customers, including particularly quality-oriented retailer brand customers through an empirical research.
    By adopting a questionnaire method as a research technique to illuminate the relationship between store image components and retailer brand customers, research validity increases and further, data gathered through a field survey are analysed through a few statistic analysis methods, in order to minimise statistical deviations. Compared with the prior research concentrated on price-focused retailer brands, the authors have significantly shed light on customer behaviours purchasing retailer brand products with higher quality. When it comes to store personality components, the research suggests the following five items: merchandise attributes, services, physical facilities, promotions, and institutional image, considering the subcomponents mentioned by the previous research. Proposing the conceptual research model which those elements are differently hypothesised, according to retailer brand types: PR (Price-oriented Retailer brand) and QR (Quality-oriented Retailer brand), the research is proceeded.
    Through empirical research, the authors found that amongst the five items, only promotion influenced retailer brand customers in the Korean retailing marketplace, unlike other countries explored by many researchers, such as UK. Although much literature emphasises that those elements are closely related to retailer brand buying proneness, it is completely not fit to the Korean market. Also, research findings provide new insights into the degree of store image effects on retailer brand customers for academicians and practitioners. Whether the retailer brand development program that a retailer has carried simultaneously both price-focused and quality-focused retailer brand types is practically profitable should be explored in the future.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 Prendergast, G.P, "products: who buys them and how do they perform relative to each other?" 31 (31): 94-109, 1997

    2 The Telegraph, "http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/2225527/Tesco-drops-Zimbabwe-products.html"

    3 Cho Young-Sang, "Who has to take legal responsibility for retailer brand foods,manufacturers or retailers?" 한국유통과학회 9 (9): 97-109, 2011

    4 Hawes, J.M, "Using Psychographics to Identify the Generic Brand-Prone Grocery Shopper" 11 (11): 7-12, 1980

    5 Meenaghan,T, "The role of advertising in brand image development" 4 (4): 23-34, 1995

    6 ACNielsen, "The power of private label 2005" Executive News Report from ACNielsen Global Services 2005

    7 McEnally, M.R, "The market for generic brand grocery products: a review and extension" 48 (48): 75-83, 1984

    8 Richardson, P.S, "The influence of store aesthetics on evaluation of private label brands" 5 (5): 19-28, 1996

    9 Porter, S.S, "The influence of brand recognition on retail store image" 6 (6): 373-387, 1997

    10 Rha Hye-Su, "The effects of a manufacturer’s name on packaging on retailer brand attitudes and loyalty" 한국경영교육학회 26 (26): 51-72, 2011

    1 Prendergast, G.P, "products: who buys them and how do they perform relative to each other?" 31 (31): 94-109, 1997

    2 The Telegraph, "http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/africaandindianocean/zimbabwe/2225527/Tesco-drops-Zimbabwe-products.html"

    3 Cho Young-Sang, "Who has to take legal responsibility for retailer brand foods,manufacturers or retailers?" 한국유통과학회 9 (9): 97-109, 2011

    4 Hawes, J.M, "Using Psychographics to Identify the Generic Brand-Prone Grocery Shopper" 11 (11): 7-12, 1980

    5 Meenaghan,T, "The role of advertising in brand image development" 4 (4): 23-34, 1995

    6 ACNielsen, "The power of private label 2005" Executive News Report from ACNielsen Global Services 2005

    7 McEnally, M.R, "The market for generic brand grocery products: a review and extension" 48 (48): 75-83, 1984

    8 Richardson, P.S, "The influence of store aesthetics on evaluation of private label brands" 5 (5): 19-28, 1996

    9 Porter, S.S, "The influence of brand recognition on retail store image" 6 (6): 373-387, 1997

    10 Rha Hye-Su, "The effects of a manufacturer’s name on packaging on retailer brand attitudes and loyalty" 한국경영교육학회 26 (26): 51-72, 2011

    11 Murphy, P, "The effect of social class on brand and price consciousness for supermarket products" 54 (54): 33-42, 1978

    12 Cagley, J.W., "The Wheel of Retailing Squeaks but Turns: Generic Labelling in Supermarkets, Marketing in the 80s Changes and Challenges" American Marketing Association 184-187, 1980

    13 James, D.L, "The Use of a Multi-Attribute Attitude Model in a Store Image Study" 52 (52): 23-32, 1976

    14 Martineau,P, "The Personality of the Retail Store" 36 : 47-55, 1958

    15 Grewal, D., "The Moderating Effects of Message Framing and Source Credibility on the Price-Perceived Risk Relationship" 21 (21): 145-153, 1994

    16 Steenkamp, J-B.E.M, "The Increasing Power of Store Brands: Building Loyalty and Market Share" 30 (30): 917-930, 1997

    17 Rich, S.U, "The Imageries of Department Stores" 28 (28): 10-15, 1964

    18 Collins-dodd, C, "Store brands and retail differentiation:the influence of store inage and store brand attitude on store own brand perceptions" 10 (10): 345-352, 2003

    19 Atsumi,S, "Store Layout" Jitsumukyoikushuppan 1992

    20 Private Label Manufacturers’ Association, "Store Brand Today"

    21 Donovan, R.J, "Store Atmosphere and Purchasing Behavior" 70 (70): 283-294, 1994

    22 Myers, R.H, "Sharpening Your Store Image" 36 (36): 129-137, 1960

    23 Mitchell, V.W, "Risk perception and reduction in the purchase of consumer services" 13 (13): 179-200, 1993

    24 Levy, M, "Retailing Management, 5th ed" McGraw-Hill Irwin 2004

    25 Browns,S, "Retailers and micro-retail location: a perceptual perspective" 2 (2): 3-21, 1987

    26 Cho,Y.S, "Retailer brand development and handling processes:A comparative study of Tesco Korea and Local Korean retailers" 2009

    27 McGoldrick,P, "Retail Marketing, 2nd ed" McGraw-Hill 2002

    28 Bettman,J.R, "Relationship of information-processing attitude structures to private brand purchasing behaviour" 59 (59): 79-83, 1974

    29 Ailawadi, K. L, "Pursuing the value conscious consumer: Private labels versus national brand promotions" 65 (65): 71-89, 2001

    30 Jonas, A, "Private labels for premium products–the example of organic food" 33 (33): 636-653, 2005

    31 Vahie, A, "Private label brand image: its relationship with store image and national brand" 34 (34): 67-84, 2006

    32 Nandan, S, "Private brands: major brand perspective" 11 (11): 8-28, 1994

    33 Manez, J.A, "Price differentials among brands in retail distribution: product quality and service quality" 1-25, 2011

    34 Martell,D, "Own labels: problem child or infant prodigy?" 11 (11): 7-12, 1986

    35 Lindquist,J.D, "Meaning of Image" 50 (50): 29-116, 1974

    36 King, C.W, "Market Positioning Across Retail Fashion Institutions: A Comparative Analysis of Store Types" 56 (56): 37-55, 1980

    37 Jacoby, J, "Linking brand and retailer images: Do the potential risk outweigh the potential benefits?" 60 (60): 105-122, 1984

    38 Szymanski, D.M, "Identifying the Generic-Prone Consumer: A Meta-Analysis" 24 (24): 425-431, 1987

    39 Doyle, P, "How store Image Affects Shopping Habits in Grocery Chain" 50 (50): 39-52, 1974

    40 Dick, A., "How consumers evaluate store brands" 5 (5): 18-24, 1996

    41 Cardozo,R.N, "How Image Vary by Product Class" 50 (50): 85-98, 1974

    42 Omar, O.E, "Grocery Purchase Behaviour for National and Own-label Brands" 16 (16): 58-66, 1996

    43 Murphy, P, "Generic Supermarket Items: A Product and Consumer Analysis" 55 (55): 3-14, 1979

    44 Cunningham, I.C, "Generic Brands Versus National Brands and Store brands" 22 (22): 25-32, 1982

    45 Livesey F, "Factors Affecting Consumers’Choice Between Manufacturer Brands and Retailer Own Brands" 12 (12): 158-170, 1978

    46 Richardson, P.S, "Extrinsic and intrinsic cue effects on perceptions of store brand quality" 58 (58): 36-38, 1994

    47 Mazursky, D, "Exploring the Development of Store Image" 62 (62): 145-165, 1986

    48 Fomell. C, "Evaluating Structural Equation Models With Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error" 18 (18): 39-50, 1981

    49 Dubinsky, A. J, "Ethics in Retailing –Perceptions of Retail Salespeople" 13 (13): 1-15, 1985

    50 Arons,L, "Does Television Viewing Influence Store Image and Shopping Frequency?" 37 : 1-13, 1961

    51 Wills,R.L, "Do advertising-induced price differences among brands explain profit differences among products? In Issues after a Century of federal Competition Policy" Lexington Books, Health, Lexington Mass 1987

    52 Dick, A, "Correlates of store brand proneness: some empirical observations" 4 (4): 15-22, 1995

    53 Martenson,R, "Corporate brand image, satisfaction and store loyalty" 35 (35): 544-555, 2007

    54 Mitchell, V.W, "Consumers’ risk reduction strategies: a review and synthesis" 6 (6): 1-33, 1996

    55 Semeijn, J, "Consumer evaluations of store brands: effect of store image and product attributes" 11 (11): 247-258, 2004

    56 Baltas, G, "Consumer characteristics and demand for store brands" 35 (35): 328-341, 2007

    57 Strang, R.A, "Consumer Trial of Generic Products in Supermarkets: An exploratory Study" American Marketing Association 386-388, 1979

    58 Bellizzi, J.A, "Consumer Perceptions of National, private, and Generic Brands" 57 (57): 56-70, 1981

    59 Engel, J.F, "Consumer Behaviour" Dryden Press 1982

    60 Mattila,A.S, "Congruency of scent and music as a driver of in-store evaluations and behavior" 77 (77): 273-290, 2001

    61 McDougall, G.H.G, "Combining Two Methods of Image Measurement" 50 (50): 53-61, 1974

    62 Corstjens, M, "Building Store Loyalty Through Store Brands" 37 (37): 281-291, 2000

    63 Cunningham,R.M, "Brand loyalty and Store Loyalty Interrelationships" 210-214, 1959

    64 Turley, L.W, "Atmospheric effects on shopping behavior: A review of the experimental evidence" 49 : 193-211, 2000

    65 Babin, B. J, "Atmospheric Affect as a Tool for Creating Value and Gaining share of Customer" 49 (49): 91-99, 2000

    66 Aggarwal, P, "Asymmetric price competition and store vs national brand choice" 7 (7): 244-253, 1998

    67 Frank, R.E, "Are private-brand-prone grocery customers really different?" 5 (5): 27-35, 1965

    68 Rao, T, "Are Some consumers More Prone to Purchase Private Brands?" 6 (6): 447-450, 1969

    69 Herstein, R, "An investigation of the new generic consumer" 24 (24): 133-141, 2007

    70 Kaiser,H.F, "An index of factorial simplicity" 39 : 31-36, 1974

    71 Granzin,K.L, "An Investigation of the Market for Generic Products" 57 (57): 39-55, 1981

    72 Granzin, K.L, "An Empirical Investigation into the Characteristics of the Market for Generic Products" Southwest Marketing Association 85-86, 1980

    73 Holbrook, M. b, "An Approach to Investigating the Emotional Determinants of Consumption Durations: Why Do People Consume What They Consume for as Long as They Consume It?" 2 (2): 123-42, 1993

    74 Hass-Klau, C, "Accessibility,Walking, Linked Trips" 1999

    75 Anvik, L, "A profile of Intentions Groups for Generic Branded Grocery Products, in Development in Marketing Science, 2" Academy of Marketing Science 1-4, 1979

    76 Kurose, S, "A method of identifying accessibility properties of pedestrian shopping networks" 2 (2): 111-118, 1995

    77 Sethuraman, R, "A meta-analysis of national brand and store brand cross-promotional price elasticises" 6 (6): 275-286, 1995

    78 Lord, J.D, "A market-area approach to determining optimum store size" 9 (9): 339-348, 1999

    79 Baltas,G, "A combined segmentation and demand model for store brands" 37 (37): 1499-1513, 2003

    80 Clarke, I, "A case for spatial decision-support systems in retail location planning" 23 (23): 4-10, 1995

    81 Kunkel, J.H, "A Behavioural Conception of Retail Image" 32 (32): 21-27, 1968

    더보기

    동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

    동일학술지 더보기

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2023 평가 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
    2020-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
    2013-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2012-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2010-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    2005-01-24 학회명변경 영문명 : Korean Academy Of Distribution Science -> Korea Distribution Science Association
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.72 0.72 0.69
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.7 0.72 0.762 0.31
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼