수리 문제와 개념 문제 사이의 유도 효과 = Inductive Influence of Algorithmic and Conceptual Problems

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

This study investigated whether algorithmic problem solving and conceptual problem solving influenced each other or not. Four classes of 12th grade (N=112) that are equal in prior achievement were randomly assigned to group AC (Algorithmic-Conceptual problem) and group CA (Conceptual-Algorithmic problem). Students of group AC solved the conceptual problems after learning the related algorithmic problems, and those of group CA solved the same problems in reverse order. The results revealed that learning the algorithmic problems improved students` ability to solve the related conceptual problems, but learning the conceptual problems did not help students solve the related algorithmic problems. Regarding the confidence on problem solving, learning the algorithmic problems had little effect on the related conceptual problems. Learning the conceptual problems also had little effect on students` confidence on solving of the related algorithmic problems.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 "통계학의 이해" 학지사 2003

2 "Using algorithms to teach problem solving" 64 (64): 518-519, 1987

3 "Two aspects of meaningful problem solving in science" 731-741, 1982

4 "The solving of problems in chemistry: The more open-ended problems" 20 (20): 83-98, 2002

5 "The Cognitive Psychology of School Learning" Harper Collins College Publishers 1993

6 "Success on algorithmic and LOCS vs. conceptual chemistry exam questions" 72 (72): 987-989, 1995

7 "Students do not overcome conceptual difficulties after solving 1000 traditional problems" 70 (70): 759-765, 2002

8 "Rethinking university teaching:A framework for the effective use of educational technology" Routledge 1993

9 "Progressive transitions from algorithmic to conceptual understanding in student ability to solve chemistry problems: A Lakatosian interpretation" 79 (79): 19-36, 1995

10 "Procedural and conceptual knowledge of expert and novice students for the solving of a basic problem in chemistry" 21 (21): 195-211, 1999

11 "Problem solving in physics A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (70th, Oak Brook, IL, March 21-24)" 1997

12 "Narrowing the gap between concepts and algorithms in freshman chemistry" 73 (73): 758-762, 1996

13 "Learning and Memory: An Integrated Approach" John Wiley & Sons 1995

14 "Is there a difference? Journal of Chemical Education" 508-510, 1987

15 "Introductory students, conceptual understanding, and algorithmic success." 75 (75): 809-810, 1998

16 "Introductory college chemistry students' understanding of stoichiometry Connections between conceptual and computational understandings and instruction" Oregon State University. 2000

17 "International Perspectives on Psychological Science The state of the art" Larence Erlbaum Associates 341-357, 1994

18 "Instructional influence of a molecular-level pictorial presentation of matter on students' conceptions and problem-solving ability" 34 (34): 199-217, 1997

19 "Inductive influence of related quantitative and conceptual problems A paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (New Orleans, LA, April 6-10)" 2002

20 "Concepts and calculations in chemistry teaching and learning Journal of Chemical Education" 111-112, 1994

21 "Are our students conceptual thinkers or algorithmic problem solvers? Journal of Chemical Education" 52-55, 1993

22 "Algorithmic problem solving and conceptual understanding of chemistry by students at a local high school in Taiwan" 11 (11): 20-38, 2001