RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      인문대를 해체하면 되는 걸까: 교양인문학 또는 인문학 융합교육의 가능성과 의미 = The Possibility and the Meaning of the Liberal Arts Education and the Convergence of Humanities and Other Majors in General Education

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103563190

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The purpose of this paper is to work out the practical solutions for the survival and/or the development of the humanities focusing on two alternatives: the transformation of the humanities majors into the liberal arts education and the convergence of the humanities and other majors in general education. The crisis of the humanities is not a new issue at all and many arguments have been made of this topic. The request for the CORE project, released in Dec 2015 which was supposedly to aim to promote the scholarship of the humanities, ironically, seemed to stifle the humanities in that it drove the college of humanities to be disbanded in many universities. It triggered a fervent discussion of the paths for humanities to take for its survival and/or development. Two alternatives emerged: one is the disbandment of the college of humanities and tying the humanities to the liberal arts education and the other is the convergence of the humanities with other majors as a part of general education. However, both of them have lots of challenges to be met. The history of the convergence education in Korean universities for the last decade shows that the convergence issue started from an economic interest with the ministry of education taking the lead. To meet the requirements of a series of national projects requested by the ministry of education, new school regulations have been framed with academic systems reorganized and the general education has become a main site for the convergence education. The disbandment of the college of humanities and reorganization of the curriculum of the general education centering on liberal arts is not an easy option either, for the general education has developed its own agenda independent of the humanities and the administrators in the headquarters of the university want to get a palpable output immediately which is hard to expect of the liberal arts education. This paper argues that the viable alternative is to extend the contact line on which the humanities and other majors meet and communicate together. Firstly, the practitioners of the humanities are to develop the liberal arts education which meets the needs of the masses. Secondly, it is needed to build up new humanities in line with digital culture in which the undergraduate students are immersed in. Thirdly, the humanities need to extend their interests to other majors and converge with them crossing the borderline of each discipline.
      번역하기

      The purpose of this paper is to work out the practical solutions for the survival and/or the development of the humanities focusing on two alternatives: the transformation of the humanities majors into the liberal arts education and the convergence of...

      The purpose of this paper is to work out the practical solutions for the survival and/or the development of the humanities focusing on two alternatives: the transformation of the humanities majors into the liberal arts education and the convergence of the humanities and other majors in general education. The crisis of the humanities is not a new issue at all and many arguments have been made of this topic. The request for the CORE project, released in Dec 2015 which was supposedly to aim to promote the scholarship of the humanities, ironically, seemed to stifle the humanities in that it drove the college of humanities to be disbanded in many universities. It triggered a fervent discussion of the paths for humanities to take for its survival and/or development. Two alternatives emerged: one is the disbandment of the college of humanities and tying the humanities to the liberal arts education and the other is the convergence of the humanities with other majors as a part of general education. However, both of them have lots of challenges to be met. The history of the convergence education in Korean universities for the last decade shows that the convergence issue started from an economic interest with the ministry of education taking the lead. To meet the requirements of a series of national projects requested by the ministry of education, new school regulations have been framed with academic systems reorganized and the general education has become a main site for the convergence education. The disbandment of the college of humanities and reorganization of the curriculum of the general education centering on liberal arts is not an easy option either, for the general education has developed its own agenda independent of the humanities and the administrators in the headquarters of the university want to get a palpable output immediately which is hard to expect of the liberal arts education. This paper argues that the viable alternative is to extend the contact line on which the humanities and other majors meet and communicate together. Firstly, the practitioners of the humanities are to develop the liberal arts education which meets the needs of the masses. Secondly, it is needed to build up new humanities in line with digital culture in which the undergraduate students are immersed in. Thirdly, the humanities need to extend their interests to other majors and converge with them crossing the borderline of each discipline.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 홍효정, "창의·융합적 사고역량 강화를 위한 교양교육과정 개발 방향 탐색" 한국교양교육학회 9 (9): 163-192, 2015

      2 이희용, "지식융합 교육을 위한 교과목 개발" 한국교양교육학회 5 (5): 11-37, 2011

      3 커트 스펠마이어, "즐거운 인문학: 21세기 인문학의 재창조를 위하여" Human & Books 2008

      4 천정환, "인문학 열풍에 관한 성찰과 제언: 시민인문학 강좌를 중심으로" 영미문학연구회 (38) : 100-127, 2015

      5 송승철, "인문대를 해체하라!: '전공인문학'에서 '교양인문학'으로" 영미문학연구회 (34) : 148-176, 2013

      6 김혜영, "융합교육의 체계화를 위한 융합교육의 방향과 기초융합교과 설계에 대한 제언" 한국교양교육학회 7 (7): 11-38, 2013

      7 손동현, "융복합교육의 기초와 학부대학의 역할" 3 (3): 21-32, 2009

      8 이현청, "왜 대학은 사라지는가" 카모마일북스 2015

      9 신정근, "싸우는 인문학: 한국 인문학의 최전선" 반비 50-59, 2013

      10 전인한, "시력 약한 박쥐의 아름다운 퇴장: 새로운 인문학의 출현을 고대하며" 영미문학연구회 (39) : 120-148, 2015

      1 홍효정, "창의·융합적 사고역량 강화를 위한 교양교육과정 개발 방향 탐색" 한국교양교육학회 9 (9): 163-192, 2015

      2 이희용, "지식융합 교육을 위한 교과목 개발" 한국교양교육학회 5 (5): 11-37, 2011

      3 커트 스펠마이어, "즐거운 인문학: 21세기 인문학의 재창조를 위하여" Human & Books 2008

      4 천정환, "인문학 열풍에 관한 성찰과 제언: 시민인문학 강좌를 중심으로" 영미문학연구회 (38) : 100-127, 2015

      5 송승철, "인문대를 해체하라!: '전공인문학'에서 '교양인문학'으로" 영미문학연구회 (34) : 148-176, 2013

      6 김혜영, "융합교육의 체계화를 위한 융합교육의 방향과 기초융합교과 설계에 대한 제언" 한국교양교육학회 7 (7): 11-38, 2013

      7 손동현, "융복합교육의 기초와 학부대학의 역할" 3 (3): 21-32, 2009

      8 이현청, "왜 대학은 사라지는가" 카모마일북스 2015

      9 신정근, "싸우는 인문학: 한국 인문학의 최전선" 반비 50-59, 2013

      10 전인한, "시력 약한 박쥐의 아름다운 퇴장: 새로운 인문학의 출현을 고대하며" 영미문학연구회 (39) : 120-148, 2015

      11 홍성욱, "성공하는 융합, 실패하는 융합」, 김광웅 엮음 『융합학문 어디로 가고 있나" 서울대학교출판문화원 2011

      12 서덕희, "사회과학과 예술융합교육의 필요성과 가능성”, 「대학융합교육의 새로운 흐름: 진단과 전망" 9-21, 2015

      13 교육부, "대학인문역량강화사업 설명회 자료"

      14 윤지관, "구조조정 속의 인문학과 대학: 무엇을 할 것인가" 영미문학연구회 (39) : 96-119, 2015

      15 이성흠, "강좌별 수업형태 및 융복합 교육을 위한 수업지원방책연구(II)" 교양기초교육원 2013

      16 "The Next Insanely Great Thing"

      17 Steve Jobs, "Stanford Address"

      18 "Harvard College Handbook for Students (2015-2016)"

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 신청제한 (등재후보2차)
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 FAIL (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.64 0.64 0.63
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.52 0.45 1.421 0.15
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼