중학생의 자기주도학습력검사(SDLAT) 개발 및 타당화 = Development and Validation of Self-directed Learning Ability Test(SDLAT) for Middle School Students

국문 초록 (Abstract)

본 연구는 Lee, Park과 Kim(2017)이 개발하여 타당화한 대학생용 자기주도학습력검사(SDLAT)를 바탕으로 중학생용 자기주도학습력검사 문항을 개발한 후. 예비조사와 본 조사를 거쳐 검사의 타당화 작업을 실시하였다. 본 연구에서 개발된 중학생 자기주도학습력검사는 인지, 정의, 행동의 세 영역으로 구분되고, 각 영역별로 세 개의 하위요인이 포함되었다. 인지적 영역에는 ‘인지적 사고, 초인지, 문제해결력’을, 정의적 영역에는 ‘내재적 동기, 미래지향적 동기, 자기효능감’을, 행동적 영역에는 ‘도움구하기, 물리적 환경관리, 시간관리’를 하위요인으로 구성하였다. 세 개 영역의 총 아홉 개의 하위요인의 위계구조를 확인하기 위하여 첫째, 요인 간 상관관계를 분석하였으며 둘째, 탐색적 요인분석을 실시하고, 셋째, 확인적 요인분석을 실시하였다. 요인 간에는 적절한 상관이 확인되었다(.463～.783). 그리고 탐색적 요인분석을 통해 총 9개의 하위요인과 58개 문항이 확정되었으며, 확인적 요인분석을 통해 전체 위계모형(3개 영역, 9개 하위요인)의 적합도가 확인되었다. NFI, IFI, CFI 등의 적합도 지수는 모두 .80 이상을 나타냈으며, RMSEA도 .045로 전체적인 모형의 적합도는 양호하였다. 각 문항들의 표준화 회귀계수 또한 .53～.85로 양호하게 나타났다. 또한 본 도구의 전체 문항의 신뢰도는 Cronbach α .971로 신뢰도는 확보되었다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The purpose of this study was to develop the self-directed learning ability test for middle school students based on the self-directed learning ability test(SDLAT) that developed and validated by Lee, Park and Kim(2017). Statistical validation was carried out after the data were collected through preliminary and main surveys. The SDLAT for middle school students developed in this study was divided into three domains: cognition, affection, and behavior. And three sub-factors were included in each domain. The sub-factors of the cognitive domain were cognitive thinking, meta-cognition and problem solving ability, and affective domain includes the intrinsic motivation, future oriented motivation, and self-efficacy. And seeking help, physical environment management, time management were sub-factors of the behavior domain. To identify the hierarchical structure of a total of nine sub-factors in the three domains, the correlations between the factors were analyzed, exploratory factor analysis was performed, and confirmatory factor analysis was performed. In the results of this study, an appropriate correlation between the factors was confirmed (.463~.783). Through the exploratory factor analysis, 9 sub-factors and 58 items were confirmed. Through confirmatory factor analysis, the fit of the whole hierarchical model (3 domains, 9 sub-factors) was confirmed. The fit scores of NFI, IFI, and CFI were all above .80, and RMSEA was .045. The overall fit of the model was good. The standardized regression coefficient for each item was also good at .53~.85. In addition, the reliability of the SDLAT was Cronbach α .971.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• Ⅰ. 서 론
• Ⅱ. 연구 방법
• Ⅲ. 연구결과
• Ⅳ. 논의 및 결론