RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색

인기 검색어

    다국어 입력

    http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

    변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

    예시)
    • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
    • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
    닫기
    KCI등재

    BSC 기법을 이용한 보건소 성과평가지표 - K시보건소 건강증진팀을 대상으로 = Development of Organizational Performance Evaluation Indicators of A Public Health Center Using Balanced Scorecard Approach - Health Promotion Team of K City Public Health Center

    한글로보기

    https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104442371

    • 0

      상세조회
    • 0

      다운로드
    서지정보 열기
    • 내보내기
    • 내책장담기
    • 공유하기
    • 오류접수

    부가정보

    다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

    Researchers indicates several issues as to performance evaluation methods for public health centers. Firstly, health centers are passively involved in the evaluation process, the performance indicators are activity-oriented, and mostly unrealistic. Balanced Scorecard is one of the methods for evaluating organizational performance, which is utilized at current in many industries including public sector. The purposes of this study is to apply balanced scorecard approach to a public health center and to develop performance indicators as well as their vision and strategies.
    For developing performance indicators, researchers selected K City Public Health Center and implemented brainstorming with members of health promotion team. Through team process they suggested goals, strategies and several indicators they considered proper to accomplish their shared vision. And then appropriateness of the indicators were evaluated by professional researchers in health promotion field for consensus building by email questionnaire.
    Based on survey and professional consensus meeting, 11 performance indicators were tailored in four perspectives as well as 6 strategies and 10 strategic goals, which are steps for accomplishing shared vision of health promotion team. For details, refer to the paper.
    Most members of health promotion team were satisfied with the indicators. However issues such as low level of recognition and familiarity with a new concept of BSC, and cultural resistance to strategic approach in public organizations should be addressed for future application and dissemination of BSC technique to public health organizations.
    번역하기

    Researchers indicates several issues as to performance evaluation methods for public health centers. Firstly, health centers are passively involved in the evaluation process, the performance indicators are activity-oriented, and mostly unrealistic. Ba...

    Researchers indicates several issues as to performance evaluation methods for public health centers. Firstly, health centers are passively involved in the evaluation process, the performance indicators are activity-oriented, and mostly unrealistic. Balanced Scorecard is one of the methods for evaluating organizational performance, which is utilized at current in many industries including public sector. The purposes of this study is to apply balanced scorecard approach to a public health center and to develop performance indicators as well as their vision and strategies.
    For developing performance indicators, researchers selected K City Public Health Center and implemented brainstorming with members of health promotion team. Through team process they suggested goals, strategies and several indicators they considered proper to accomplish their shared vision. And then appropriateness of the indicators were evaluated by professional researchers in health promotion field for consensus building by email questionnaire.
    Based on survey and professional consensus meeting, 11 performance indicators were tailored in four perspectives as well as 6 strategies and 10 strategic goals, which are steps for accomplishing shared vision of health promotion team. For details, refer to the paper.
    Most members of health promotion team were satisfied with the indicators. However issues such as low level of recognition and familiarity with a new concept of BSC, and cultural resistance to strategic approach in public organizations should be addressed for future application and dissemination of BSC technique to public health organizations.

    더보기

    참고문헌 (Reference)

    1 "지역보건의료계획 평가" 1999

    2 "지역보건의료계획 수립 및 평가를 위한 모형개발" 한국보건사회연구원 1997

    3 "지역보건법 1995, 제3조" 1995.12.

    4 "제3기 지역보건의료계획 현지평가지침" 보건복지부 2005

    5 "제2기 지역보건의료계획 및 시행결과 평가 연구" 한국보건산업진흥원 2002.4

    6 "우정사업본부 통합경영관리시스템 BSC 선결과제 최종보고서" 2002

    7 "가치실현을 위한 통합경영지표BSC"

    8 "The Blanced Scorecard-measures that drive performance" jan-feb : 75-85, 1992

    9 "The Balanced Scorecard:a strategic management system for multi-sector collaboration and strategy implementation" 8 (8): 21-39, 2000

    10 "The Balanced Scorecard:Development and Implementation in an Academic Clinical Department" 74 : 114-122, 1999

    1 "지역보건의료계획 평가" 1999

    2 "지역보건의료계획 수립 및 평가를 위한 모형개발" 한국보건사회연구원 1997

    3 "지역보건법 1995, 제3조" 1995.12.

    4 "제3기 지역보건의료계획 현지평가지침" 보건복지부 2005

    5 "제2기 지역보건의료계획 및 시행결과 평가 연구" 한국보건산업진흥원 2002.4

    6 "우정사업본부 통합경영관리시스템 BSC 선결과제 최종보고서" 2002

    7 "가치실현을 위한 통합경영지표BSC"

    8 "The Blanced Scorecard-measures that drive performance" jan-feb : 75-85, 1992

    9 "The Balanced Scorecard:a strategic management system for multi-sector collaboration and strategy implementation" 8 (8): 21-39, 2000

    10 "The Balanced Scorecard:Development and Implementation in an Academic Clinical Department" 74 : 114-122, 1999

    11 "The Balanced Scorecard:A Potent Tool for Energizing and Focusing Healthcare Organization Management" 43 (43): 263-280, 1998

    12 "S병원 성과평가지표 개발에 관한 연구" 5 (5): 1-23, 2000

    13 "Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving" 1957

    14 "Perception of performance in group brainstorming:the illusion of group productivity" 19 : 78-79, 1993

    15 "Measuring comparative hospital performance" 47 (47): 41-57, 2002

    16 "Issues for Academic Health Centers to Consider before Implementing a Balanced-scorecard Effort" 74 : 1269-1277, 1999

    17 "How to link compensation and rewards to the BSC" 1998

    18 "Group performance and decision making" 55 : 623-655, 2004

    19 "Global BSC trends-2003 Global BSC survey results" 2003

    20 "Determination and quantification of content validity" 35 (35): 382-385, 1986

    21 "Balanced Scorecard 기법을 활용한 국민건강보험공단의 조직성과 평가지표 개발: 지사 수준" 대한예방의학회 -30, 2004

    22 "BSC실천 매뉴얼" 2001

    23 "BSC를 활용한 병원경영혁신" 271 : 76-86, 2001

    24 "BSC구축 &실행사례" 1999

    25 "21세기 보건소를 위한 보건소 업무 표준화 및 교육훈련 프로그램 개발 기초연구" 1998

    더보기

    분석정보

    View

    상세정보조회

    0

    Usage

    원문다운로드

    0

    대출신청

    0

    복사신청

    0

    EDDS신청

    0

    동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

    더보기

    주제

    연도별 연구동향

    연도별 활용동향

    연관논문

    연구자 네트워크맵

    공동연구자 (7)

    유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

    인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

    학술지 이력

    학술지 이력
    연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
    2027 평가 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
    2021-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
    2018-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2015-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2013-03-11 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Society Of Health Policy And Administration -> Korean Academy of Health Policy and Management KCI등재
    2013-03-11 학술지명변경 외국어명 : Korean Journal of Health Policy and Administration -> Health Policy and Mangemnet KCI등재
    2011-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2009-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2007-01-01 등재 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
    2004-01-01 등재 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
    2003-01-01 등재 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    2002-01-01 등재 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
    1999-07-01 등재 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
    더보기

    학술지 인용정보

    학술지 인용정보
    기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
    2016 0.78 0.78 0.8
    KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
    0.81 0.78 1.372 0.12
    더보기

    이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

    나만을 위한 추천자료

    해외이동버튼