국립중앙도서관 "우편 복사 서비스"로 연결 됩니다.
This study aims to improve the global competitiveness of Busan Port in line with the changes in the port logistics system of advanced overseas ports that are rapidly changing due to the 4th Industrial Revolution. The exercise of port-related authority...
다국어 입력
あ
ぁ
か
が
さ
ざ
た
だ
な
は
ば
ぱ
ま
や
ゃ
ら
わ
ゎ
ん
い
ぃ
き
ぎ
し
じ
ち
ぢ
に
ひ
び
ぴ
み
り
う
ぅ
く
ぐ
す
ず
つ
づ
っ
ぬ
ふ
ぶ
ぷ
む
ゆ
ゅ
る
え
ぇ
け
げ
せ
ぜ
て
で
ね
へ
べ
ぺ
め
れ
お
ぉ
こ
ご
そ
ぞ
と
ど
の
ほ
ぼ
ぽ
も
よ
ょ
ろ
を
ア
ァ
カ
サ
ザ
タ
ダ
ナ
ハ
バ
パ
マ
ヤ
ャ
ラ
ワ
ヮ
ン
イ
ィ
キ
ギ
シ
ジ
チ
ヂ
ニ
ヒ
ビ
ピ
ミ
リ
ウ
ゥ
ク
グ
ス
ズ
ツ
ヅ
ッ
ヌ
フ
ブ
プ
ム
ユ
ュ
ル
エ
ェ
ケ
ゲ
セ
ゼ
テ
デ
ヘ
ベ
ペ
メ
レ
オ
ォ
コ
ゴ
ソ
ゾ
ト
ド
ノ
ホ
ボ
ポ
モ
ヨ
ョ
ロ
ヲ
―
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
예시)
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
А
Б
В
Г
Д
Е
Ё
Ж
З
И
Й
К
Л
М
Н
О
П
Р
С
Т
У
Ф
Х
Ц
Ч
Ш
Щ
Ъ
Ы
Ь
Э
Ю
Я
а
б
в
г
д
е
ё
ж
з
и
й
к
л
м
н
о
п
р
с
т
у
ф
х
ц
ч
ш
щ
ъ
ы
ь
э
ю
я
′
″
℃
Å
￠
￡
￥
¤
℉
‰
＄
％
Ｆ
￦
㎕
㎖
㎗
ℓ
㎘
㏄
㎣
㎤
㎥
㎦
㎙
㎚
㎛
㎜
㎝
㎞
㎟
㎠
㎡
㎢
㏊
㎍
㎎
㎏
㏏
㎈
㎉
㏈
㎧
㎨
㎰
㎱
㎲
㎳
㎴
㎵
㎶
㎷
㎸
㎹
㎀
㎁
㎂
㎃
㎄
㎺
㎻
㎽
㎾
㎿
㎐
㎑
㎒
㎓
㎔
Ω
㏀
㏁
㎊
㎋
㎌
㏖
㏅
㎭
㎮
㎯
㏛
㎩
㎪
㎫
㎬
㏝
㏐
㏓
㏃
㏉
㏜
㏆
RISS 인기검색어
항만 관련 권한의 합리적 배분방안에 관한 연구 : 부산항을 중심으로 = A study on rational distribution of port-related authority - Focusing on Busan Port -
한글로보기https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16668630
- 저자
-
발행사항
부산 : 한국해양대학교 대학원, 2023
-
학위논문사항
학위논문(박사) -- 한국해양대학교 대학원 , 통상행정학과 행정학 , 2023. 2
-
발행연도
2023
-
작성언어
한국어
- 주제어
-
발행국(도시)
부산
-
형태사항
146 ; 26 cm
-
일반주기명
지도교수: 김상구
-
UCI식별코드
I804:21028-200000665594
-
소장기관
- 국립한국해양대학교 도서관
- 국립한국해양대학교 도서관
-
0
상세조회 -
0
다운로드
부가정보
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study aims to improve the global competitiveness of Busan Port in line with the changes in the port logistics system of advanced overseas ports that are rapidly changing due to the 4th Industrial Revolution. The exercise of port-related authority between the central government, local governments, and port authorities in port development and management, raises the question of whether it is true that the central government exercises the authority for port development and management entirely, as well as raising the economic status of Busan Port. In order to improve the Busan Metropolitan City or the Busan Port Authority, the central government's port-related affairs started with a critical mind of how much port autonomy should be secured to enhance the global competitiveness of Busan Port.
The distribution of authority, such as port development and management, concentrated in the central government to local governments or port authorities is presented through a literature review and a survey of port-related experts, and the central government's position on port-related authority, The position of the local government and the position of the port authority are analyzed through previous studies, and how the authority of the central government, the authority of the local government, and the authority of the port authority are established in the 「Port Act」. This study tried to examine the provisions of the so-called 3 Port Acts, such as the 「Port Redevelopment and Adjacent Area Development Act」 and the 「Marina Port Creation and Management Act」.
Under the current 「Port Act」, nationally managed ports such as Busan Port have been operated so far in terms of uniformity, publicity, and efficiency of ports because the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries has port-related authority such as the establishment of basic port plans. Over the years, the capacity of each local government has been strengthened more than in the past, and since the demand of local residents for decentralization is greater than ever, the central government has been Rather, local governments should exercise port-related authority on their own initiative to solve the problem of compatibility with urban planning. In addition, the role of port authorities within the jurisdiction is gradually increasing for the strengthening of port competitiveness, the autonomy of port operation, and professionalism of the port operation.
This study has organized the rational distribution of port-related rights into five major categories. First, the establishment of a basic port plan under the 「Port Act」 and the distribution of enforcement rights, second, the distribution of port management and operation rights under the 「Port Act」 Third, the distribution plan of port hinterland development plan and execution authority under 「Port Act」, fourth, establishment and implementation authority of basic port redevelopment plan under 「Port Redevelopment Act」, fifth, establishment and implementation of a basic plan under 「Marina Port Act」 Regarding the distribution method of authority, the distribution method were proposed along with the need for revision of related laws and systems.
According to the 「Port Act」 through a survey of experts, ‘allocation of authority to establish and implement basic plans for ports’ requires distribution of authority to local governments with an emphasis on connectivity with regions and locality of ports rather than maintaining the existing authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. For the competitiveness of ports, it is necessary to distribute authority to port authorities. According to the 「Port Act」, the distribution of the ‘right to manage and operate the port’ is not to maintain the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of port unity and port efficiency, but rather to distribute the authority to local governments in terms of connectivity with the region and locality of ports. This is necessary, and in terms of autonomy in port operation, it is necessary to distribute authority to port authorities.
In addition, the distribution of the ‘port hinterland development planning authority ’ under the 「Port Act」 is not about maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of unity, publicity, and efficiency of ports, but in terms of connectivity with the region, vitalization of the local economy, and locality of ports It is necessary to distribute powers to local governments
The distribution of the ‘authority to establish and implement basic plans for port redevelopment’ under the 「Port Redevelopment Act」 is based on the connection with the region rather than maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of the unity of ports, the publicity of ports, and the efficiency of resource distribution. It is necessary to distribute authority to local governments with an emphasis on economic revitalization and port locality.
Lastly, the distribution of the ‘marina port master plan establishment and implementation authority’ under the 「Marina Port Act」 is related to the region rather than maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of port uniformity, publicity of ports, and resource allocation efficiency. It is necessary to distribute authority to local governments with an emphasis on revitalizing the local economy and locality of ports.
Keywords: Port Autonomy, Port 3 Act, port authority, Port Development, Port Redevelopment, Marina Port
The distribution of authority, such as port development and management, concentrated in the central government to local governments or port authorities is presented through a literature review and a survey of port-related experts, and the central government's position on port-related authority, The position of the local government and the position of the port authority are analyzed through previous studies, and how the authority of the central government, the authority of the local government, and the authority of the port authority are established in the 「Port Act」. This study tried to examine the provisions of the so-called 3 Port Acts, such as the 「Port Redevelopment and Adjacent Area Development Act」 and the 「Marina Port Creation and Management Act」.
Under the current 「Port Act」, nationally managed ports such as Busan Port have been operated so far in terms of uniformity, publicity, and efficiency of ports because the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries has port-related authority such as the establishment of basic port plans. Over the years, the capacity of each local government has been strengthened more than in the past, and since the demand of local residents for decentralization is greater than ever, the central government has been Rather, local governments should exercise port-related authority on their own initiative to solve the problem of compatibility with urban planning. In addition, the role of port authorities within the jurisdiction is gradually increasing for the strengthening of port competitiveness, the autonomy of port operation, and professionalism of the port operation.
This study has organized the rational distribution of port-related rights into five major categories. First, the establishment of a basic port plan under the 「Port Act」 and the distribution of enforcement rights, second, the distribution of port management and operation rights under the 「Port Act」 Third, the distribution plan of port hinterland development plan and execution authority under 「Port Act」, fourth, establishment and implementation authority of basic port redevelopment plan under 「Port Redevelopment Act」, fifth, establishment and implementation of a basic plan under 「Marina Port Act」 Regarding the distribution method of authority, the distribution method were proposed along with the need for revision of related laws and systems.
According to the 「Port Act」 through a survey of experts, ‘allocation of authority to establish and implement basic plans for ports’ requires distribution of authority to local governments with an emphasis on connectivity with regions and locality of ports rather than maintaining the existing authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. For the competitiveness of ports, it is necessary to distribute authority to port authorities. According to the 「Port Act」, the distribution of the ‘right to manage and operate the port’ is not to maintain the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of port unity and port efficiency, but rather to distribute the authority to local governments in terms of connectivity with the region and locality of ports. This is necessary, and in terms of autonomy in port operation, it is necessary to distribute authority to port authorities.
In addition, the distribution of the ‘port hinterland development planning authority ’ under the 「Port Act」 is not about maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of unity, publicity, and efficiency of ports, but in terms of connectivity with the region, vitalization of the local economy, and locality of ports It is necessary to distribute powers to local governments
The distribution of the ‘authority to establish and implement basic plans for port redevelopment’ under the 「Port Redevelopment Act」 is based on the connection with the region rather than maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of the unity of ports, the publicity of ports, and the efficiency of resource distribution. It is necessary to distribute authority to local governments with an emphasis on economic revitalization and port locality.
Lastly, the distribution of the ‘marina port master plan establishment and implementation authority’ under the 「Marina Port Act」 is related to the region rather than maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of port uniformity, publicity of ports, and resource allocation efficiency. It is necessary to distribute authority to local governments with an emphasis on revitalizing the local economy and locality of ports.
Keywords: Port Autonomy, Port 3 Act, port authority, Port Development, Port Redevelopment, Marina Port
This study aims to improve the global competitiveness of Busan Port in line with the changes in the port logistics system of advanced overseas ports that are rapidly changing due to the 4th Industrial Revolution. The exercise of port-related authority between the central government, local governments, and port authorities in port development and management, raises the question of whether it is true that the central government exercises the authority for port development and management entirely, as well as raising the economic status of Busan Port. In order to improve the Busan Metropolitan City or the Busan Port Authority, the central government's port-related affairs started with a critical mind of how much port autonomy should be secured to enhance the global competitiveness of Busan Port.
The distribution of authority, such as port development and management, concentrated in the central government to local governments or port authorities is presented through a literature review and a survey of port-related experts, and the central government's position on port-related authority, The position of the local government and the position of the port authority are analyzed through previous studies, and how the authority of the central government, the authority of the local government, and the authority of the port authority are established in the 「Port Act」. This study tried to examine the provisions of the so-called 3 Port Acts, such as the 「Port Redevelopment and Adjacent Area Development Act」 and the 「Marina Port Creation and Management Act」.
Under the current 「Port Act」, nationally managed ports such as Busan Port have been operated so far in terms of uniformity, publicity, and efficiency of ports because the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries has port-related authority such as the establishment of basic port plans. Over the years, the capacity of each local government has been strengthened more than in the past, and since the demand of local residents for decentralization is greater than ever, the central government has been Rather, local governments should exercise port-related authority on their own initiative to solve the problem of compatibility with urban planning. In addition, the role of port authorities within the jurisdiction is gradually increasing for the strengthening of port competitiveness, the autonomy of port operation, and professionalism of the port operation.
This study has organized the rational distribution of port-related rights into five major categories. First, the establishment of a basic port plan under the 「Port Act」 and the distribution of enforcement rights, second, the distribution of port management and operation rights under the 「Port Act」 Third, the distribution plan of port hinterland development plan and execution authority under 「Port Act」, fourth, establishment and implementation authority of basic port redevelopment plan under 「Port Redevelopment Act」, fifth, establishment and implementation of a basic plan under 「Marina Port Act」 Regarding the distribution method of authority, the distribution method were proposed along with the need for revision of related laws and systems.
According to the 「Port Act」 through a survey of experts, ‘allocation of authority to establish and implement basic plans for ports’ requires distribution of authority to local governments with an emphasis on connectivity with regions and locality of ports rather than maintaining the existing authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries. For the competitiveness of ports, it is necessary to distribute authority to port authorities. According to the 「Port Act」, the distribution of the ‘right to manage and operate the port’ is not to maintain the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of port unity and port efficiency, but rather to distribute the authority to local governments in terms of connectivity with the region and locality of ports. This is necessary, and in terms of autonomy in port operation, it is necessary to distribute authority to port authorities.
In addition, the distribution of the ‘port hinterland development planning authority ’ under the 「Port Act」 is not about maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of unity, publicity, and efficiency of ports, but in terms of connectivity with the region, vitalization of the local economy, and locality of ports It is necessary to distribute powers to local governments
The distribution of the ‘authority to establish and implement basic plans for port redevelopment’ under the 「Port Redevelopment Act」 is based on the connection with the region rather than maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of the unity of ports, the publicity of ports, and the efficiency of resource distribution. It is necessary to distribute authority to local governments with an emphasis on economic revitalization and port locality.
Lastly, the distribution of the ‘marina port master plan establishment and implementation authority’ under the 「Marina Port Act」 is related to the region rather than maintaining the authority of the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries in terms of port uniformity, publicity of ports, and resource allocation efficiency. It is necessary to distribute authority to local governments with an emphasis on revitalizing the local economy and locality of ports.
Keywords: Port Autonomy, Port 3 Act, port authority, Port Development, Port Redevelopment, Marina Port
목차 (Table of Contents)
- 제 1 장 서 론 1
- 제1절 연구목적 1
- 제2절 연구범위와 연구방법 4
- Ⅰ. 연구의 범위 4
- Ⅱ. 연구의 방법 6
- 제 1 장 서 론 1
- 제1절 연구목적 1
- 제2절 연구범위와 연구방법 4
- Ⅰ. 연구의 범위 4
- Ⅱ. 연구의 방법 6
- 제 2 장 항만 관련 권한에 대한 이론 및 선행연구의 고찰 7
- 제1절 항만관리제도의 개관 7
- 제2절 우리나라 항만관리제도의 연혁 9
- 제3절 항만개발 및 관리 권한의 배분에 관한 선행 연구의 고찰 12
- Ⅰ. 중앙정부 입장의 선행연구 분석 12
- Ⅱ. 지방자치단체 입장의 선행연구 분석 18
- Ⅲ. 항만공사 입장의 선행연구 분석 28
- Ⅳ. 세계 주요 항만의 항만관리 권한 사례분석 및 시사점 35
- 제 3 장 항만 관련 기관의 권한 분석 및 한계 45
- 제1절 「항만법」의 권한 분석 및 한계 45
- Ⅰ. 중앙정부의 권한 46
- Ⅱ. 지방자치단체의 권한 51
- Ⅲ. 항만공사의 권한 55
- 제2절 「항만재개발 및 주변지역 발전에 관한 법률」의 권한 분석 및 한계 59
- Ⅰ. 중앙정부의 권한 60
- Ⅱ. 지방자치단체의 권한 62
- Ⅲ. 항만공사의 권한 65
- 제3절 「마리나항만의 조성 및 관리 등에 관한 법률」의 권한 분석 및 한계 69
- Ⅰ. 중앙정부의 권한 72
- Ⅱ. 지방자치단체의 권한 74
- Ⅲ. 항만공사의 권한 78
- 제 4 장 연구모형과 항만 관련 권한의 합리적 배분방안 79
- 제1절 선행연구의 핵심주장과 내용분석 79
- Ⅰ. 중앙정부 입장의 핵심주장 79
- Ⅱ. 지방자치단체 입장의 핵심주장 81
- Ⅲ. 항만공사 입장의 핵심주장 85
- Ⅳ. 선행연구로부터 본 연구의 변수 선정 88
- 제2절 연구의 분석틀과 가설설정 91
- Ⅰ. 연구의 분석틀 91
- Ⅱ. 가설설정 93
- 제3절 자료수집과 가설검증 96
- Ⅰ. 자료수집과 표본의 특성 96
- Ⅱ. 통계분석과 가설검증 100
- 제4절 항만 관련 권한의 합리적 배분방안 118
- Ⅰ. 항만 관련 권한의 배분기준 118
- Ⅱ. 권한의 합리적 배분방안 124
- 제 5 장 결 론 132
- 참 고 문 헌 135
- 부 록 140
- 국 문 초 록 144
참고문헌 (Reference)
1. 사회과학 통계분석, 김호정, 서울: 삼영사, , 1996
2. 항만업무편람, 2021~2022, 해양수산부, , 2022
3. 대도시 항만의 이론과 정책, 김영호, 초대 울산항 도선사 류대혁 퇴임기 념 논문집, , 1993
4. 2030항만정책 방향과 추진전략, 해양수산부, , 2020
5. 부산경남항만공사법 법제화 연구, 경상남도, 부산광역시, , 2021
6. 제4차(2021~2030) 전국 항만기본계획, 해양수산부, , 2020
7. 항만공사의 지배구조에 관한연구, 강윤호, 지방정부연구제26권 제1 호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2022
8. 제2차(2020~2029) 마리나항만 기본계획, 해양수산부, , 2020
9. 제3차(2021~2030) 항만재개발 기본계획, 해양수산부, , 2020
10. 해양문화와 바다중심사고로의 전환, 이윤정, 해양국토21제3권, 한국 해양수산발원, , 2009
1. 사회과학 통계분석, 김호정, 서울: 삼영사, , 1996
2. 항만업무편람, 2021~2022, 해양수산부, , 2022
3. 대도시 항만의 이론과 정책, 김영호, 초대 울산항 도선사 류대혁 퇴임기 념 논문집, , 1993
4. 2030항만정책 방향과 추진전략, 해양수산부, , 2020
5. 부산경남항만공사법 법제화 연구, 경상남도, 부산광역시, , 2021
6. 제4차(2021~2030) 전국 항만기본계획, 해양수산부, , 2020
7. 항만공사의 지배구조에 관한연구, 강윤호, 지방정부연구제26권 제1 호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2022
8. 제2차(2020~2029) 마리나항만 기본계획, 해양수산부, , 2020
9. 제3차(2021~2030) 항만재개발 기본계획, 해양수산부, , 2020
10. 해양문화와 바다중심사고로의 전환, 이윤정, 해양국토21제3권, 한국 해양수산발원, , 2009
11. 도시계획법의 발전적 개편방안 연구, 최병선, 대한국토계획학회지제 29권 제3호, 대한국토ㆍ도시계획학회, , 1994
12. 연근해 침적폐기물 정화관리지표 개발, 김상구, 우양호, 한국어촌어항협 회, , 2012
13. 항만재개발사업의 공공성에 관한 고찰, 이혜령, 김근섭, 한승훈, 해양 정책연구제37권 제1호, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2021
14. 부산시 해양수도 건설의 자치역량 분석, 김상구, 인문사회21제13권 제2호, (사)아시아문화학술원, , 2022
15. 부산항만공사(BPA)의 법적지위 개선방안, 최진이, (사)한국지방정부학회 추계학술대회 및 찾아가는 부산진구 지방재정세미나 발표논문집, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2021
16. 성공적 항만재개발을 위한 정부의 역할, 신승식, 해양물류연구제16 권, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2010
17. 중앙과 지방의 항만관리 역할분담 연구, 박형준, , 2017
18. 새로운 항만개발 및 관리제도의 구축방안, 정필수, 김형태, 정책연구 98-03, 한국해양수산개발원, , 1998
19. 해양수도 구현을 위한 해양산업 기본계획, 부산광역시, , 2018
20. 항만공사(PA)의 지배구조 고찰 및 개선방안, 최성두, 항만공사 자율성 확보 및 책임성 강화를 위한 전문가토론회 발표논문집, (사)한국지 방정부학회, , 2021
21. 부산광역시의 해양환경 관리 자치역량 분석, 송영채, 박상희, 이경은, 강은숙, 김상구, 최성두, 한국항해항만학회지제32권 제6호, 한국항 해항만학회, , 2008
22. 제5차 국토종합계획, 제3편 전략별 추진계획, 대한민국정부, 항만의 물류서비 스 혁신, , 2019
23. 항만공사제도를 통한 해양자치권 확보 방안, 박병주, 장하용, 이민규, 박충훈, (사)한국지방정부학회 2021년도 하계학술대회 발표자료 집, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2021
24. 항만관리체제 이관에 따른 인천시 대응방안, 김운수, 인천발전연구원, , 2010
25. 현정부 항만공사(PA) 설립방안의 문제점 평가, 최성두, 지방정부연구 제6권 제3호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2002
26. 해외 주요 항만공사 현황 및 시사점 내부자료, 부산항만공사, , 2018
27. 한국 항만개발정책에 대한 신제도주의적 분석, 이동현, 해양정책연구 제24권 제2호, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2009
28. 중국항만관리제도 및 물동량의 변화에 대한 연구, 최운한, 석사학위논문, 중앙대학교, 서울, 대한민국, , 2018
29. 해양수도 부산, 해양도시 부산은 해양자치로부터, 정영석, 부산 해양 콘 퍼런스, , 2019
30. 부산 해양산업의 지역경제 부가가치 기여도 분 석, 김상열, 이민규, 박선율, 해양정책연구제34권 제1호, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2019
31. 대도시 항만관리체계 조정방안에 대한 탐색적 연구, 정주택, 지방정부 연구제6권 제2호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2002
32. 우리나라 항만의 경쟁력 확보방안과 경남도의 역할, 이홍걸, (사)한국지 방정부학회 동계학술대회 발표자료집, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2005
33. 항만자유무역지역 투자유치의 경제적 파급효과 연구, 김균태, 강준구, 이성우, 해양정책연구제27권 제1호, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2012
34. 지방분권에 따른 항만관리의 변화와 효율적 대응방안, 박남기, (사)한국 지방정부학회추계학술대회 발표자료집, (사)한국지방정보학회, , 2018
35. 해양레저관광 중심의 부산지역 마리나 조성 방안 연구, 서종열, 석사학위 논문, 부산대학교, 부산, 대한민국, , 2018
36. 해양산업 발전을 위한 중앙권한 지방이 양에 관한 연구, 김상구, 최성두, 이광남, 허윤수, 현안연구(2018-03-796), 부산발전연구원, , 2018
37. 동북아 해양수도 부산 구현을 위한 해양자치권 확보방 안, 손용구, 김상구, (사)한국지방정부학회 2020년도 동계학술대회 발표 자료 집, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2021
38. 퍼지AHP를 이용한 부산신항의 항만관리 방안에 관한 연 구, 김성국, 이강웅, 지방정부연구제7권 제2호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2003
39. 수익성 및 공공성 확보를 위한 항만재개발 정책방향 연 구, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2009
40. 항만관리의 지자체 위임 및 이양에 따른 영향 및 대응방안, 전찬영, 이종필, 김근섭, 서울: 한국해양수산개발원, , 2010
41. 선박에서 배출되는 대기오염물질관리 개선방안에 관한 연구, 손용구, 석 사학위논문, 한국해양대학교, 부산, 대한민국, , 2018
42. 개방형 항만정책 수립체제의 필요성과 구축방안에 관한 연구, 김형태, 해양정책연구제22권 제1호, 한국해양수산개발원, , 2007
43. 해양수도 부산의 항만경쟁력 강화를 위한 해양행정체계 모색, 최성두, 지방정부연구제10권 제4호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2006
44. 부산항만공사의 자율성 강화를 위한 항만이해관계자의 인 식 연구, 최진이, 최성두, 한국항해항만학회지제46권 제1호, 한국항해항만학회, , 2022
45. 해양수산업의 지역경제 파급효과 분석-부산, 울산, 경남을 중심으로, Nikolas Tromp, 김태진, 해양정책연구제35권 제2호, 한국해양수산개 발원, , 2020
46. 지방정부의 항만계획기능 참여방안에 관한 연구 – 부산항 을 중심으로, 이원일, 김상구, 한국행정학보제33권 제1호, 한국행정학회, , 1999
47. 정부간 항만배후단지개발ㆍ관리 기능배분에 관한 연구: 부 산항신항 중심, 김보영, 강윤호, 한국항만학회지제33권 제10호, 한국항만학회, , 2018
48. 한국 항만재개발사업의 활성화를 위한 정책적ㆍ제도적 쟁점에 대 한 연구, 오영록, 석사학위논문, 한양대학교 공공정책대학원, 서울, 대한민 국, , 2015
49. 항만이 해항도시의 경제성장에 미치는 효과: 부산과 인천의 사례 (1985-2007), 우양호, 지방정부연구제13권 제3호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2009
50. 부산시 해양수도 구현의 수준과 발전방안 – 객관적 지표 의 분석을 중심으로, 손용구, 김상구, 인문사회21제12권 제1호, (사)아시아문화 학술원, , 2021
51. 지방정부 항만자치의 내실화와 발전방안: 주요 항만공사(PA)의 성 과를 중심으로, 우양호, (사)한국지방정부학회 동계학술대회 발표자료 집, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2012
52. 협상방법의 결정요인과 결합유형에 관한 연구 – 환경기초시설의 갈등해소를 중심으로, 김상구, 박사학위논문, 부산대학교, 부산, 대한민국, , 2002
53. 항만분권의 핵심의제는 무엇인가? 프랑스 항만법 전에 대한 시멘틱 네트워크 분석을 중심으로, 정수현, 이유현, 서인석, 지방행정연구제 33권 제3호, 한국지방행정연구원, , 2019
54. 미국 항만 거버넌스 제도의 형성과 변화: 뉴욕ㆍ뉴저지 항만지구를 둘러싼 뉴욕과 뉴저지간 갈등과 협력, 강윤호, 지방정부연구제12권 제 4호, (사)한국지방정부학회, , 2008
분석정보
이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료
나만을 위한 추천자료
