RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      学習者中心からみた相互評価の実践と課題 ― 日本語会話授業における学習者の意識変容分析を中心に ― = Learner-centered Mutual Assessment Practices and Challenges: Focusing on the Analysis of Changes in Learners’ Consciousness in Japanese Conversation Classes

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109268945

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      学習者中心・学習者主体という教育概念が日本語教育に取り入れられて久しいが、そのような教育概念下で行われている学習評価も果たして学習者中心の評価方法なのだろうかという問題意識から、学習者中心授業における学習評価を「学習者も評価に関わり、その評価の実施プロセスにおいては、他者との関係性の中で学習者の学習が促進されるもの」と定義し、学習者参加型評価のひとつである相互評価を実践した。そしてインタビューデータを基に、学習者の意識変容を修正版グラウンデッドセオリー・アプローチ(M-GTA)により分析した。その結果、31の概念と9のカテゴリーが生成された。相互評価により、「学びの実感」や「実力向上」を感じた学習者、「前向きな態度形成」がなされた学習者が存在した一方で、「教授者評価への固執」、「交友関係、評価力への懸念」、「捉え方のずれ」のある学習者も存在した。さらに成績反映に関しては「客観性欠如による成績反映反対」、「成績未反映が条件で負担減少」、「信頼感形成による成績反映賛成」の学習者が存在したことが明らかになった。先行研究と比較するとプラス面よりもマイナス面の概念がより多く生成され、韓国の大学生が従来持っていた評価や成績に関する認識をより詳細に把握できた。これらの分析結果を踏まえ、学習者中心授業における学習評価としての相互評価実践を改善するため、合意形成の観点、フィードバック・リテラシーの観点から考察し、改善策を提示した。
      번역하기

      学習者中心・学習者主体という教育概念が日本語教育に取り入れられて久しいが、そのような教育概念下で行われている学習評価も果たして学習者中心の評価方法なのだろうかという問...

      学習者中心・学習者主体という教育概念が日本語教育に取り入れられて久しいが、そのような教育概念下で行われている学習評価も果たして学習者中心の評価方法なのだろうかという問題意識から、学習者中心授業における学習評価を「学習者も評価に関わり、その評価の実施プロセスにおいては、他者との関係性の中で学習者の学習が促進されるもの」と定義し、学習者参加型評価のひとつである相互評価を実践した。そしてインタビューデータを基に、学習者の意識変容を修正版グラウンデッドセオリー・アプローチ(M-GTA)により分析した。その結果、31の概念と9のカテゴリーが生成された。相互評価により、「学びの実感」や「実力向上」を感じた学習者、「前向きな態度形成」がなされた学習者が存在した一方で、「教授者評価への固執」、「交友関係、評価力への懸念」、「捉え方のずれ」のある学習者も存在した。さらに成績反映に関しては「客観性欠如による成績反映反対」、「成績未反映が条件で負担減少」、「信頼感形成による成績反映賛成」の学習者が存在したことが明らかになった。先行研究と比較するとプラス面よりもマイナス面の概念がより多く生成され、韓国の大学生が従来持っていた評価や成績に関する認識をより詳細に把握できた。これらの分析結果を踏まえ、学習者中心授業における学習評価としての相互評価実践を改善するため、合意形成の観点、フィードバック・リテラシーの観点から考察し、改善策を提示した。

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Learner-centered education has long been incorporated into Japanese language education. Based on this concept of education, this study defines the learner's evaluation in a learner-centered class as “the learner is also involved in the evaluation and the learner's learning is facilitated in the relationship with others.” Based on interview data, the learner's change of consciousness was analyzed by a modified theoretical approach (M-GTA).
      As a result, 31 concepts and 9 categories were generated. While there were learners who felt “realization of learning” or “improvement of ability” through mutual evaluation, there were also learners who had “adherence to professor evaluation,” “concerns about friendship and evaluation ability,” and “misunderstanding.” Furthermore, it has been revealed that there are learners who oppose the reflection of grades due to lack of objectivity, reduce the burden on conditions where grades are not reflected, and support the reflection of grades through trust formation.
      Compared to previous studies, more negative concepts were created than positive ones, and Korean university students were able to understand evaluations and perceptions of grades more specifically. In order to improve the practice of mutual evaluation through learning evaluation in learner-centered classes, improvement measures were proposed in terms of agreement formation and feedback literacy.
      번역하기

      Learner-centered education has long been incorporated into Japanese language education. Based on this concept of education, this study defines the learner's evaluation in a learner-centered class as “the learner is also involved in the evaluation an...

      Learner-centered education has long been incorporated into Japanese language education. Based on this concept of education, this study defines the learner's evaluation in a learner-centered class as “the learner is also involved in the evaluation and the learner's learning is facilitated in the relationship with others.” Based on interview data, the learner's change of consciousness was analyzed by a modified theoretical approach (M-GTA).
      As a result, 31 concepts and 9 categories were generated. While there were learners who felt “realization of learning” or “improvement of ability” through mutual evaluation, there were also learners who had “adherence to professor evaluation,” “concerns about friendship and evaluation ability,” and “misunderstanding.” Furthermore, it has been revealed that there are learners who oppose the reflection of grades due to lack of objectivity, reduce the burden on conditions where grades are not reflected, and support the reflection of grades through trust formation.
      Compared to previous studies, more negative concepts were created than positive ones, and Korean university students were able to understand evaluations and perceptions of grades more specifically. In order to improve the practice of mutual evaluation through learning evaluation in learner-centered classes, improvement measures were proposed in terms of agreement formation and feedback literacy.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼