Mongol’s intervention in the succession process of the throne of the nearby states was actually an act of officially “installing” kings and lords in those perimeter states. It was performed as a formality within East Asian international relation...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Mongol’s intervention in the succession process of the throne of the nearby states was actually an act of officially “installing” kings and lords in those perimeter states. It was performed as a formality within East Asian international relation...
Mongol’s intervention in the succession process of the throne of the nearby states was actually an act of officially “installing” kings and lords in those perimeter states. It was performed as a formality within East Asian international relations, but was also based upon Mongol traditions. This paper has shown that Mongol intervention in the succession of the Koryŏ throne was one of those examples. How it changed the dynamics inside Koryŏ is observed in this article. As the relationship with the Mongol emperor as well as the imperial family became more and more important to the Koryŏ king’s royal authority and the succession of the Koryŏ throne which would only be completed by the aforementioned “installation” process, traditional blood ties within the Koryŏ family becomes less and less crucial. The Koryŏ T’eja figure used to obtain the throne and ensure the stability of its own royal authority based on traditional blood ties, but in this period the T’eja seat itself lost its prior political and meaning, and the kešig system replaced its functions. These changes also affected the Koryŏ king’s royal authority, and the existing Koryŏ hierarchy based on blood relations was severely distorted. The political center (of Koryŏ) itself was shattered, and then created was a structure where the king was unable to control other power subjects. The king was no longer at the top of that hierarchy. The emperor was. In sum, in order to adequately observe this time period, we need to consider that the relationship formed between Koryŏ and the empire was a result of Mongol’s own relationship-forming method. We should be aware that Mongol Empire’s blatant intervention in the Koryŏ throne succession process was neither impulsive nor random, but only occurred as a systemically determined decision. What should be noted is that this caused the literal “relativization” of the Koryŏ royal authority, which directly affected the status of the Koryŏ king and his vassals, meaning of concepts and systems concerning the Koryŏ throne itself, and the relationship between political powers, in an irrevocable fashion.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 채웅석, "고려중기 외척의 위상과 정치적 역할" 한국중세사학회 (38) : 335-372, 2014
2 김철웅, "고려시대의 태자 책봉과 책봉례" 부산경남사학회 (80) : 25-57, 2011
3 Lee, Myungmi., "고려·원 왕실통혼의 정치적 의미" 49 : 7-85, 2003
4 김창겸, "고려 顯宗代 東宮官 설치" 고려사학회 (33) : 131-167, 2008
5 Matsuda, Takashi., "“The Formation of Yunnam Haengseong”雲南行省の成立" 418/419/420/421 : 421-442, 1980
6 Hayashi, Kenichiro., "“Dan Family Prefects of Yüan Dynasty Yunnam”元代雲南 の段氏總管" 78 (78): 245-279, 1996
7 Kim, Ho-dong., "The Mongol Empire and the Birth of World History 몽골제국과세계사의 탄생" Dolbaegae 2010
8 Kim, Ho-dong., "The Mongol Empire and Koryŏ 몽골제국과 고려" Seoul National University Press 2007
9 Seo, Sung-ho., "The Development of the Political Environment under Sukjeong and Political Powers"숙종대 정국의 추이와 정치세력" 9 : 14-39, 1993
10 Kim, Kwang-cheol., "Research on Power Classes in the Latter Half of the Koryŏ Era 高麗後期 世族層 硏究" Donga University Press 1991
1 채웅석, "고려중기 외척의 위상과 정치적 역할" 한국중세사학회 (38) : 335-372, 2014
2 김철웅, "고려시대의 태자 책봉과 책봉례" 부산경남사학회 (80) : 25-57, 2011
3 Lee, Myungmi., "고려·원 왕실통혼의 정치적 의미" 49 : 7-85, 2003
4 김창겸, "고려 顯宗代 東宮官 설치" 고려사학회 (33) : 131-167, 2008
5 Matsuda, Takashi., "“The Formation of Yunnam Haengseong”雲南行省の成立" 418/419/420/421 : 421-442, 1980
6 Hayashi, Kenichiro., "“Dan Family Prefects of Yüan Dynasty Yunnam”元代雲南 の段氏總管" 78 (78): 245-279, 1996
7 Kim, Ho-dong., "The Mongol Empire and the Birth of World History 몽골제국과세계사의 탄생" Dolbaegae 2010
8 Kim, Ho-dong., "The Mongol Empire and Koryŏ 몽골제국과 고려" Seoul National University Press 2007
9 Seo, Sung-ho., "The Development of the Political Environment under Sukjeong and Political Powers"숙종대 정국의 추이와 정치세력" 9 : 14-39, 1993
10 Kim, Kwang-cheol., "Research on Power Classes in the Latter Half of the Koryŏ Era 高麗後期 世族層 硏究" Donga University Press 1991
11 Shim, Jae-seok., "Research on Installations of Kings in Koryŏ 高麗國王冊封 硏究" Hyean 2002
12 Jeong, Yong-suk., "Queens during the Koryŏ Dynasty 고려시대의 后妃" Minum 1992
13 ad-Dîn, Rashîd., "Khan’s Descendants 칸의 후예들" Sagyejeol Publications 2005
14 Ri, Chi-ahn., "Enfeoffment System under the Yüan Dynasty 元代分封制度硏究" Cheonjingojeok 1989
15 Robinson, David M., "Empire’s Twilight : Northeast Asia Under the Mongols" Harvard University Press 2009
16 Jeong, Yong-suk., "A Study on Endogamy within Koryŏ’s Royal Family 高麗王室 族內婚 硏究" Saemoon 1988
17 Lee, Myungmi., "13~14세기 고려·몽골 관계 연구: 정동행성승상 부마고려국왕, 그 복합적 위상에 대한 탐구" Hyean 2016
18 Morihira, Masahiko., ""Yüan Dynasty Kešig System and the Koryŏ Royal Family—The Significance of Turkak in the Koryŏ-Yüan Relationship"元朝ケシク制度と高麗王家-高麗·元關係における禿魯花の意義について" 110 (110): 234-263, 2001
19 Lee, Ik-ju., ""The Structure of the Koryŏ-Yüan Relationship and the Political System in the Latter Half of the Koryŏ Era"高麗·元 관계의構造와 高麗後期 政治體制" Seoul National University 1996
20 Koo, Beom-jin., ""The Political Status of the ‘King’ in the Mongol Empire"蒙元帝國期 ‘國王’의 政治的 位相" 23 : 1-23, 1999
21 Joo, Chae-hyuk., ""The Hongbokwon Family and the Koryŏ-Yüan Relationship"홍복원일가와 여원관계" 24 : 1-53, 1974
Building a New Nation: Chooyang, Han Gyeongjik and His Ideological Influence in Making Modern Korea
East Asian Unconscious of Translation and World Literature
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2017-03-07 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : The Academy of Korean -> The Academy of Korean Studies | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-04-09 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : The Review of Korean Studies외국어명 : The Review of Korean Studies | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.22 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.18 | 0.2 | 0.769 | 0.07 |