RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      문화복지 부문 복권기금이 지원한 전통나눔사업의 의미와 평가 = The Lottery-funded Grants for the Arts and Cultural Welfare: Meaning and Evaluation of the “Community Outreach Program”

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A99775136

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Since 2004, a variety of cultural programs for the arts and literature have been developed in Korea through the use funding collected from the profits of the national lottery. The Lottery-funded Grants for the Arts and Cultural Welfare were establishe...

      Since 2004, a variety of cultural programs for the arts and literature have been developed in Korea through the use funding collected from the profits of the national lottery. The Lottery-funded Grants for the Arts and Cultural Welfare were established according to the ``Lottery Tickets and Lottery Fund Act`` by the Lottery Commission at the Ministry of Strategy and Finance. As one of the funded programs, the Community Outreach Program through Traditional Culture was carried out over 2004 to 2011 for the public benefit as the Flexible Benefit Plan or Cafeteria Benefit Plan that focused on the traditional performing arts. It was presented and designed for neglected social groups such as economically under privileged social groups, senior citizens, multicultural citizens, and people living in remote areas. The primary goal was to promote cultural awareness and enjoyment through the arts. Not only did the community outreach program benefit these selected audiences, it also was of great benefit to the traditional performing artists as well as it brought them out of isolation and into the public view. The program received positive evaluation from the public for successfully attaining the goals reflecting the government policies in improving the quality of lives of the neglected social groups as well as providing the foundation for awakening the artistic creativity of the artists, arts community and cultural organizations. However, the presenters of the program from a number of quasi-government agencies have been questioning the ``character of public interest`` defined by the Lottery Commission who tend to focus on external results rather than improving the quality of the program itself. In response to the reaction of the policies of the Lottery Commission, the presenters have been raising important issues that urge both rethinking and revision of the program. It also strives to maintain the original goal of improving the lives of marginalized and neglected socials groups through the reconsideration of the current policies. This paper investigates the concept of cultural welfare and examines the development phase of the cultural policies on the Lottery-funded Grants for the arts and cultural welfare. The article further explores the reevaluation of the true ``character of public interest,`` its concept, and how to enhance the system of governance through the Community Outreach Program via the cultural programming of the traditional performing arts. Although the Community Outreach Program, which lasted for eight years, has been positively evaluated in contributing to the increase of the program`s audience members, the Community Outreach Program for neglected social groups is still under criticism due to shortcomings in actually improving the quality of the arts for the public. In other words a series of efforts have been made for acquiring the public aspects of the traditional performing arts as a public enterprise which was made possible by the Lottery-funded Grants for the Arts and Cultural Welfare. This is meaningful, on the one hand, in considering the facets of understanding the promotion of traditional performing arts as an area of cultural welfare. On the other hand, there still remains the question of targeting only the neglected social groups through programs such as the Flexible Benefit Plan, as opposed to being more inclusive with the general population in the area of general public welfare.

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼