RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      What We Are Missing in the Analysis of Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing: Empirical Evidence from South Korea

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108908699

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose – This study theoretically points out that when measuring the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing, the cross-sectional variance decomposition method developed by Asdrubali, Sørensen and Yosha (1996) can result in biased estimates. This occurs because the method does not classify money flows for risk sharing into intranational and international categories. To overcome these limitations, the study proposes the use of Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method.
      Design/methodology – This study investigates, first, that analyzing intranational consumption risk sharing based on the variance decomposition method will inevitably produce biased estimation.
      Second, it examines how Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method estimates the effects of risk sharing by separating the domestic sources of money from overseas ones. As empirical evidence for these theoretical discussions, a comparative analysis is performed by using both methodologies to estimate South Korea’s intranational and international consumption risk sharing.
      Findings – The empirical results confirm that the variance decomposition method produced a biased estimation of the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing. Specifically, in South Korea, the degree of consumption risk sharing via capital and credit markets was overestimated, and that via the tax-transfer system was underestimated. The results also prove that Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method is effective not only in reducing the bias of the estimation results but also in measuring the degree of international consumption risk sharing for individual countries.
      Originality/value – Despite numerous studies that have capitalized on the variance decomposition method, little scholarly attention has been paid to the occurrence of bias in the method. Hence, this study makes a noteworthy academic contribution by addressing this under-researched area.
      Additionally, it stands out as the first of its kind to pioneer the utilization of Asdrubali and Kim So- Young’s (2011) method, offering a groundbreaking analysis of intranational and international consumption risk sharing.
      번역하기

      Purpose – This study theoretically points out that when measuring the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing, the cross-sectional variance decomposition method developed by Asdrubali, Sørensen and Yosha (1996) can result in biased estimat...

      Purpose – This study theoretically points out that when measuring the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing, the cross-sectional variance decomposition method developed by Asdrubali, Sørensen and Yosha (1996) can result in biased estimates. This occurs because the method does not classify money flows for risk sharing into intranational and international categories. To overcome these limitations, the study proposes the use of Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method.
      Design/methodology – This study investigates, first, that analyzing intranational consumption risk sharing based on the variance decomposition method will inevitably produce biased estimation.
      Second, it examines how Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method estimates the effects of risk sharing by separating the domestic sources of money from overseas ones. As empirical evidence for these theoretical discussions, a comparative analysis is performed by using both methodologies to estimate South Korea’s intranational and international consumption risk sharing.
      Findings – The empirical results confirm that the variance decomposition method produced a biased estimation of the degree of intranational consumption risk sharing. Specifically, in South Korea, the degree of consumption risk sharing via capital and credit markets was overestimated, and that via the tax-transfer system was underestimated. The results also prove that Asdrubali and Kim So-Young’s (2011) method is effective not only in reducing the bias of the estimation results but also in measuring the degree of international consumption risk sharing for individual countries.
      Originality/value – Despite numerous studies that have capitalized on the variance decomposition method, little scholarly attention has been paid to the occurrence of bias in the method. Hence, this study makes a noteworthy academic contribution by addressing this under-researched area.
      Additionally, it stands out as the first of its kind to pioneer the utilization of Asdrubali and Kim So- Young’s (2011) method, offering a groundbreaking analysis of intranational and international consumption risk sharing.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Lewis, K. K., "What Can Explain the Apparent Lack of International Consumption Risk Sharing?" 104 (104): 267-297, 1996

      2 Asdrubali, P., "The Dynamics of Asian Financial Integration" Routledge 102-117, 2011

      3 Townsend, R. M., "Risk and Insurance in Village India" 62 (62): 539-591, 1994

      4 Kim, So-Young, "Regional Versus Global Risk Sharing in East Asia" 3 (3): 182-201, 2004

      5 Borge, L. -E., "Public Employment and Regional Risk Sharing" 106 (106): 215-230, 2004

      6 Ng, S., "Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power" 69 (69): 1519-1554, 2001

      7 French, K. R., "Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets" 81 (81): 222-226, 1991

      8 Ko, Joong-San, "Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing in South Korea : 2000–2016" 34 (34): 29-49, 2020

      9 Labhard, V., "International and Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing: The Evidence for the United Kingdom and OECD”" Bank of England 302-, 2006

      10 Sørensen, B. E., "International Risk Sharing and European Monetary Unification" 45 (45): 211-238, 1998

      1 Lewis, K. K., "What Can Explain the Apparent Lack of International Consumption Risk Sharing?" 104 (104): 267-297, 1996

      2 Asdrubali, P., "The Dynamics of Asian Financial Integration" Routledge 102-117, 2011

      3 Townsend, R. M., "Risk and Insurance in Village India" 62 (62): 539-591, 1994

      4 Kim, So-Young, "Regional Versus Global Risk Sharing in East Asia" 3 (3): 182-201, 2004

      5 Borge, L. -E., "Public Employment and Regional Risk Sharing" 106 (106): 215-230, 2004

      6 Ng, S., "Lag Length Selection and the Construction of Unit Root Tests with Good Size and Power" 69 (69): 1519-1554, 2001

      7 French, K. R., "Investor Diversification and International Equity Markets" 81 (81): 222-226, 1991

      8 Ko, Joong-San, "Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing in South Korea : 2000–2016" 34 (34): 29-49, 2020

      9 Labhard, V., "International and Intranational Consumption Risk Sharing: The Evidence for the United Kingdom and OECD”" Bank of England 302-, 2006

      10 Sørensen, B. E., "International Risk Sharing and European Monetary Unification" 45 (45): 211-238, 1998

      11 Canova, F., "International Consumption Risk Sharing" 37 (37): 573-601, 1996

      12 Altug, S., "Household Choices in Equilibrium" 58 (58): 543-570, 1990

      13 Mace, B. J., "Full Insurance in the Presence of Aggregate Uncertainty" 99 (99): 928-956, 1991

      14 Kim, So-Young, "Financial Integration and Consumption Risk Sharing in East Asia" 18 (18): 143-157, 2006

      15 Elliott, G., "Efficient Tests for an Autoregressive Unit Root" 64 (64): 813-836, 1996

      16 Kim, D., "Consumption Risk-Sharing within Australia and with New Zealand" 83 (83): 46-59, 2007

      17 고중산, "Consumption Risk Sharing in ASEAN: A Comparison of the ASEAN+3, East Asia, the OECD, and the Eurozone" 경제연구소 33 (33): 73-97, 2020

      18 Beyer, A., "Constructing Historical Euro-zone Data" 111 (111): 102-121, 2001

      19 Balli, F., "Channels of Risk-sharing among Canadian Provinces : 1961–2006" 43 : 763-787, 2012

      20 Asdrubali, P., "Channels of Interstate Risk Sharing : United States 1963–1990" 111 (111): 1081-1110, 1996

      21 Cochrane, J. H., "A Simple Test of Consumption Insurance" 99 (99): 957-976, 1991

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼