This study analyzed the process that the financial market crisis in the late Qing Dynasty threatened the stability of customs administration through the Jin Haiguan (津海關, a customs office) in Tianjin, China. The proxy tax collection structure of...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A108050323
2022
-
해관은호 ; 광동체제 ; 해관감독 ; 행상 ; 海關銀號 ; 廣東體制 ; 海關監督 ; 行商 ; Customs bank ; Canton system ; Superintendent ; Hong merchant
KCI등재
학술저널
199-232(34쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
This study analyzed the process that the financial market crisis in the late Qing Dynasty threatened the stability of customs administration through the Jin Haiguan (津海關, a customs office) in Tianjin, China. The proxy tax collection structure of...
This study analyzed the process that the financial market crisis in the late Qing Dynasty threatened the stability of customs administration through the Jin Haiguan (津海關, a customs office) in Tianjin, China. The proxy tax collection structure of customs in the Qing Dynasty was a device to manage the costs and risks produced in the procedure of administration by the tax collection authorities. The tax collection contractors were guaranteed the right to operate customs duties in return for participating in the tax collection business. After the disintegration of the Canton system, the Qing Dynasty installed Customs banks, superseding the Hong merchants who were in charge of the tax collection contracting business during the early period. The tax collection was delegated to operators selected by the Superintendents. The late tax collection contracting business was led by Qianzhuang and Yin hao (錢莊, 銀號, traditional Chinese banking institutions), which were engaged in the conventional financial industry.
As the Customs banks profited from loans and receipts based on the right to operate tax revenue, the financial market conditions significantly affected their profitability. The two financial crises in Tianjin in the 1900s distinctly implicated the adverse imp act of market changes on the stability of the Customs banks’ ta x collection structure. The first was damage to the Customs banks due to the deterioration of currency quality. As a result of the tax collection contractors taking on the risk of customs administration, the Qing Dynasty maintained stable tax revenue, while the profitability of the Customs banks was inevitably degraded. The second was the prospect of bankruptcy as the financial environment was aggravated. The Customs banks’ stability and profitability through managing considerable quantities of tax revenue through financial activities were destined to suffer a severe blow when market liquidity was restricted.
The first crisis succeeded in early settlement through the active intervention of the Qing Dynasty. The local authorities normalized the currency quality, and the market immediately stabilized. However, the second crisis rendered the Qing dynasty unable to address due to the aftermath of the revolution, precipitating the collapse of the financial market in Tianjin. According to the nature of the financial market in the late Qing Dynasty based on the credit economy, the bankruptcies of financial institutions generated a chain reaction, and financial institutions that had direct or indirect claim-obligation relationship with a Customs bank A in Tianjin started to fail as well.
Nonetheless, in the second crisis, the Qing Dynasty did not protect the Customs banks but instead reclaimed Liu Feng bank’s right to operate the Customs banks and transferred it to HSBC. Although the local government showed an active move to support the Customs banks in the unstable market situation, it was to thoroughly ensure the stability of the tax revenue administration. Under the circumstances where the possibility of A’s bankruptcy increased, the tax collection authority decided to replace the tax collection contractors rather than bear the risk. It was a typical coping mechanism of the bureaucracy, which prioritized the stability of customs administration.
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 "順川時報"
2 龔關, "近代天津金融業研究: 1861—1936" 天津人民出版社 2007
3 宋美雲, "近代天津商會" 天津社會科學院出版社 2002
4 宋美雲, "近代商會化解金融風潮之探析 -以天津爲中心的考察-" 3 : 2005
5 本野英一, "辛亥革命期上海の中英債権債務處理分爭-1910年「ゴム株式恐」慌後の民事訴訟事例分析-" 60 (60): 300-332, 2001
6 정혜중, "辛亥革命 이전 天津에서 山西票號와 天津銀號의 금융활동" 명청사학회 (24) : 329-352, 2005
7 "申報"
8 榮曉峰, "清末天津化寶銀危機與制度調整" 6 : 2020
9 蕭文嫻, "清末上海における事業投資とその資金調達 -ゴム株式恐慌(1910年)に至る過程を中心に-" 63 (63): 1997
10 佐藤究, "清末の源豊潤票鋭による震替迭金について: 上海ゴム株恐慌と源豊潤票践の倒産" 1999
1 "順川時報"
2 龔關, "近代天津金融業研究: 1861—1936" 天津人民出版社 2007
3 宋美雲, "近代天津商會" 天津社會科學院出版社 2002
4 宋美雲, "近代商會化解金融風潮之探析 -以天津爲中心的考察-" 3 : 2005
5 本野英一, "辛亥革命期上海の中英債権債務處理分爭-1910年「ゴム株式恐」慌後の民事訴訟事例分析-" 60 (60): 300-332, 2001
6 정혜중, "辛亥革命 이전 天津에서 山西票號와 天津銀號의 금융활동" 명청사학회 (24) : 329-352, 2005
7 "申報"
8 榮曉峰, "清末天津化寶銀危機與制度調整" 6 : 2020
9 蕭文嫻, "清末上海における事業投資とその資金調達 -ゴム株式恐慌(1910年)に至る過程を中心に-" 63 (63): 1997
10 佐藤究, "清末の源豊潤票鋭による震替迭金について: 上海ゴム株恐慌と源豊潤票践の倒産" 1999
11 임지환, "淸末 民國初 天津錢莊의 發展" 19·20 : 1997
12 임지환, "淸末 上海 金融市場의 金融風潮" 21·22, : 1999
13 "東方雜志"
14 "時報"
15 王路曼, "投機之外的危機:國家政治視角下的1910年上海“橡皮股票風潮”" 2014
16 孫睿, "市場與國家:近代天津錢業公會與經濟秩序建構" 中國社會科學出版社 2017
17 天津市檔案館, "天津海關檔案" 天津古籍出版社 2013
18 天津檔案館, "天津商會檔案 錢業卷" 天津古籍出版社 2010
19 "國風報"
20 孔敏, "南開經濟指數資料彙編" 中国社会科学出版社 1988
21 張啓祥, "交通銀行硏究" 復旦大學 2006
22 吳必龍, "二十世紀初期天津金融風潮及其對對外貿易的影響" 1 : 1995
23 菊池貴晴, "中國近代化と社會構造: 辛亥革命の史的位置" 敎育庶嫡 1960
24 中國第二歷史檔案館, "中國舊海關史料" 京華出版社 2001
25 小瀨一, "中國における二十世紀初頭の恐慌について" 103 (103): 1990
26 閔傑, "上海橡膠風潮及其對江浙地區民族經濟的沖擊" 1 : 1989
27 沈雲龍, "『近代中國史料叢刊』 第14輯" 文海出版社 163-,
28 天津市檔案館, "『天津商會檔案彙編: 1903-1911』 全2冊" 天津人民出版社 1989
29 "『中國清代外債史資料』 1" 北京中國金融出版社 1991
30 Preston Wallace Barker, "Rubber statistics, 1900-1937: production, absorption, stocks and prices"
31 H. E. Morriss, "China Stock & Share Handbook"
32 龔關, "20世紀初天津的金融風潮及其應對機制" 2 : 2005
33 薑迎春, "1910年上海橡膠股票風潮中的外國金融勢力" 6 (6): 2008
34 郝志景, "1900-1928年天津金融風潮研究:以貨幣發行爲分析中心" 復旦大學出版社 2019
진(秦)·한초(漢初) 관수(官修) 대사기류(大事記類) 기록물(記錄物)의 서사(書寫)와 류행(流行) - 형주(荊州) 호가초장한간(胡家草場漢簡)·세기(歲紀)를 중심으로 -
악록진간(嶽麓秦簡)을 통해 본 간독(簡牘) 문서(文書)의 형태와 규격
남조(南朝)에서의 어사대(御史臺) 주탄(奏彈)에 대하여
배정유(裴庭裕)의 『東觀奏記』(中卷) 역주(譯註)와 사료적 의의
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2005-03-21 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 중국사연구외국어명 : ChungGukSa YonGu: The Journal of Chinese Historical Researches | |
2005-03-19 | 학술지명변경 | 외국어명 : CHUNGGUKSA YONGU; The Journal of Chinese -> CHUNGGUKSA YONGU; The Journal of Chinese Historical Researches | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2002-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2000-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 1.28 | 1.28 | 1.03 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.88 | 0.75 | 1.435 | 0.3 |