RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      ‘신시본풀이’로 본 고조선문화의 형성과 홍산문화

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82338657

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      『Samgukyusa』 takes note of the record of ‘Gojoseon’ dynasty not as ‘Dangun myth’ but as ‘Gojoseon nation's founding invocation’. This nation's founding invocation is composed of Hwanwoong's ‘Shinsi invocation’ and Dangun's ‘Gojoseon nation's founding invocation’. To understand the formation of Gojoseon culture, it is necessary to handle with emphasis on ‘Shinsi invocation’ which comprises the basis. A sequential observation of the world view, geographical location, ruling system, livelihood style and cultural assets depicted in Shinsi invocation reveals its close association with ‘Hongsan culture’:
      1) The world view of Shinsi, well reflected in the ideology of ‘Hongik Ingan’ i.e., ‘Wide Benefit to Human’, is a nature-friendly ideology that seeks to give benefit to human in all aspects. In view of jade container of Hongsan culture, it not only depicted various living things widely but also proclaimed commensal life ideology through embryonic cereal jade that all living things deserve respect equally.
      2) The geographic location of Shinsi boils down to Samyui Taebaek and Taebaek mountain Shindansu. Shisi was the name of a country while being the name of capital located in the mountain. Judging from the local relics of Hongsan culture, it is presumed that the location of Shinsi is the lapidary castle relic in the mountain or the Wuharyang relics that accommodates altar type stone-heaped tomb and circular altar.
      3) As for the ruling system, Shinsi ruled its people by following reasons under the administrative system of 3 executives and 5 ministers ; a highly detail-oriented and well-planned administrative system. Therefore, Wuharyang which is the central area of Hongsan culture and intensively accommodates cultural assets is assumed as the capital of Shinsi.
      4) The livelihood of Shinsi is centered around agricultural life. Judging from the identity of agricultural god, the agricultural life of the area was mostly based on dry-field farming rather than wet-field farming, and by teaching farming methods to the people, they cultivated a settlement culture. Judging from the relics of group community and the plowshare and hoe etc made of stones in Hongsan culture area, it is noted that the culture was flourishing with settlement culture and agricultural culture.
      5) The cultural assets of Shinsi involves formation of community by the altar for service to heavenly being by priest and settlement life, and belief in eternal life. While the colossal altar and stone-heaped tomb of Hongsan culture is to the ritual of service to heavenly being, the relics of community is to settlement culture, and cereal jade relics is to the belief culture of eternal life.
      The ancient record of China and the heritage of Hongsan culture testifies the reality of Shinsi, which is called ‘Gunja country’ and ‘Bulsa country’. A representative of such relics is jade container culture. Jade is gem that symbolizes the value of ‘sagacious person’, a mystical stone inspiring life to human, and pursues ‘living for eternity’. Jade culture is a representative relics that symbolizes the Shinsi culture of Hwanwoong. However, goddess temple relics was not identified with jade container but only with earthenware. This indicates that this culture is a non?main stream culture formed in an independent stream different from the main stream of Hongsan culture.
      Therefore, the goddess temple may be counted as the cultural asset of Woongnyo?bear woman from the matriarchal line that joined Shinsi's ancient country's Hongsan culture of Hwanwoong, the patriarchal line while being the main culture. Therefore, Hongsan culture area can be quoted as the central area of Gojoseon's national founding accomplished with Woongnyo's tribe while being the capital of Shinsi built up by Hwanwoong.
      번역하기

      『Samgukyusa』 takes note of the record of ‘Gojoseon’ dynasty not as ‘Dangun myth’ but as ‘Gojoseon nation's founding invocation’. This nation's founding invocation is composed of Hwanwoong's ‘Shinsi invocation’ and Dangun's ‘Gojos...

      『Samgukyusa』 takes note of the record of ‘Gojoseon’ dynasty not as ‘Dangun myth’ but as ‘Gojoseon nation's founding invocation’. This nation's founding invocation is composed of Hwanwoong's ‘Shinsi invocation’ and Dangun's ‘Gojoseon nation's founding invocation’. To understand the formation of Gojoseon culture, it is necessary to handle with emphasis on ‘Shinsi invocation’ which comprises the basis. A sequential observation of the world view, geographical location, ruling system, livelihood style and cultural assets depicted in Shinsi invocation reveals its close association with ‘Hongsan culture’:
      1) The world view of Shinsi, well reflected in the ideology of ‘Hongik Ingan’ i.e., ‘Wide Benefit to Human’, is a nature-friendly ideology that seeks to give benefit to human in all aspects. In view of jade container of Hongsan culture, it not only depicted various living things widely but also proclaimed commensal life ideology through embryonic cereal jade that all living things deserve respect equally.
      2) The geographic location of Shinsi boils down to Samyui Taebaek and Taebaek mountain Shindansu. Shisi was the name of a country while being the name of capital located in the mountain. Judging from the local relics of Hongsan culture, it is presumed that the location of Shinsi is the lapidary castle relic in the mountain or the Wuharyang relics that accommodates altar type stone-heaped tomb and circular altar.
      3) As for the ruling system, Shinsi ruled its people by following reasons under the administrative system of 3 executives and 5 ministers ; a highly detail-oriented and well-planned administrative system. Therefore, Wuharyang which is the central area of Hongsan culture and intensively accommodates cultural assets is assumed as the capital of Shinsi.
      4) The livelihood of Shinsi is centered around agricultural life. Judging from the identity of agricultural god, the agricultural life of the area was mostly based on dry-field farming rather than wet-field farming, and by teaching farming methods to the people, they cultivated a settlement culture. Judging from the relics of group community and the plowshare and hoe etc made of stones in Hongsan culture area, it is noted that the culture was flourishing with settlement culture and agricultural culture.
      5) The cultural assets of Shinsi involves formation of community by the altar for service to heavenly being by priest and settlement life, and belief in eternal life. While the colossal altar and stone-heaped tomb of Hongsan culture is to the ritual of service to heavenly being, the relics of community is to settlement culture, and cereal jade relics is to the belief culture of eternal life.
      The ancient record of China and the heritage of Hongsan culture testifies the reality of Shinsi, which is called ‘Gunja country’ and ‘Bulsa country’. A representative of such relics is jade container culture. Jade is gem that symbolizes the value of ‘sagacious person’, a mystical stone inspiring life to human, and pursues ‘living for eternity’. Jade culture is a representative relics that symbolizes the Shinsi culture of Hwanwoong. However, goddess temple relics was not identified with jade container but only with earthenware. This indicates that this culture is a non?main stream culture formed in an independent stream different from the main stream of Hongsan culture.
      Therefore, the goddess temple may be counted as the cultural asset of Woongnyo?bear woman from the matriarchal line that joined Shinsi's ancient country's Hongsan culture of Hwanwoong, the patriarchal line while being the main culture. Therefore, Hongsan culture area can be quoted as the central area of Gojoseon's national founding accomplished with Woongnyo's tribe while being the capital of Shinsi built up by Hwanwoong.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Ⅰ. 고조선 ‘사료’의 신화적 인식 극복
      • Ⅱ. 신시본풀이로 본 ‘신시문화’의 정체성과 홍산문화
      • Ⅲ. 신시고국의 문화적 정체성과 홍산문화의 친연성
      • Ⅳ. 신시고국의 홍산문화에서 이룩한 고조선문화
      • 〈참고문헌〉
      • Ⅰ. 고조선 ‘사료’의 신화적 인식 극복
      • Ⅱ. 신시본풀이로 본 ‘신시문화’의 정체성과 홍산문화
      • Ⅲ. 신시고국의 문화적 정체성과 홍산문화의 친연성
      • Ⅳ. 신시고국의 홍산문화에서 이룩한 고조선문화
      • 〈참고문헌〉
      • 〈abstract〉

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 崔南善, "「檀君神典의 古意」, 東亞日報, 1928년 1월 1일~2월 28일"

      2 崔南善, "六堂崔南善全集 2" 玄岩社 1997

      3 遼寧省文物考古硏究所, "遼寧牛河梁紅山文化“女神廟”與積石冢群發掘簡報" 8 : 1986

      4 許玉林, "遼寧東溝縣后洼遺址發掘槪要" 12 : 1989

      5 遼寧省博物館, "遼河文明展"

      6 "論語"

      7 임재해, "한국신화의 주체적 인식과 민족문화의 정체성 In: 한국신화의 정체성을 밝힌다" 지식산업사 2008

      8 윤내현, "한국 열국사 연구" 지식산업사 1998

      9 박선희, "한국 고대 복식—그 원형과 정체" 지식산업사 2002

      10 한스—요아힘 파프로트, "퉁구스족의 곰의례" 태학사 2007

      1 崔南善, "「檀君神典의 古意」, 東亞日報, 1928년 1월 1일~2월 28일"

      2 崔南善, "六堂崔南善全集 2" 玄岩社 1997

      3 遼寧省文物考古硏究所, "遼寧牛河梁紅山文化“女神廟”與積石冢群發掘簡報" 8 : 1986

      4 許玉林, "遼寧東溝縣后洼遺址發掘槪要" 12 : 1989

      5 遼寧省博物館, "遼河文明展"

      6 "論語"

      7 임재해, "한국신화의 주체적 인식과 민족문화의 정체성 In: 한국신화의 정체성을 밝힌다" 지식산업사 2008

      8 윤내현, "한국 열국사 연구" 지식산업사 1998

      9 박선희, "한국 고대 복식—그 원형과 정체" 지식산업사 2002

      10 한스—요아힘 파프로트, "퉁구스족의 곰의례" 태학사 2007

      11 이형구, "진주 대평리 옥방5지구 선사유적" 선문대학교박물관 2001

      12 조희승, "조선의 비단과 비단길" 사회과학출판사 2001

      13 박선희, "유물자료로 본 고조선 이전 시기의 복식문화 수준" 단군학회 19 : 73-120, 2008

      14 윤내현, "우리 고대사 상상에서 현실로" 지식산업사 2003

      15 우실하, "요하문명과 동북아시아 상고사" 단국대 북방문화연구소 2008

      16 임재해, "신라 금관의 기원을 밝힌다" 지식산업사 2008

      17 이희진, "식민사학과 한국고대사" 소나무 2008

      18 이형구, "발해연안에서 찾은 한국 고대문화의 비밀" 김영사 2004

      19 이정훈, "발로 쓴 反동북공정" 지식산업사 2009

      20 우실하, "동붕공정 너머 요하문명론" 소나무 2007

      21 궈다순, "동북문화와 유연문명 상" 동북아역사 재단 2008

      22 임재해, "단군신화에 갈무리된 문화적 원형과 민족문화의 정체성" 단군학회 16 (16): 275-350, 2007

      23 임재해, "단군신화를 보는 생태학적인 눈과 자연친화적 홍익인간 사상" 단군학회 9 : 115-158, 2003

      24 임재해, "단군신화로 본 고조선 문화의 기원 재인식" 단군학회 19 : 277-372, 2008

      25 임재해, "꼭두각시놀음의 역사적 전개와 발전양상" 한국구비문학회 1998

      26 윤내현, "고조선 연구" 一志社 1994

      27 신용하, "고조선 국가의 형성 - 3부족 결합에 의한 고조선 개국과 아사달 -" 한국사회사학회 (80) : 5-69, 2008

      28 국립문화재연구소, "고성군 문암리 선사유적 발굴설명회 자료"

      29 임재해, "고대에도 한류가 있었다—민족문화의 정체성 재인식 In: 고대에도한류가 있었다" 지식산업사 2007

      30 "魏書"

      31 愼鏞廈, "韓國 原民族 形成과 歷史的 傳統" 나남출판 2005

      32 "通典"

      33 "說文解字"

      34 魏運亨, "紅山文化遺址又發現五千年前金字塔式巨型建築 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      35 王曾, "紅山文化的走向 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      36 李宇峰, "紅山文化發現的石農具 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      37 李宇峰, "紅山文化發現的石農具 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      38 李恭篤, "紅山文化玉雕藝述初析 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      39 孫守道, "紅山文化玉器新品新鑒" 吉林文史出版社 2007

      40 載煒, "眞賞紅山" 內蒙古人民出版社 2007

      41 孫守道, "牛河梁與紅山文化(提要) In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      42 孫守道, "牛河梁紅山文化女神頭像的發現與硏究" (8) : 1986

      43 卜 工, "牛河梁祭祀遺址及其相關問題 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      44 "漢書"

      45 愼鏞廈, "民族形成의 理論" 한국사회학회 7 : 1984

      46 愼鏞廈, "檀君說話의 사회학적 해석 in: 설화와 의식의 사회사" 문학과지성사 1995

      47 金載元, "檀君神話의 新硏究" 探究堂 1947

      48 "新唐書"

      49 "應製詩註"

      50 "後漢書"

      51 "帝王韻紀"

      52 李康植, "天符經 의 組織論的 解釋 下 In: 한배달 5" 1989

      53 李康植,"‘古記, "古記’」에 기록된 神市組織의 構造와 機能" 경북대학교 경상대학 15 : 1987

      54 尹乃鉉, "人類社會 進化上司의 古朝鮮 位置" 檀國大史學會學 26 : 1993

      55 李康植, "主穀・主命・主病・主刑・主善惡이 名詞로서 官名 내지 組織名이며 5事組織이라는 辨證" 경주대학교 1991

      56 "世宗實錄 地理志"

      57 "三國遺事"

      58 陸思賢, "“勾云形玉佩”的形狀結構及愚意的思想內容 In: 中國考古集成 東北卷" 北京出版社 1997

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-02-18 학회명변경 한글명 : 단군학회 -> 고조선단군학회
      영문명 : Dangun Studies Association -> Gojoseon & Dangun Studies Association
      KCI등재
      2021-02-18 학술지명변경 한글명 : 단군학연구 -> 고조선단군학
      외국어명 : Journal of Dangun Studies -> The Journal of Gojoseon & Dangun Studies
      KCI등재
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-04-03 학술지명변경 한글명 : 고조선단군학 -> 단군학연구
      외국어명 : The Journal of Gojoseon & Dangun Studies -> Journal of Dangun Studies
      KCI등재
      2017-06-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 고조선단군학회 -> 단군학회
      영문명 : Gojoseon & Dangun Studies Association -> Dangun Studies Association
      KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재후보
      2015-12-01 평가 등재후보로 하락 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-04-11 학회명변경 한글명 : 단군학회 -> 고조선단군학회
      영문명 : 미등록 -> Gojoseon & Dangun Studies Association
      KCI등재
      2011-04-11 학술지명변경 한글명 : 단군학연구 -> 고조선단군학
      외국어명 : Journal of Dangun Studies -> The Journal of Gojoseon & Dangun Studies
      KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보2차) KCI등재후보
      2005-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.29 0.29 0.29
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.31 0.33 0.741 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼