한국의 對말레이시아 경제협력전략에 관한 연구

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Korea's degree of dependence upon foreign trade is up to 98%, which ranks the most among the G20 countries. High degree of dependency does not necessarily mean a drawback, but it increases vulnerability to external economic shocks. In order to rectify this high degree of dependency, the best solution is to switch the GDP policy to a GNP growth policy. In this new policy, Korea needs to find a strategic economic partner and seek an economic co-operation.
The world economy in the WTO system is based on limitless competition. As a result, economic integration has been promoted among regions, continents, and moreover among religious affiliations. This form of economic blocs raise the barrier against the non-members, which pushes Korea to find a detour. In order to counter this crises, Korea has accelerated on seeking an alternatives such as promoting Foreign Direct Investment(FDI), spurring the development of new technology, and securing new markets. After a careful examination, Indonesia has been selected as our main target for cooperation, who is the leader of ASEAN and the center for Islam culture and economics in Asia. Malaysia has a great growth potential as a center and hub for transportation and distribution, and Korea can benefit from the abundant resources and low labor costs of Malaysia.
Results of SWOT analysis show that the goal of Malaysia, which carries the banner of "Vision 2020," is to reach GDP per capita of fifteen thousand dollars through various processes; Green Industry, Enlarging the knowledge-based infrastructure, Development of Technology, and Development of Finances.
The Vision 2020 plan of Malaysia provides Korea with a great advantage and competitiveness over other countries. This is because Korea has a deep knowledge and experience on building knowledge-based infrastructure and a higher value-added business. Korea also have a high level of education and human resources as well as high-technology level in manufacturing area. Korea's metalwares, machinery, equipments, electronics, car industries have a great degree of competitiveness.
If Korea can transfer the experiences and technologies to Malaysia, it will be beneficial for the Malaysian government in prosecuting industry diversification from labor-intensive industry and natural resource based industry; and as a result, the outcome of economic cooperation will be a great success for both countries.
We can take an advantage of the excellent transportation and distribution infrastructure of Malaysian ports. Since our economy highly depends on exports and trade, retaining an outpost in the region can improve our trade effectiveness. This not only means that we are advancing to the Malaysian market, but also means that we can use Malaysia as a bridgehead for advancing into the southern Asian markets and also into the Islamic countries in the region. If we can build a positive connection with the Malaysian counterparts, who have a great influence in the area like ASEAN, and also in the Asian Islam affiliations, it will help us to advance further into the area.
But in order to utilize these opportunities, Korea needs to overcome the fact that Malaysia is one of the big centers for Islamic culture. Malaysia does guarantee freedom of religion, but Islam rules over the society and economic systems of Malaysia. 12% of the total financial assets are Islamic, and the government is planing to promote the rate up to 20%. And the finance and communication industries, which are the two main driving forces of Malaysia economic growth, have a monopoly structure.
This means that the companies who are planning to make business in this country ought to understand and also promote cultural exchange with the local people and companies. They would also have to learn the mechanisms of Islamic finances, and also enhance the relationship between the Islamic groups who control the grounds of these specific industries.
In addition, supporting the future industry of Malaysia is another desirable solution. One of the starting point could be concentrating on the energy issue, for example nuclear power or new regeneration energy areas. We can provide the technological support and also training opportunities in these areas.
This concludes that the cardinal direction for promoting economic cooperation with Malaysia is to comprehensively support the three main economic development strategy of Malaysian government : promoting Green Industry, knowledge-based infrastructure and Technology.
Our strong points, such as great knowledge and experience in IT and high-technology industries, and also a friendly attitude towards their culture and people will help us to promote economic cooperations between the two countries. Moreover, the support of our government in advancing to these markets will further enhance the possibility of our success in building a mutual confidence. The Korean government should devise a program that can promote our country images. This can be achieved by providing educational support, such as building education facilities or making educational contents. It can also promote the image through providing student exchange programs as well as scholar interchanges.
Only a sufficient and precise understanding of the Malaysian market as well as the people can minimize the adverse effects and lower the possibilities of misunderstandings. We also have to consider that we could have to modify various laws and regulations in order to meet the needs of the both sides and come into a successful negotiations. And we must remember that cooperation can only be reached by sincere efforts and thorough research and examinations.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 제 1장 서론 1
• 제 1절 문제제기 및 연구배경과 연구목적 1
• 1. 문제제기 1
• 2. 연구배경과 연구목적 5
• 제 2절 연구범위와 연구내용 및 연구방법 11
• 1. 연구범위와 연구내용 11
• 2. 연구방법 15
• 제 3절 선행연구와 차별성 18
• 제 2장 경제협력에 관한 이론적 접근 22
• 제 1절 해외직접투자의 본질 22
• 1. 해외직접투자의 정의 22
• 2. 해외직접투자의 기존 정의에 대한 반론 24
• 3. 해외직접투자 유형 27
• 4. 해외직접투자 경제적 효과 32
• 제 2절 신흥개도국의 해외직접투자 현황 41
• 1. 해외직접투자 변화 추세와 배경 41
• 2. 투자국과 피투자국의 해외직접투자 정책 변화 44
• 3. 말레이시아 해외직접투자 유치 동향 47
• 제 3절 해외직접투자의 주요이론 52
• 1. 해외직접투자의 이론의 태동과 발전과정 52
• 2. 해외직접투자 이론 53
• 가. 독점적 우위이론(monopolistic advantage theory) 55
• 나. 내부화 이론 64
• 다. 절충 이론 67
• 제 4절 신흥개도국형의 新해외직접투자이론 71
• 1. 더닝(Dunning)의 투자발전 단계설 74
• 2. 기디(Giddy)와 영(Young)의 기존이론 수정 적용 75
• 3. 레크로우(Lecraw)의 제품수명 주기 이론 연장 적용 76
• 4. 웰즈(Wells)의 기술 갭(Gap)모델 이론 77
• 5. 고지마(Kojima)와 오자와(Ozawa)의 거시경제적 이론 접근 78
• 제 3장 말레이시아 경제적 환경 분석 81
• 제 1절 경제협력 필요성 및 기대효과 81
• 1. 경제협력의 필요성 81
• 2. 경제협력의 기대효과 83
• 제 2절 말레이시아 주요산업 동향 85
• 1. 산업구조와 주요산업 동향 85
• 2. 금융산업 동향 86
• 3. IT산업 동향 97
• 4. 자동차산업 동향 110
• 5. 관광산업 동향 128
• 6. 말레이시아 석유가스산업 동향 170
• 7. 방송산업 동향 176
• 제 3절 말레이시아 주요 경제의 투자환경 분석 192
• 1. 말레이시아 일반 투자 환경 분석 192
• 2. 말레이시아 산업별 투자 환경 분석 197
• 3. 말레이시아 통상측면 투자 환경 분석 203
• 제 4절 말레이시아 FTA 추진 정책 및 현황 215
• 1. FTA에 추진 정책 215
• 2. ASEAN의 FTA 추진 현황 216
• 3. 말레이시아 FTA 추진 현황 220
• 4. 한국-말레이시아 FTA 추진 현황 224
• 제 4장 한국-말레이시아 무역경쟁력분석 228
• 제 1절 현시 비교 및 시장별 비교지수 228
• 1. 현시비교우위지수 228
• 2. 시장별 비교우위지수 230
• 제 2절 무역특화지수 및 동태분석 233
• 1. 무역특화지수 233
• 2. 무역특화지수의 동태변화분석 236
• 제 5장 한국의 對말레이시아 경제협력전략 242
• 제 1절 전반적인 경제협력전략 도출 242
• 1. EFE Matrix 242
• 2. IFE Matrix 245
• 3. SWOT 분석 247
• 제 2절 에너지산업에서의 협력전략 251
• 1. 말레이시아의 전력 및 원전분야 외부환경평가(EFE Matrix) 251
• 2. 말레이시아의 전력 및 원전분야 내부환경평가(IFE Matrix) 253
• 3. SWOT 분석 254
• 제 3절 주요 산업에서의 협력전략 : 금융산업, 수송 인프라, 통신산업 258
• 1. 말레이시아 주요산업(인프라, 정보통신) 분야의 외부환경평가 (EFE Matrix) 258
• 2. 말레이시아 주요산업(인프라, 정보통신) 분야의 내부환경평가(EFE Matrix) 260
• 3. SWOT 분석 262
• 제 6장 결론 266
• 참고문헌 275
• Abstract 288