RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      Traditional face to face and web‐based tutorials: a study of university students’ perception blended mode learning

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101613735

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study reports the results of a survey on the needs and attitudes of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners towards blended learning (an on-line course combined with off-line lecture classes) for an on-line general English course at the univ...

      This study reports the results of a survey on the needs and attitudes of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners towards blended learning (an on-line course combined with off-line lecture classes) for an on-line general English course at the university level. Blended mode (Graham, 2006; Singh & Reed, 2001) is a growing field as an alternative to on-line or off-line only programs in language learning and teaching (Mantyla, 2001; Bersin, 2004). A survey was conducted with 33 off-line and 51 on-line university students, aiming to find useful information for developing distinctive blended learning models, one for on-line and the other for off-line environments. The findings are as follows: the two groups were similar in that i) distraction was thought of as the biggest disadvantage of on-line classes, ii) more than 42% of the students wanted to include some sort of off-line lecture combined with on-line contents, iii) about 60% of the students were willing to attend off-line lectures while taking an on-line course, and iv) the most preferred type of off-line class was such that the class meet biweekly for about two hours each time for team projects or assignment presentations and Q&A. Differences were also found: i) off-line students preferred off-line classes to on-line classes for general English courses (72% vs. 21%) whereas on-line students did not show such a preference (50% vs. 50%), ii) off-line students practically expected to attend off-line class more frequently than on-line students, and iii) on-line students showed a slight tendency to prefer Korean‐American teachers and English native speakers to Korean teachers whereas off-line students did not show such a preference tendency.
      The results provide positive evidence for university students’needs as well as useful information for implementing distinctive blended mode in EFL courses for on-line and off-line university students.

      더보기

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study reports the results of a survey on the needs and attitudes of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners towards blended learning (an on-line course combined with off-line lecture classes) for an on-line general English course at the univ...

      This study reports the results of a survey on the needs and attitudes of English as a foreign language (EFL) learners towards blended learning (an on-line course combined with off-line lecture classes) for an on-line general English course at the university level. Blended mode (Graham, 2006; Singh & Reed, 2001) is a growing field as an alternative to on-line or off-line only programs in language learning and teaching (Mantyla, 2001; Bersin, 2004). A survey was conducted with 33 off-line and 51 on-line university students, aiming to find useful information for developing distinctive blended learning models, one for on-line and the other for off-line environments. The findings are as follows: the two groups were similar in that i) distraction was thought of as the biggest disadvantage of on-line classes, ii) more than 42% of the students wanted to include some sort of off-line lecture combined with on-line contents, iii) about 60% of the students were willing to attend off-line lectures while taking an on-line course, and iv) the most preferred type of off-line class was such that the class meet biweekly for about two hours each time for team projects or assignment presentations and Q&A. Differences were also found: i) off-line students preferred off-line classes to on-line classes for general English courses (72% vs. 21%) whereas on-line students did not show such a preference (50% vs. 50%), ii) off-line students practically expected to attend off-line class more frequently than on-line students, and iii) on-line students showed a slight tendency to prefer Korean‐American teachers and English native speakers to Korean teachers whereas off-line students did not show such a preference tendency.
      The results provide positive evidence for university students’needs as well as useful information for implementing distinctive blended mode in EFL courses for on-line and off-line university students.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Go, Y. J., "The effects of Blended e-Learning Programs on English speaking proficiency" Korea National Education University 2008

      2 Cho, I. H., "The blended learning strategies and ROL" Credu 2003

      3 Bersin, J., "The blended learning book" Pfeiffer 2004

      4 Graham, C. R., "Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. in: Handbook of blended learning" Pfeiffer 2006

      5 Osguthorpe, R, T., "Blended learning environments" 4 (4): 227-233, 2003

      6 Lee, H., "Blended e‐learning strategies for effective teaching in traditional universities" 2005

      7 Mantyla, K., "Blended Learning: The power is in the mix. in: American Society for Training & Development" ASTD 2001

      8 Singh, H., "A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. in: American Society for Training & Development (ASTD) Sate of the Industry Report" 2001

      1 Go, Y. J., "The effects of Blended e-Learning Programs on English speaking proficiency" Korea National Education University 2008

      2 Cho, I. H., "The blended learning strategies and ROL" Credu 2003

      3 Bersin, J., "The blended learning book" Pfeiffer 2004

      4 Graham, C. R., "Blended learning systems: definition, current trends, and future directions. in: Handbook of blended learning" Pfeiffer 2006

      5 Osguthorpe, R, T., "Blended learning environments" 4 (4): 227-233, 2003

      6 Lee, H., "Blended e‐learning strategies for effective teaching in traditional universities" 2005

      7 Mantyla, K., "Blended Learning: The power is in the mix. in: American Society for Training & Development" ASTD 2001

      8 Singh, H., "A white paper: Achieving success with blended learning. in: American Society for Training & Development (ASTD) Sate of the Industry Report" 2001

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-04-22 학회명변경 영문명 : FOREIGN STUDIES CENTER -> FOREIGN STUDIES INSTITUTE KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      2007-09-03 학회명변경 한글명 : 외국어문학연구소 -> 외국학연구소
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.28 0.28 0.25
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.22 0.2 0.437 0.12
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼