대표관료제에 대한 담론 고찰: Q-방법론을 중심으로 = Discourse Analysis of Bureaucratic Representation: A Q-Methodology Approach

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

In this study, a Q-method analysis was employed to scrutinize the operant subjectivity regarding representative bureaucracy among a cohort comprising academic experts and professionals across multiple tiers of government and public institutions. The analysis brought to light four distinct patterns, each representing a discrete set of attitudes and perceptions.
The theoretical implications call for a reexamination of representative bureaucracy as a multifaceted and evolving construct, and calling for the development of theories that are adaptive, context-sensitive, and mindful of unintended consequences. In terms of practical implications, the findings provide insights for policymakers and public administrators, illuminating the complexities involved in formulating representative bureaucracy policies that are both comprehensive and responsive to the concerns of a diverse array of stakeholders.
This research contributes to the literature on representative bureaucracy by elucidating the heterogeneous attitudes and perceptions among key stakeholders, and by highlighting the need for policies that are grounded in a nuanced understanding of the dynamic interplay between representation, adaptability, and policy outcomes.