Many Chinese scholars have debated on the ‘在``(be) in Chinese language, because it can be analyzed as a various kind of syntactic category. They classify the word ‘在`` as a verb in the structure like [‘在``+ NP] in sentence final, a preposi...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A101833152
2016
Korean
범주문법 ; Categorial Grammar ; 범주 ; Category ; 문법적 기능 ; Grammatical Function ; 함수자 ; Functor ; 논항 ; Argument. 계사 ; Copula
KCI등재
학술저널
113-130(18쪽)
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Many Chinese scholars have debated on the ‘在``(be) in Chinese language, because it can be analyzed as a various kind of syntactic category. They classify the word ‘在`` as a verb in the structure like [‘在``+ NP] in sentence final, a preposi...
Many Chinese scholars have debated on the ‘在``(be) in Chinese language, because it can be analyzed as a various kind of syntactic category. They classify the word ‘在`` as a verb in the structure like [‘在``+ NP] in sentence final, a preposition or serial verb in [‘在`` + NP + VP] structure, and a aspectual auxiliary verb in [‘在``+ VP] structure. That is, they tried to describe the meaning of the word based on the different kind of the category. However, they disregard the grammatical functions of the word. In this respect, we could treat the word as a functional relation such as functor-argument in the model of categorial grammar. We argued that ‘在`` in [‘在`` + NP] or [‘在`` + NP + VP] structure is a preposition, but the prepositional phrase works as a predicate of subject or an adjunct of the sentence. We also proved that the ‘在`` in [‘在`` + NP + VP] would be a sentential adverb or a predicate adverb depending on the meaning of NP in this structure. Especially the word ‘在`` in [‘在`` + NP + VP] was classified as a preposition or a serial verb, but we also proved that it works as a sentential adverb or a predicate adverb, that is, it is not a serial verb, but a preposition phrase. Finally we gave a formal representation of ‘在`` in [‘在`` + VP] as the aspectual auxiliary in the functor-argument relation.
On the Role of Indirect Personal Reference in the Development of Personal Pronouns
Young Korean Learners` Usage of the Verb give: Evidence from Their Narratives
A Corpus-based Analysis of Chinese EFL Learners` Use of Linking Adverbials
영화를 활용한 명시적 영어 거절 화행 학습에 대한 연구