Basically Poststructuralist in approaches, this article attempts to explore Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter (1850) in terms of feminist and deconstructionist literary analysis. This article tries to counter the argument that Hawthorne's use o...
Basically Poststructuralist in approaches, this article attempts to explore Nathaniel Hawthorne's The Scarlet Letter (1850) in terms of feminist and deconstructionist literary analysis. This article tries to counter the argument that Hawthorne's use of the feminine was always in the service of masculinity issues. It argues that virtually alone among male writers in the nineteen century America, Hawthorne made space for feminist analysis in this work. Among some feminist issues he deals with in the book are the subversion of the Puritan patriarchical society, challenges to the age-old male chauvinism, women's equality with men, their freedom to choose to marry or not, and their rights to rear their own children. Hester succeeds not only as a single mother supporting herself and her child, but also as one of the first female counsellors who help their fellow females in distress. This article further argues that The Scarlet Letter treats itself with what deconstructionists call the free play of language. In the romance, the relationship between signified and signifer turns out to be unstable and problematic. By undermining the stability of the system of signs, the author subverts the values of the Puritan theocracy.