RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      How value co-creation in social platforms leads to participating companies’ competitive advantage and performance = 소셜플랫폼에서의 가치공동창조가 참여기업의 경쟁우위와 성과에 미치는 영향

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T14755745

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This research aimed at studying how much influence long-term performance will receive from the relationship between value co-production of value co-creation activity, value-in-use and sustainable competitive advantage. This research selected knowledge sharing, equity and interaction as sub-variables of value co-creation in order to identify value co-creation activity and long-term performance in a marketing that is implemented by using social platform. Autonomy, competence and relationship were used as sub-elements of value-in-use, and differentiation advantage and cost advantage were selected to evaluate sustainable competitive advantage. The relationship with long-term performance was studied.
      This study found that value co-production had influence on value-in-use, and value-in-use had positive influence on sustainable competitive advantage. Furthermore, sustainable competitive advantage showed having an integrated relationship to elicit long-term performance. Therefore this study implies that value co-creation activities could bring long-term performance through acquisition of sustainable competitive advantage theoretically and practically.
      As an initial study about value co-creation activity in social platform environment, this study aimed at exploring the relationship between several variables relating to value co-creation by company and customer. However lots of limitations existed because the previous works considering online environment were actually scarce. Therefore, in further study, each variable representing distinctiveness of social platform needs to be refined and studied. This research studied on value co-production, which is value co-creation activity for B2B (Business-to-Business) based marketing utilizing Facebook, Instagram, Kakao Story, Twitter and Blog, value-in-use and sustainable competitive advantage.
      번역하기

      This research aimed at studying how much influence long-term performance will receive from the relationship between value co-production of value co-creation activity, value-in-use and sustainable competitive advantage. This research selected knowledge...

      This research aimed at studying how much influence long-term performance will receive from the relationship between value co-production of value co-creation activity, value-in-use and sustainable competitive advantage. This research selected knowledge sharing, equity and interaction as sub-variables of value co-creation in order to identify value co-creation activity and long-term performance in a marketing that is implemented by using social platform. Autonomy, competence and relationship were used as sub-elements of value-in-use, and differentiation advantage and cost advantage were selected to evaluate sustainable competitive advantage. The relationship with long-term performance was studied.
      This study found that value co-production had influence on value-in-use, and value-in-use had positive influence on sustainable competitive advantage. Furthermore, sustainable competitive advantage showed having an integrated relationship to elicit long-term performance. Therefore this study implies that value co-creation activities could bring long-term performance through acquisition of sustainable competitive advantage theoretically and practically.
      As an initial study about value co-creation activity in social platform environment, this study aimed at exploring the relationship between several variables relating to value co-creation by company and customer. However lots of limitations existed because the previous works considering online environment were actually scarce. Therefore, in further study, each variable representing distinctiveness of social platform needs to be refined and studied. This research studied on value co-production, which is value co-creation activity for B2B (Business-to-Business) based marketing utilizing Facebook, Instagram, Kakao Story, Twitter and Blog, value-in-use and sustainable competitive advantage.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • Table of Contents
      • ChapterⅠ. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------09
      • 1. Background -----------------------------------------------------------------------09
      • 2. Research Purposes ------------------------------------------------------------------17
      • Table of Contents
      • ChapterⅠ. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------09
      • 1. Background -----------------------------------------------------------------------09
      • 2. Research Purposes ------------------------------------------------------------------17
      • Chapter Ⅱ. LITERATURE REVIEW ---------------------------------------23
      • 1. Service Dominant Logic ---------------------------------------------------------25
      • 2. value co-creation ------------------------------------------------------------------27
      • 2.1 value co-production ----------------------------------------------------------32
      • 2.1.1 Knowledge Sharing ------------------------------------------------32
      • 2.1.2 Equity ----------------------------------------------------------------33
      • 2.1.3 Interaction -----------------------------------------------------------35
      • 2.2 value-in-use ---------------------------------------------------------------36
      • 2.2.1 Autonomy -----------------------------------------------------------37
      • 2.2.2 Competence ---------------------------------------------------------37
      • 2.2.3 Relationship ---------------------------------------------------------38
      • 3. Sustainable Competitive Advantage --------------------------------------------39
      • 3.1 Differentiation Advantage ------------------------------------------------42
      • 3.2 Cost Advantage ---------------------------------------------------------------44
      • 4. Long-term Performance ----------------------------------------------------------45
      • 5. Type of Service -------------------------------------------------------------------46
      • Chapter Ⅲ. RESEARCH METHOD -----------------------------------------48
      • 1. Research Model -------------------------------------------------------------------48
      • 2. Research Hypotheses -------------------------------------------------------------50
      • 2.1 Relationship between value co-production and value-in-use ----------50
      • 2.2 Relationship between value-in-use and sustainable competitive advantage ----------------------------------------------------------------------53
      • 2.3 Relationship between differentiation advantage and long-term performance -------------------------------------------------------------------55
      • 2.4 Relationship between cost advantage and long-term performance ----56
      • 2.5 Relationship with hypotheses in which service type is suggested -----57
      • 3. Measurements ---------------------------------------------------------------------58
      • 3.1 Value co-production ----------------------------------------------------------58
      • 3.2 Value-in-use -----------------------------------------------------------------60
      • 3.3 Sustainable Competitive Advantage ---------------------------------------62
      • 3.4 Long-term Performance -----------------------------------------------------63
      • 4. Data Collection and Analysis ----------------------------------------------------64
      • Chapter Ⅳ. RESULTS -----------------------------------------------------------67
      • 1. Characteristics of Samples -------------------------------------------------------67
      • 2. Validity and Reliability -----------------------------------------------------------69
      • 2.1 Confirmatory Factor Analysis ----------------------------------------------69
      • 2.2 Reliability and Validity Analysis -------------------------------------------69
      • 3. Hypothesis Testing ----------------------------------------------------------------72
      • 4. Multigroup Analysis --------------------------------------------------------------76
      • Chapter Ⅴ. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION -----------------------81
      • 1. Summary of Research Results ---------------------------------------------------81
      • 2. Implications ------------------------------------------------------------------------83
      • 2.1 Theoretical Implications -----------------------------------------------------83
      • 2.2 Practical Implications --------------------------------------------------------84
      • 3. Limitations and Future Research ------------------------------------------------88
      • 3.1 Limitations --------------------------------------------------------------------88
      • 3.2 Future Research --------------------------------------------------------------89
      • Reference -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------90
      • Abstract (English) --------------------------------------------------------------------------102
      • Abstract (Korean) --------------------------------------------------------------------------104
      • Appendix 1. Indirect effect test ----------------------------------------------------------106
      • Appendix 2. English Questionnaire -----------------------------------------------------108
      • Appendix 3: Korean Questionnaire ------------------------------------------------------118
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼