关于审查批捕程序律师介入机制的思考

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

As the most severe compulsory measures stipulated in China’s criminal procedure law, arrest’s effect mainly displays in totally depriving of suspected criminal citizens’ personal freedom and rights and making them in state of custody and waiting for the judge’s judgment in pretrial procedure. In order to solve the long existing overdue custody problem resulting from the high rate of custody in judicial practice, the revised “criminal procedural law” in 2012 treats the examining and approving an arrest cautiously and clearly specified the system of interventioning by lawyer in examining and approving an arrest. This article attempts to briefly discussed the legislation operation problem.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 中文要約
• Ⅰ. ??的提出
• Ⅱ. ?于律?介入??批捕程序的域外考察
• Ⅲ. ?策?完善
• Ⅳ. ??
• 【?考文?】
• Abstract

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 马相哲译, "韩国刑事诉讼法" 中国政法大学出版社 2004

2 ]卡斯东, "罗结珍译：《法国刑事诉讼 法精义》下册" 中国政法大学出版社 1999

3 陈瑞华, "比较刑事诉讼法" 中国人民大学出版社 2010

4 孙长永, "探索正当程序——比较刑事诉讼法专论" 中国法制出版社 2005

5 房国宾, "审前羁押与保释" 法律出版社 2011

6 "北京市海淀区人民检察院于2008年6月1日制订出台了《律师介入审查批捕程序办法（试行）》；另外，2009年江苏省太仓市司法局与检察院共同出台《关于律师介入审查批捕的规定》；2011年四川省资阳市雁江区检察院与雁江区司法局联合也出台了《审查逮捕听取律师意见程序办法》。这些办法的出台是对审查批捕程序律师介入制度的有益探索，在司法实践中取得了较好的效果"

7 叶青, "关于羁押性强制措施适用的公开听证程序研究" 4 : 2002

8 陈永生, "侦查程序原理论" 中国人民公安大学出版社 2003