Ham, Seok-heon wrote a series of articles titled 『The History of Joseon(Korea) from the viewpoint of the Bible』 at 『Bible Joseon』 23 times from 1934 to 1935. This study is to discuss his writings from the perspective of Korean historiography o...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A82494123
2010
-
함석헌 ; 1930년대 한국사학 ; 『聖書旳 ; 立場에서 본 朝鮮歷史』 ; 苦難史觀 ; 종말사관 ; 기독교사관 ; 관념론적 역사인식 ; 반식민사학 ; 무교회사상 ; 조선성서연구회 ; 김교신 ; Ham ; Seok-Heon ; Korean histography of the 1930s ; 『The History of Joseon(Korea) from the viewpoint of the Bible』 ; the history of suffering ; the history of apocalypse ; the history of Christianity ; idealistic conception on history ; anti-colonial historiography ; the nonchurch movement ; Bible Joseon Reaserch Society ; Kim ; Kyo-Shin
900
KCI등재
학술저널
101-140(40쪽)
3
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Ham, Seok-heon wrote a series of articles titled 『The History of Joseon(Korea) from the viewpoint of the Bible』 at 『Bible Joseon』 23 times from 1934 to 1935. This study is to discuss his writings from the perspective of Korean historiography o...
Ham, Seok-heon wrote a series of articles titled 『The History of Joseon(Korea) from the viewpoint of the Bible』 at 『Bible Joseon』 23 times from 1934 to 1935. This study is to discuss his writings from the perspective of Korean historiography of the 1930s. It is meaningless to discuss whether he is a historian. That is because he narrated Korean history from his unique view and published his thought through many types of publication. His conscience would have not allowed him to ignore the reality of Korea under the Japanese imperial occupation. However, there were difficulties in his times to directly describe what he really thought. In this regard, his views on the histories of Christianity, Religious, providence, apocalypse, suffering, morality and so on would be one outlet for him to describe the history of Korea indirectly. His view on the history of suffering is not confined to the religious perspective and meaning. It is appropriate to recognize it as a way through which Korean people can reflect on their reality under the Japanese occupation, overcome those memories and ultimately revitalize Korean history again. His historical description and perception was structured through idealistic spiritualism which was very similar to those of nationalistic historians. Meanwhile, he not only strongly rejected the colonial view of history but also denounced historical materialism and some nationalistic historiography such as the heroic view of history and the cultural historiography. However, the main concept of his historical view was nationalism. The spirit of Korean people which he emphasized as the main pillar of our history shared the similar idea with the idealistic view supported by some nationalistic historians. Rather, his idea had much more nationalistic characteristics than their ones. What he sincerely pursued was the history of Korean people. In this regard, he thought that the value of a historian rest not on recording facts accurately, but on his judgement and interpretation of historical facts. However, his publications were not organised well as full-scale historic writings. In addition, those publications are shunned by the academic community. There were few people who read his writings. His way of narrating the history is not systematic and his theory is rough and not sophisticated. So it is quite understandable that there are many who are skeptical about the effects of his 『Bible Joseon』 on his times. However, after Korea was liberalized, 『Bible Joseon』 started being published several times and its value was recognized again. This is why 『Bible Joseon』 should be evaluated as a historic publication which has a unique position in the history of historiography of Korea.
목차 (Table of Contents)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 김기승, "함석헌의 한국사 인식" 함석헌기념사업회 (188) : 2006
2 지명관, "함석헌의 조선사관에 대한 고찰 -藤井武의 일본사관과의 비교를 중심으로-" 154 (154): 2000
3 盧明植, "함석헌" 일조각 26 : 2000
4 盧明植, "토인비와 咸錫憲의 比較試論-苦難史觀을 중심으로-" 숭실대학교 한국기독교문화연구소 3 : 1985
5 장규식, "일제하 한국 기독교 민족주의 연구" 혜안 2001
6 방기중, "백남운의 역사이론과 한국사인식" (여름) : 1990
7 함석헌, "뜻으로 본 한국역사" 한길사 2003
8 李基白, "나의 한국사 연구" 韓國史學史學報 2000
9 양현혜, "김교신, 함석헌 그리고 우찌무라 간죠(內村鑑三)" 한국교회사학회 (18) : 67-95, 2006
10 박걸순, "국학운동"
1 김기승, "함석헌의 한국사 인식" 함석헌기념사업회 (188) : 2006
2 지명관, "함석헌의 조선사관에 대한 고찰 -藤井武의 일본사관과의 비교를 중심으로-" 154 (154): 2000
3 盧明植, "함석헌" 일조각 26 : 2000
4 盧明植, "토인비와 咸錫憲의 比較試論-苦難史觀을 중심으로-" 숭실대학교 한국기독교문화연구소 3 : 1985
5 장규식, "일제하 한국 기독교 민족주의 연구" 혜안 2001
6 방기중, "백남운의 역사이론과 한국사인식" (여름) : 1990
7 함석헌, "뜻으로 본 한국역사" 한길사 2003
8 李基白, "나의 한국사 연구" 韓國史學史學報 2000
9 양현혜, "김교신, 함석헌 그리고 우찌무라 간죠(內村鑑三)" 한국교회사학회 (18) : 67-95, 2006
10 박걸순, "국학운동"
11 文一平, "高麗의 國家的 理想(上·下)" 한빛 1928
12 박걸순, "韓國近代史學史硏究" 국학자료원 1998
13 "聖書朝鮮"
14 李基白, "社會經濟史學과 實證史學의 問題 in: 歷史와 民族" 일조각 1971
15 趙東杰, "現代韓國史學史" 나남출판 1998
16 "東亞日報"
17 白南雲, "朝鮮社會經濟史"
18 "朝鮮日報"
19 "朝鮮中央日報"
20 金容燮, "日本·韓國에 있어서의 韓國史敍述" 31 : 1966
21 함석헌, "咸錫憲全集" 한길사 1983
22 千寬宇, "咸先生의 韓國史觀"
23 文一平, "史眼으로 본 朝鮮" 湖岩全集 1939
24 조광, "1930년대 咸錫憲의 역사인식과 한국사 이해" 한국사상사학회 21 (21): 507-547, 2003
25 박걸순, "1920년대 申采浩의 역사인식과 역사서술 ―『朝鮮史硏究草』를 중심으로―" 호서사학회 (50) : 105-142, 2008
26 李萬烈, ""한국 近代史學의 계보" in: 韓國近代歷史學의 理解" 문학과 지성사 1981
27 李萬烈, ""한 역사학도에게 비친 함석헌 선생" in: 나의 스승 咸錫憲" 해동문화사 1991
28 李基白, ""唯物史觀的 韓國史像" in: 現代 韓國史學과 史觀" 일조각 1991
중일전쟁시기(1931~1945) 중국 역사학계의 연구동향
주자의 『자치통감강목』의 「凡例」와 화서학파의 『송원화동사합편강목』의 「書法」 비교
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2026 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2017-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) | |
2013-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2006-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2005-04-26 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : 미등록 -> The Korean Society of History of Historiography | |
2005-04-10 | 학술지등록 | 한글명 : 韓國史學史學報외국어명 : The Korean Journal of History of Historiography | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.47 | 0.47 | 0.62 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.61 | 0.54 | 1.937 | 0.12 |