RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      굴절력 매트릭스에 근거한 Javal법칙의 신뢰도

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103541987

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of several versions of Javal’s rule predicting refractive astigmatism from corneal astigmatism on the basis of dioptric power matrix. Methods: A total of 84 subjects (168 eyes, mean age 24.67±1.59 years) partici...

      Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of several versions of Javal’s rule predicting refractive astigmatism from corneal astigmatism on the basis of dioptric power matrix. Methods: A total of 84 subjects (168 eyes, mean age 24.67±1.59 years) participated in this study. Corneal astigmatism (Ac) was measured by auto kerato-refractometer. Refractive astigmatism (At) was predicted by dioptric power matrix using four versions of original Javal’s rule (OJR), simplified Javal’s rule (SJR), Yoo’s regression equation (YRE), and vector-based Javal’s rule (VJR) from Ac. The subjectively determined refractive astigmatism (SAt) was taken best corrected visual acuity. Results: The relations between axes of Ac and At were represented high values (r = 0.891 to 0.971, p<0.001), the relations between axes of At and SAt were represented low values (r = 0.182 to 0.223, p = 0.004-0.018) for all four versions. The mean magnitudes of At and SAt for the VJR were 0.80±0.58 D and 0.82±0.65 D respectively. The difference between two values was not significant in paired t-test as relative reliability (p = 0.662). In Bland-Altman analysis as absolute reliability, the mean difference of At and SAt for the VJR had a small bias of –0.02±0.51 D. In comparison of previous cylindrical power, the difference between At and SAt was decreased in order of OJR, YRE, SJR, and VJR. In those of differences, OJR showed the lowest distribution within all intervals (≤ 2.00 D), VJR showed the highest distribution at the less than 0.75 D. The anticipated constant optimization were range from 0.79 to 1.00 for corneal astigmatism as the differences between At and SAt were the boundaries between more and less. Conclusions: Vector-based Javal’s rule is more reliable in predicting refractive astigmatism from corneal astigmatism, and the constant of 0.79 to 1.00 for corneal astigmatism in Javal’s rule except this rule may be applied in clinical prediction with simplicity by arithmetic operation.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 유종숙, "한국인의 20대에서 각막난시에 의한 전난시량의 예측" 한국안광학회 13 (13): 151-154, 2008

      2 유동식, "구면 RGP 렌즈의 처방 굴절력 예측" 한국안광학회 15 (15): 219-225, 2010

      3 Motlagh MG, "Validity of simlified Javal’s Rule in 147pre-operation cataract eyes" 1 (1): 630-, 2015

      4 Mote HG, "The significance of Javal's rule" 16 (16): 362-365, 1939

      5 Lam AK, "The aging effect on corneal curvature and the validity of Javal's rule in Hong Kong Chinese" 18 (18): 83-90, 1999

      6 Bland JM, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement" 1 (1): 307-310, 1986

      7 Bruton A, "Reliability : what is it and how is it measured?" 86 (86): 94-99, 2000

      8 Grosvenor T., "Primary care optometry" Butterworth-Heinemann 186-188, 2007

      9 Grosvenor T, "Predicting refractive astigmatism : a suggested simplification of Javal’s rule" 65 (65): 292-297, 1988

      10 Harris WF, "Power vectors versus power matrices, and the mathematical nature of dioptric power" 84 (84): 1060-1063, 2007

      1 유종숙, "한국인의 20대에서 각막난시에 의한 전난시량의 예측" 한국안광학회 13 (13): 151-154, 2008

      2 유동식, "구면 RGP 렌즈의 처방 굴절력 예측" 한국안광학회 15 (15): 219-225, 2010

      3 Motlagh MG, "Validity of simlified Javal’s Rule in 147pre-operation cataract eyes" 1 (1): 630-, 2015

      4 Mote HG, "The significance of Javal's rule" 16 (16): 362-365, 1939

      5 Lam AK, "The aging effect on corneal curvature and the validity of Javal's rule in Hong Kong Chinese" 18 (18): 83-90, 1999

      6 Bland JM, "Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement" 1 (1): 307-310, 1986

      7 Bruton A, "Reliability : what is it and how is it measured?" 86 (86): 94-99, 2000

      8 Grosvenor T., "Primary care optometry" Butterworth-Heinemann 186-188, 2007

      9 Grosvenor T, "Predicting refractive astigmatism : a suggested simplification of Javal’s rule" 65 (65): 292-297, 1988

      10 Harris WF, "Power vectors versus power matrices, and the mathematical nature of dioptric power" 84 (84): 1060-1063, 2007

      11 Thibos LN, "Power vectors : an application of Fourier analysis to the description and statistical analysis of refractive error" 74 (74): 367-375, 1997

      12 Neumueller J, "Optical, physiological and perceptual factors influencing the ophthalmometric findings" 30 (30): 281-291, 1953

      13 Colliac JP, "Matrix formula for intraocular lens power calculation" 31 (31): 374-381, 1990

      14 Grosvenor T, "Is the relation between keratometric astigmatism and refractive astigmatism linear?" 67 (67): 606-609, 1990

      15 Kreda S, "How to refine toric lens prescriptions : you can simplify the process of measuring crossed cylinders by applying the principles of vector analysis to optics" 47 (47): 44-46, 2012

      16 Schwartz SH., "Geometric and visual optics: a clinical introduction" McGraw-Hill 219-221, 2002

      17 Hollady JT, "Evaluating and reporting astigmatism for individual and aggregate data" 24 (24): 57-65, 1998

      18 Tong L, "Corneal and refractive error astigmatism in Singaporean schoolchildren : a vector-based Javal's rule" 78 (78): 881-887, 2001

      19 Raasch T, "Clinical refraction in three-dimensional dioptric space revisited" 74 (74): 376-380, 1997

      20 Miller JM, "Clinical applications of power vectors" 86 (86): 599-602, 2009

      21 Benjamin W, "Borish's clinical refraction" Butterworth-Heinemann 655-, 2006

      22 Asiedu K, "Autorefraction, retinoscopy, Javal's rule, and Grosvenor's modified Javal's rule : the best predictor of refractive astigmatism" 2016 : 3584137-, 2016

      23 Elliott M, "Accuracy of Javal’s rule in the determination of spectacle astigmatism" 71 (71): 23-26, 1994

      24 Kratz JD, "A modification of Javal's rule for the correction of astigmatism" 26 (26): 295-306, 1949

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2022 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2019-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2016-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2012-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2008-01-17 학회명변경 영문명 : The Korean Ophalmic Optics Society -> The Korean Ophthalmic Optics Society KCI등재후보
      2008-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.62 0.62 0.53
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.58 0.58 0.691 0.17
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼