RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      한국 바이오제약 산업의 기업효율성과 개방형혁신 영향 분석

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=T16951453

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      The biopharmaceutical industry has a high future growth potential, characterized by enormous R&D investment, high risk and high return, strict regulations by regulators and the occurrence of economies of scale at the global market level. The biopharmaceutical companies that are in the nature of the R&D-oriented and state-controlled industry have come to seek new and diverse business models to efficiently develop products. In addition, Biopharmaceutical companies has increasingly embraced open innovative R&D models, moving away from the existing closed R&D approach. In response to recent changes in the external environment, this study was classified Korea biopharmaceutical companies by business modes and was analyzed the corporate efficiency. Next, by checking the trend of changes in corporate efficiency by business model, the change in corporate efficiency was analyzed during the analysis period. Finally, the factors affecting corporate efficiency were analyzed from an open innovation perspective to analyze which innovation activities affect corporate efficiency. The analysis data was from 2015 to 2021 of the ‘Bio Industry Survey’ conducted by the Korea Biotechnology Industry Organization (KBIO) every year through surveys, and the actual analysis was analyzed from 2018 to 2021 reflecting the three-year performance lag. First, Korea biopharmaceutical companies were classified into an ‘Integrated business model group’ that combines production and research, and a ‘R&D focused business model group’ that generates profits by focusing on research. As a result of analyzing corporate efficiency using the DEA analysis method, the R&D focused business model group was analyzed to be more efficient than the Integrated business model group and the comparison by size was analyzed to be highly efficient for companies with large sales. Next, Korea biopharmaceutical companies based on business model was checked Malmquist productivity index, as a result, during the analysis period, including the period when COVID-19 was severe, Korea biopharmaceutical companies saw their overall efficiency increase. However, this efficiency was analyzed to have a greater impact on internal management such as management efficiency than technological innovation. Finally, Tobit analysis was conducted to confirm the factors affecting this efficiency from an open innovation perspective and among the open innovation types, non-technical cooperation types were found to have a positive (+) effect on corporate efficiency rather than technological cooperation types. In individual activities, it was confirmed that joint ventures had a positive (+) effect, and joint research had a negative (-) effect. It is judged that three years of R&D time in the biopharmaceutical field is insufficient to confirm its effectiveness. However, because of the analysis based on the start of open innovation, it was confirmed that joint research had a positive (+) effect in some groups, reaffirming that R&D is an area that requires long-term support. Through the above analysis, Korea biopharmaceutical industry was found that R&D focused business model companies were managing more efficiently than Integrated business model companies that produce and research at the same time. And it was confirmed that corporate efficiency needs to be increased by improving sales volume. In addition, it was confirmed that biopharmaceutical companies require intensive investment in R&D, but financial investment is an efficient management strategy rather than R&D that requires long-term resource investment to increase efficiency in the short term. Through this study, we can identify the characteristics of business models and open innovation in the Korea biopharmaceutical industry, and what efforts need to be made to increase the efficiency of the company. Key words: Biopharmaceutical industry, Corporate efficiency, Business model, Open Innovation, DEA, Tobit, Malmquist index
      번역하기

      The biopharmaceutical industry has a high future growth potential, characterized by enormous R&D investment, high risk and high return, strict regulations by regulators and the occurrence of economies of scale at the global market level. The bioph...

      The biopharmaceutical industry has a high future growth potential, characterized by enormous R&D investment, high risk and high return, strict regulations by regulators and the occurrence of economies of scale at the global market level. The biopharmaceutical companies that are in the nature of the R&D-oriented and state-controlled industry have come to seek new and diverse business models to efficiently develop products. In addition, Biopharmaceutical companies has increasingly embraced open innovative R&D models, moving away from the existing closed R&D approach. In response to recent changes in the external environment, this study was classified Korea biopharmaceutical companies by business modes and was analyzed the corporate efficiency. Next, by checking the trend of changes in corporate efficiency by business model, the change in corporate efficiency was analyzed during the analysis period. Finally, the factors affecting corporate efficiency were analyzed from an open innovation perspective to analyze which innovation activities affect corporate efficiency. The analysis data was from 2015 to 2021 of the ‘Bio Industry Survey’ conducted by the Korea Biotechnology Industry Organization (KBIO) every year through surveys, and the actual analysis was analyzed from 2018 to 2021 reflecting the three-year performance lag. First, Korea biopharmaceutical companies were classified into an ‘Integrated business model group’ that combines production and research, and a ‘R&D focused business model group’ that generates profits by focusing on research. As a result of analyzing corporate efficiency using the DEA analysis method, the R&D focused business model group was analyzed to be more efficient than the Integrated business model group and the comparison by size was analyzed to be highly efficient for companies with large sales. Next, Korea biopharmaceutical companies based on business model was checked Malmquist productivity index, as a result, during the analysis period, including the period when COVID-19 was severe, Korea biopharmaceutical companies saw their overall efficiency increase. However, this efficiency was analyzed to have a greater impact on internal management such as management efficiency than technological innovation. Finally, Tobit analysis was conducted to confirm the factors affecting this efficiency from an open innovation perspective and among the open innovation types, non-technical cooperation types were found to have a positive (+) effect on corporate efficiency rather than technological cooperation types. In individual activities, it was confirmed that joint ventures had a positive (+) effect, and joint research had a negative (-) effect. It is judged that three years of R&D time in the biopharmaceutical field is insufficient to confirm its effectiveness. However, because of the analysis based on the start of open innovation, it was confirmed that joint research had a positive (+) effect in some groups, reaffirming that R&D is an area that requires long-term support. Through the above analysis, Korea biopharmaceutical industry was found that R&D focused business model companies were managing more efficiently than Integrated business model companies that produce and research at the same time. And it was confirmed that corporate efficiency needs to be increased by improving sales volume. In addition, it was confirmed that biopharmaceutical companies require intensive investment in R&D, but financial investment is an efficient management strategy rather than R&D that requires long-term resource investment to increase efficiency in the short term. Through this study, we can identify the characteristics of business models and open innovation in the Korea biopharmaceutical industry, and what efforts need to be made to increase the efficiency of the company. Key words: Biopharmaceutical industry, Corporate efficiency, Business model, Open Innovation, DEA, Tobit, Malmquist index

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 제1장 서론 1
      • 제1절 연구 목적 1
      • 제2절 연구 구성 3
      • 제3절 연구 모형 4
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 7
      • 제1장 서론 1
      • 제1절 연구 목적 1
      • 제2절 연구 구성 3
      • 제3절 연구 모형 4
      • 제2장 이론적 배경 7
      • 제1절 바이오제약 산업 현황 및 특성 7
      • (1) 바이오제약 산업 현황 7
      • (2) 바이오제약 산업 특성 18
      • 제2절 바이오제약 산업과 비즈니스모델 21
      • (1) 비즈니스모델 정의 21
      • (2) 바이오제약 산업과 비즈니스모델 24
      • 제3절 바이오제약 산업과 개방형혁신 30
      • (1) 개방형혁신 정의 30
      • (2) 바이오제약 산업과 개방형혁신 36
      • 제4절 바이오제약 산업과 기업효율성 42
      • (1) 바이오제약 산업의 효율성 관련 선행연구 42
      • (2) 바이오제약 산업의 효율성 변화 관련 선행연구 48
      • (3) 바이오제약 산업의 효율성 영향요인 관련 선행연구 50
      • 제3장 연구방법론 56
      • 제1절 데이터 56
      • (1) 기업효율성 분석 데이터 56
      • (2) 기업효율성 변화 분석 데이터 59
      • (3) 기업효율성 영향요인 분석 데이터 59
      • 제2절 분석방법 61
      • (1) 기업효율성 분석방법 61
      • (2) 기업효율성 변화 분석방법 67
      • (3) 기업효율성 영향요인 분석방법 70
      • 제3절 변수 72
      • (1) 기업효율성 분석 변수 72
      • (2) 기업효율성 변화 분석 변수 74
      • (3) 기업효율성 영향요인 분석 변수 75
      • 제4장 분석 결과 78
      • 제1절 기업효율성 분석 결과 78
      • (1) 비즈니스모델별 기업효율성 분석 결과 78
      • (2) 기업규모별 기업효율성 분석 결과 80
      • 제2절 기업효율성 변화 분석 결과 82
      • (1) 기업효율성 변화지수 분석 결과 82
      • (2) 기업효율성 변화율 분석 결과 84
      • 제3절 기업효율성 영향요인 분석 결과 86
      • (1) 개방형혁신 유형별 기업효율성 분석 결과 86
      • (2) 개방형혁신 활동별 기업효율성 분석 결과 87
      • (3) 개방형혁신 착수시점별 기업효율성 분석 결과 89
      • 제5장 토의 93
      • (1) 기업효율성 분석 93
      • (2) 기업효율성 변화 분석 94
      • (3) 기업효율성 영향요인 분석 96
      • 제6장 결론 및 시사점 98
      • 제1절 연구결과 요약 98
      • 제2절 연구결과 시사점 및 제언 99
      • 제3절 연구의 한계점 및 향후 연구방향 105
      • 참고 문헌 106
      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼