RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      심혈관질환 위험 기반 생물학적 연령 산출을 이용한 전체 사망 및 의료비 예측: 건강보험공단 맞춤형 자료 분석 = Estimation of Biological Age Based on Cardiovascular Risk and Its Predictive Validity for All-Cause Mortality and Healthcare Costs: Evidence from National Health Screening Data

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A109944748

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Background: Chronological age (CA) has limitations in predicting individual health risks and healthcare expenditures. Biological age (BA), estimated from health status indicators, has gained attention as an alternative. This study calculated BA based on the predicted risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalization using health screening data and defined the difference between BA and CA (BA–CA) as accelerated aging (AA). The study aimed to evaluate whether BA has equal or better predictive power than CA for all-cause mortality and healthcare expenditure, and to quantify medical cost differences according to AA level through simulation analysis. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of approximately 11.7 million Korean adults aged 40 and over who underwent health check-ups between 2012 and 2014, with follow-up until 2023. BA was derived from clinical indicators, lifestyle factors, and environmental exposure using a sex stratified Cox model estimating 10-year CVD hospitalization risk, and AA (BA–CA) was used as the main explanatory variable. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and annual total medical cost, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare predictive performance between BA- and CA-based models. Regression models were used to assess the association between AA and medical cost, and cost differences under varying BA levels within the same CA group were illustrated via simulation. Results: Higher BA was significantly associated with increased mortality and medical expenditure. BA-based models showed comparable AUROC values to CA-based models. A non-linear relationship was observed between AA and cost: as AA increased, medical cost rose continuously in women but plateaued or declined in men beyond a certain threshold. Simulation results estimated that among 65-year-old men, those with BA of 70 incurred Korean won 340,000 more in annual medical cost than those with BA of 60 based on the 2012 medical expense usage. Conclusion: BA derived from routine health screenings data accurately predicts individual mortality and healthcare costs, complementing traditional CA-based models. AA is a practical indicator for identifying high-risk populations, evaluating intervention effects, and simulating healthcare budget scenarios.
      번역하기

      Background: Chronological age (CA) has limitations in predicting individual health risks and healthcare expenditures. Biological age (BA), estimated from health status indicators, has gained attention as an alternative. This study calculated BA based ...

      Background: Chronological age (CA) has limitations in predicting individual health risks and healthcare expenditures. Biological age (BA), estimated from health status indicators, has gained attention as an alternative. This study calculated BA based on the predicted risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) hospitalization using health screening data and defined the difference between BA and CA (BA–CA) as accelerated aging (AA). The study aimed to evaluate whether BA has equal or better predictive power than CA for all-cause mortality and healthcare expenditure, and to quantify medical cost differences according to AA level through simulation analysis. Methods: We analyzed a cohort of approximately 11.7 million Korean adults aged 40 and over who underwent health check-ups between 2012 and 2014, with follow-up until 2023. BA was derived from clinical indicators, lifestyle factors, and environmental exposure using a sex stratified Cox model estimating 10-year CVD hospitalization risk, and AA (BA–CA) was used as the main explanatory variable. Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and annual total medical cost, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used to compare predictive performance between BA- and CA-based models. Regression models were used to assess the association between AA and medical cost, and cost differences under varying BA levels within the same CA group were illustrated via simulation. Results: Higher BA was significantly associated with increased mortality and medical expenditure. BA-based models showed comparable AUROC values to CA-based models. A non-linear relationship was observed between AA and cost: as AA increased, medical cost rose continuously in women but plateaued or declined in men beyond a certain threshold. Simulation results estimated that among 65-year-old men, those with BA of 70 incurred Korean won 340,000 more in annual medical cost than those with BA of 60 based on the 2012 medical expense usage. Conclusion: BA derived from routine health screenings data accurately predicts individual mortality and healthcare costs, complementing traditional CA-based models. AA is a practical indicator for identifying high-risk populations, evaluating intervention effects, and simulating healthcare budget scenarios.

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼