이두근 장두 건 고정술시 강한 고정이 필요한가?

국문 초록 (Abstract)

다양한 이두근 건고정술이 시행되고 있어서, 문헌들의 결과를 단순 비교하기 어렵게 만든다. 이두근 장두의 건고정술은 첫째로, 시술을 관혈적 절개를 통하여 시행하는가 또는 관절경을 이용한 방법으로 시행하는가로 구분해 볼 수 있다. 두 번째로는, 이두건 자체를 고정하는 주변 조직에 따라서 연부 조직 건고정술과 골 고정술로 나눌 수 있다. 세 번째로는, 고정하는 위치에 따라 근위부와 원위부로 구분할 수 있다. 네 번째로는, 건 고정술에 기구(간섭 나사, 봉합 나사, 비매듭 봉합나사 등)를 사용하는 가에 따라서 구분해 볼 수 있다. 적절한 고정력이 어느 정도인지 밝혀지기까지는 단정적인 결론은 보류되어야 한다.

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

Various biceps tenodesis techniques being used, make it difficult to compare the result of reports. First, the biceps tenodesis could be classified according to being performed by open incision or by the arthroscopic procedure. Second, it could be classified as a soft tissue and bony tenodesis according to the tissue which the long head of biceps is fixed with. Third, it could be classified as a proximal and distal tenodesis according to the location which the long head of biceps is fixed with. Fourth, it could be classified according to the implant (interference screw, suture anchor, knotless suture anchor). A decision should be suspended until an appropriate strength of tenodesis is revealed.

목차 (Table of Contents)

• 서론
• 건 고정술의 분류
• 연부 조직 건고정술
• 골 건고정술
• 생역학적 비교 실험
• 건고정술 실패 보고
• 결론
• REFERENCES
• 초록

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 Mazzocca AD, "The biomechanical evaluation of four fixation techniques for proximal biceps tenodesis" 21 : 1296-1306, 2005

2 Kusma M, "Tenodesis of the long head of biceps brachii : cyclic testing of five methods of fixation in a porcine model" 17 : 967-973, 2008

3 Patzer T, "Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis : biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions" 21 : 116-125, 2012

4 Jarrett CD, "Minimally invasive proximal biceps tenodesis : an anatomical study for optimal placement and safe surgical technique" 20 : 477-480, 2011

5 Ozalay M, "Mechanical strength of four different biceps tenodesis techniques" 21 : 992-998, 2005

6 Froimson AI, "Keyhole tenodesis of biceps origin at the shoulder" 112 : 245-249, 1975

7 Millett PJ, "Interference screw vs. suture anchor fixation for open subpectoral biceps tenodesis: does it matter?" 9 : 121-, 2008

8 Golish SR, "Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study" 24 : 1103-1108, 2008

9 Nho SJ, "Complications associated with subpectoral biceps tenodesis: low rates of incidence following surgery" 19 : 764-768, 2010

10 Sanders B, "Clinical success of biceps tenodesis with and without release of the transverse humeral ligament" 21 : 66-71, 2012

11 Mazzocca AD, "Clinical outcomes after subpectoral biceps tenodesis with an interference screw" 36 : 1922-1929, 2008

12 Papp DF, "Biomechanical evaluation of open suture anchor fixation versus interference screw for biceps tenodesis" 34 : 275-278, 2011

13 Slenker NR, "Biceps tenotomy versus tenodesis : clinical outcomes" 28 : 576-582, 2012

14 Jayamoorthy T, "Biceps tenodesis : a biomechanical study of fixation methods" 13 : 160-164, 2004

15 Richards DP, "Arthroscopic-assisted biceps tenodesis for ruptures of the long head of biceps brachii: The cobra procedure" 20 (20): 201-207, 2004

16 Scheibel M, "Arthroscopic soft tissue tenodesis versus bony fixation anchor tenodesis of the long head of the biceps tendon" 39 : 1046-1052, 2011

17 Amaravathi RS, "Arthroscopic keyhole proximal biceps tenodesis : a technical note" 19 : 379-383, 2011

18 Elkousy HA, "Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis using the percutaneous, intra-articular trans-tendon technique : preliminary results" 28 : 1316-1319, 2005

19 Lafosse L, "Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis to supraspinatus tendon : technical note" 40 : 345-347, 2011

20 George MS, "Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis incorporated into rotator cuff repair using suture anchors" 31 : 552-555, 2008

21 Gartsman GM, "Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis : operative technique" 16 : 550-552, 2000

22 Romeo AA, "Arthroscopic biceps tenodesis" 20 : 206-213, 2004

23 Richards DP, "A biomechanical analysis of two biceps tenodesis fixation techniques" 21 : 861-866, 2005