The paper intends to indicate that the “small-China” consciousness in Chosŏn, throughout 518 years (1392-1910) of its history, can be divided into three different kinds of self-identification. The first one is the establishment of “Tankun Chos�...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103771243
張崑將 (國立臺灣師範大學東亞學系)
2013
Chinese
小中華 ; 朝鮮 ; 自我情感 ; 箕氏朝鮮 ; 檀君朝鮮 ; Small-China ; Chosŏn ; Ethnical sentiment ; Ki Chosŏn ; Tankun Chosŏn
KCI등재,SCOPUS
학술저널
183-206(24쪽)
0
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
The paper intends to indicate that the “small-China” consciousness in Chosŏn, throughout 518 years (1392-1910) of its history, can be divided into three different kinds of self-identification. The first one is the establishment of “Tankun Chos�...
The paper intends to indicate that the “small-China” consciousness in Chosŏn, throughout 518 years (1392-1910) of its history, can be divided into three different kinds of self-identification. The first one is the establishment of “Tankun Chosŏn” on Ki Chosŏn through the process of tracing the origin of the small-China consciousness. It was originated from an ethnical sentiment. The second type of self-identification is a cultural identification that “we are the only Chinese,” which was derived from its small-China consciousness under the political upheaval in the metamorphosis between the Chinese and the barbarians. The “we are the only Chinese” sentiment can be divided into two different stages. The first stage occurred when the Manchurians overthrew the Ming Dynasty. China became the realm of the barbarians, so China was no longer an authentic China. The Chosŏn Confucians began to believe that “we are the only Chinese” left in the world, and such a sentiment came from a mixture of political and cultural factors. The political factor was derived from the orthodox thinking of “revering the Zhou and admiring the Ming,” so the Qing Dynasty was not considered an orthodox regime. Culturally speaking, Chosŏn Confucians mourned for the loss of China because China had unfortunately fallen into the hands of the barbarians. They felt the need to carry the responsibility of being “Chinese.” There was even a sense of self-importance that the “small China” could become the “big China.” The second stage of “we are the only Chinese” occurred after the Western invasion. “Western barbarians” and the “Japanese Empire” threatened the “Qing barbarians.” When the “Qing barbarians” were finally overthrown and Chosŏn was also subjugated by the Japanese Empire, a special sentiment about “the re-appearance of a great China” emerged.
다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
本文企圖指出, 「小中華」意識在朝鮮518年(1392-1910)的漫長歷史過程中, 至少可區分以下三種展現主體自我的認同情感:第一種主體自我的認同情感是在小中華意識的溯源過程中, 在箕氏朝鮮之...
本文企圖指出, 「小中華」意識在朝鮮518年(1392-1910)的漫長歷史過程中, 至少可區分以下三種展現主體自我的認同情感:第一種主體自我的認同情感是在小中華意識的溯源過程中, 在箕氏朝鮮之「上」, 另立「檀君朝鮮」的自我認同之情感。這一類情感是來自於民族根源的情感。第二種主體自我的認同情感是小中華意識在華夷變態的政治巨變中, 出現所謂的「唯我是華」的自我文化認同之情感。「唯我是華」又可區分兩階段, 第一個階段是面對清人滅明後的華夷變態情勢, 中華淪為夷狄, 華已不華, 天下僅存「唯我是華」的自我情感, 這一類自我情感的特色, 可說夾雜著政治與文化上的情感。政治上的情感來自於「尊周思明」的正統意識, 不以清為正統;文化上的情感則哀嘆中華竟淪為夷狄, 充滿「華」的自任自重感, 甚至出現「小華」也可以成為「大華」的自負感。「唯我是華」的第二個階段是在西人勢力(「洋夷」)入侵以後的小中華意識, 「洋夷」或「日帝」威脅著「清夷」, 而「清夷」終被推翻, 同時朝鮮也亡於日帝的兼併, 這時出現期待「大華重現」的特殊情感。
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 이상익, "조선시대 중화주의의 두 흐름 (朝鮮時代中華主義的兩條潮流)" 韓國哲學史研究會 24 : 2008
2 우경섭, "송시열의 화이론과 조선중화주의의성립(宋時烈的華夷論與朝鮮中華主義的成立)" 101 : 2006
3 "高麗史 Koryŏsa(History of Koryŏ Dynasty)"
4 "韓國儒學思想論文集 第26冊" 景仁文化 1994
5 安錫儆, "霅橋遺集, In 擬大庭對策"
6 黃俊傑, "論中國經典中「中國」概念的涵義及其在近世日本與現代臺灣的轉化" 3 (3): 2006
7 吉田松陰, "與赤川淡水書, In 吉田松陰全集 第二卷" 岩波書店 1986
8 李廷龜, "箕子廟碑銘, In 月沙先生集 卷之45" 民族文化推進會 1990
9 "禦批歷代通鑑輯覽 Yupi Lidai Tongjian Jilan"
10 柳重教, "省齋先生文集 , 卷之三十二, 講說雜稿•正統論"
1 이상익, "조선시대 중화주의의 두 흐름 (朝鮮時代中華主義的兩條潮流)" 韓國哲學史研究會 24 : 2008
2 우경섭, "송시열의 화이론과 조선중화주의의성립(宋時烈的華夷論與朝鮮中華主義的成立)" 101 : 2006
3 "高麗史 Koryŏsa(History of Koryŏ Dynasty)"
4 "韓國儒學思想論文集 第26冊" 景仁文化 1994
5 安錫儆, "霅橋遺集, In 擬大庭對策"
6 黃俊傑, "論中國經典中「中國」概念的涵義及其在近世日本與現代臺灣的轉化" 3 (3): 2006
7 吉田松陰, "與赤川淡水書, In 吉田松陰全集 第二卷" 岩波書店 1986
8 李廷龜, "箕子廟碑銘, In 月沙先生集 卷之45" 民族文化推進會 1990
9 "禦批歷代通鑑輯覽 Yupi Lidai Tongjian Jilan"
10 柳重教, "省齋先生文集 , 卷之三十二, 講說雜稿•正統論"
11 樸趾源, "燕巖集 卷之十三, 第252冊"
12 尹愭, "無名子集文稿 冊八, 策·東方疆域"
13 宋秉璿, "淵齋先生文集卷之二十三, 衛正新書序"
14 柳麟錫, "毅菴先生文集 卷之十二, 書·與中華國袁總統"
15 柳麟錫, "毅菴先生文集 卷之三十二, 雜著·散言"
16 柳麟錫, "毅菴先生文集 卷之三十三, 雜著·散言"
17 成海應, "正統論, In 硏經齋全集, 卷之三十二, 風泉錄二"
18 崔錫鼎, "正統論, In 明穀集, 卷之十一"
19 陳澕, "梅湖遺稿 之 奉使入金"
20 安鼎福, "東史綱目 第二冊, 卷七" 景仁 1970
21 黃俊傑教授, "東亞文化交流史中的「去脈絡化」與「再脈絡化」現象及其研究方法論問題" 2 (2): 2012
22 "朝鮮王朝實錄 Annals of the Chosŏn Dynasty"
23 鄭墡謨, "朝鮮漢學中的「小中華」意識:「小中華」意識的成立與轉變" 國家圖書館國際會議廳 2010
24 趙憲, "朝天日記 重峰集, In 燕行錄 第五冊"
25 "春秋左傳 Commentary of Zuo"
26 李瀷, "星湖僿說 卷一 天地門 之 檀箕疆域" 民族文化推進委員會 1966
27 會澤正志齋, "新論, In 水戶學" 岩波書店 1982
28 樸寅亮, "文王哀冊, In 影印標點東文選 第1冊, 卷28" 韓國民族文化推進會 1999
29 崔溥, "慕華館記, In 錦南先生集 卷之一, 第16冊"
30 白永瑞, "思想東亞:韓半島視角的歷史與實踐" 臺灣社會研究雜誌社 2009
31 李觀命, "屏山集 卷之九, In 肅宗大王行狀, 第177冊"
32 宋時烈, "宋子大全卷十三, 請神德王後祔廟箚"
33 松宮觀山, "學論" 鳳出版株式會社 1978
34 孫衛國, "大明旗號與小中華意識:朝鮮王朝尊周思明問題研究(1637-1800)" 商務印書館 2007
35 杜聰明, "回憶錄" 龍文出版社 1989
36 張崑將, "吉田松陰《講孟餘話》的詮釋特質與其批判" 27 (27): 2009
37 "前漢紀 Annals of the Former Han dynasty"
38 饒宗頤, "中國史學上之正統論" 遠東出版社 1996
39 王爾敏, "中國 名稱溯源及其近代詮釋, In 中國近代思想史論" 作者自印 1977
40 高麗忠烈王(在位1275-1308)一然和尚所著, "三國遺事 第一卷〈紀異〉" 東方文化 1971
41 "(明)姚廣孝鈔本:明太祖高皇帝實録【Ming】Ming Taizu Gao huang di shilu"
The Concept of Social Responsibility as It Appears in Vietnamese Confucianism
“以中釋中”的學術新作 ——《思想世界的概念系統》一書的書評 (曾振宇 著, 人民出版社, ISBN:9787010108575)
Three Differences between Buddhism and Confucianism -------- Zhu Xi’s Argument and Explanation
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2027 | 평가예정 | 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증) | |
2021-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) | |
2018-12-20 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 國際版<儒敎文化硏究> -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture외국어명 : 미등록 -> Journal of Confucian Philosophy and Culture | |
2018-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2015-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2011-06-13 | 학회명변경 | 영문명 : Institute of Confucian Cultural Studies -> Institute of Confucian Philosophy and Culture | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2010-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2008-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.08 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.06 | 0.04 | 0.351 | 0.1 |