The Different Aspects between Anaphor Binding and Scope Interpretation in the Dative IO/CAUSEE Constructions

다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

The dative indirect object (IO) or CAUSEE triggers freezing effects of the reflexive anaphor binding or the scope interpretation against the direct object (DO) in the IO/CAUSEE-DO order. There are freezing effect differences in between. The narrow scope of the DO is always triggered by the dative IO or CAUSEE whatever the word order is. However, the anaphor binding of the DO cannot be induced by its following dative IO or CAUSEE. The scope freezing effect of the IO or CAUSEE against the DO disappears when the IO or CAUSEE undergoes case alternation with accusative. The new discoveries are as follows. The anaphor in the DO position of the host clause of the gapped right dislocation constructions can be coindexed with the subject appendix, but not with the dative IO or CAUSEE appendix. The dative IO or CAUSEE always triggers scope freezing effect against the DO, regardless of whether the IO precedes or follows the DO. These are different aspects between anaphor binding and scope interpretation in the dative IO/CAUSEE constructions.

참고문헌 (Reference)

1 김광섭, "후행결속(Backward Binding)과 비명시 논항(Implicit Argument)" 한국현대언어학회 23 (23): 621-639, 2008

2 고희정, "Two Ways to the Right: A Hybrid approach to Right-dislocation in Korean" 언어교육원 51 (51): 3-40, 2015

3 Pesetsky, D., "The representation of (in)definiteness" MIT Press 98-129, 1987

4 Merchant, J., "The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis" Oxford University Press 2001

5 Cho, S. -W, "The Syntactic and Semantic Ambiguity of CAKI ‘self’ in Korean" 13 : 149-165, 2006

6 Kuno, S., "The Structure of the Japanese Language" MIT Press 1973

7 Bruening, B., "Syntax at the Edge: Cross-clausal Phenomena and the Syntax of Passamaquoddy" MIT 2001

8 Lee, D. -W, "Scope Interpretation in Ellipsis" Korea National University of Transportation 7 : 161-176, 2018

9 Ott, D., "Right-dislocation as Deletion" 34 (34): 641-690, 2015

10 정대호, "Replies to Lee (2009): In Defence of a Double Clause Approach to the Right Dislocated Construction" 현대문법학회 (61) : 167-196, 2010

11 Hornstein, N., "Reconstruction and Derivation in the Theory of Syntax" Hankook Publishing Co 2003

12 박범식, "On the Island-(In)Sensitivity in the Right-Dislocation Construction in Korean" 언어과학회 (83) : 135-153, 2017

13 Abe, J., "On Directionality of Movement: A Case of Japanese Right dislocation" 45-61, 2004

14 Sohng, H. -K., "Long-distance Reflexivization and Subject Orientation in Korean, Chinese, and Japanese" 2004

15 Sells, P., "Japanese Postposing Involves No Movement" University of Manchester 1999

16 Park, B. -S., "Island-insensitive Fragment Answers in Korean" Simon Fraser University 317-325, 2005

17 이수환, "Inalienable possession construction and passive markers inducing an idiomatic interpretation" 언어정보연구소 34 (34): 239-272, 2017

18 이두원, "Goals in the Ditransitive Construction vs. Syntactic Subject Causees in the Morphological Causative" 현대문법학회 (47) : 53-72, 2007

19 고희정, "Gapless Right-Dislocation: The Role of Overt Correlates" 언어교육원 52 (52): 3-32, 2016

20 Nakanishi, K., "Frozen Scope and Week Crossover in Ditransitives" 41 : 109-126, 2001

21 Merchant, J, "Fragments and Ellipsis" 27 (27): 661-738, 2004

22 Larson, R, "Double Objects Revisited: Reply to Jackendoff" 21 : 589-632, 1990

23 Song, H. -K., "Causatives and Resultatives in Korean" University of Wisconsin-Madison 2005

24 박범식, "Case-drop, left-branch extraction and multiplicity in the right-dislocation construction" 언어정보연구소 33 (33): 259-297, 2016

25 이혜란, "Backward Anaphora" 대한언어학회 10 (10): 2002

26 정대호, "An Elliptical Coordination Analysis of the Right Dislocated Construction in Korean" 대한언어학회 17 (17): 1-23, 2009