RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      Indexical Realism by Inter-Agentic Reference

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A103480371

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      I happen to believe that although human experiences are to be characterized as pluralistic, they are all rooted in one reality. I would assume the thesis of pluralism but how could I maintain my belief in realism? There are various discussions in favo...

      I happen to believe that although human experiences are to be characterized as pluralistic, they are all rooted in one reality. I would assume the thesis of pluralism but how could I maintain my belief in realism? There are various discussions in favor of realism but they appear to stay within a particular paradigm and so to be called ‘internal realism.’ In this paper, I try to justify my belief in reality by discussing a special use of indexicals. I argue for my indexical realism by advancing the thesis that indexicals can be used as an inter-agentic referential term. Three arguments for the thesis are presented. The first argument derives from a revision of Kaplan-Kvart’s notion of exportation. The notions of exportation of singular terms can be analyzed as intra-agentic exportation in the context of a single speaker. This may be revised to be an inter-agentic exportation in the context of two speakers who use the same indexicals. The second argument is from the notion of causation, which is specifically characterized in the context of inter-theoretic reference. I argue that any two theories may each say “this” in order to refer to what is beyond its own theory. Two theories may address themselves to “this” same thing although what “this” represents in each theory can turn out to be different objects all together. The third argument is based on a possibility of natural reference. Reference is used to be taken mostly as a 3-place predicate: Abe refers an object oi with an expression ej. The traditional notion of reference has been constructive and anthropocentric. However, I argue that natural reference is a reference that we humans come to recognize among denumerably many objects in natural states: at moment mi in a natural state, there is a referential relation among objects o₁, o₂, o₃, …, oj, oj+1, … which interact with each other as agents of information processors. Natural reference is an original reference, which is given independently of a human language and to which humans are passive as they derivatively refer to it by using “this.”

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. Indexicals: A Foundation for Realism
      • Ⅱ. Inter-Personal Co-Referentiality
      • Ⅲ. Inter-Theoretic Co-Referentiality
      • Ⅳ. Natural Reference
      • ABSTRACT
      • Ⅰ. Indexicals: A Foundation for Realism
      • Ⅱ. Inter-Personal Co-Referentiality
      • Ⅲ. Inter-Theoretic Co-Referentiality
      • Ⅳ. Natural Reference
      • References
      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼