RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재후보

      무통 분만 시 경막외 제통 및 미추 블록이 분만 2기에 미치는 영향 = Effect of lumbar epidural and caudal analgesia on the second stage of labor

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104327673

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: Epidural analgesia is the most effective way of providing pain relief during labor. However, its effect on the second stage of labor is controversial. This study examined the effect of epidural analgesia combined with caudal analgesia on the second stage of labor.
      Methods: Forty three multiparous women were divided into three groups, non-epidural group, epidural group and epidural with caudal group. Epidural analgesia was maintained with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (0.09375% ropivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl)in both the epidural and epidural with caudal groups. The epidural with caudal group was injected with 0.09375% ropivacaine into the caudal epidural space after inserting the lumbar epidural catheter. The assessments made throughout labor included the visual analogue score (VAS), patient’s satisfaction, motor block and duration of the second stage.
      Results: There were no significant differences in the patient’s satisfaction, VAS and motor block between the epidural group and epidural with caudal group. There were no significant differences in the duration of the second stage between the non-epidural,epidural and epidural with caudal groups. No cesarean or instrumental deliveries were performed.
      Conclusions: Epidural with caudal analgesia offers no additional benefit during the second stage of labor. However, it carries no added risk on the maternal outcome.
      번역하기

      Background: Epidural analgesia is the most effective way of providing pain relief during labor. However, its effect on the second stage of labor is controversial. This study examined the effect of epidural analgesia combined with caudal analgesia on t...

      Background: Epidural analgesia is the most effective way of providing pain relief during labor. However, its effect on the second stage of labor is controversial. This study examined the effect of epidural analgesia combined with caudal analgesia on the second stage of labor.
      Methods: Forty three multiparous women were divided into three groups, non-epidural group, epidural group and epidural with caudal group. Epidural analgesia was maintained with patient-controlled epidural analgesia (0.09375% ropivacaine with 0.0002% fentanyl)in both the epidural and epidural with caudal groups. The epidural with caudal group was injected with 0.09375% ropivacaine into the caudal epidural space after inserting the lumbar epidural catheter. The assessments made throughout labor included the visual analogue score (VAS), patient’s satisfaction, motor block and duration of the second stage.
      Results: There were no significant differences in the patient’s satisfaction, VAS and motor block between the epidural group and epidural with caudal group. There were no significant differences in the duration of the second stage between the non-epidural,epidural and epidural with caudal groups. No cesarean or instrumental deliveries were performed.
      Conclusions: Epidural with caudal analgesia offers no additional benefit during the second stage of labor. However, it carries no added risk on the maternal outcome.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Bates RG, "Uterine activity in the second stage of labour and the effect of epidural analgesia" 92 : 1246-1250, 1985

      2 Segal S, "The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: A meta-analysis" 183 : 974-978, 2000

      3 Patterson DA, "Spontaneous vaginal delivery" 78 : 336-341, 2008

      4 Schaupp KL, "Saddle block and caudal block analgesia for the control of pain in labor" 70 : 211-215, 1949

      5 Yarnell RW, "Sacralization of epidural block with repeated doses of 0.25% bupivacaine during labor" 15 : 275-279, 1990

      6 Halpern SH, "Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor" 108 : 921-928, 2009

      7 Schiessl B, "Obstetrical parameters influencing the duration of the second stage of labor" 118 : 17-20, 2005

      8 Chadwick HS, "Obstetric anesthesia - then and now" 71 : 517-520, 2005

      9 Mayberry LJ, "Neilson- Smith K. Managing second-stage labor" 3 : 28-34, 1999

      10 Plunkett BA, "Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia" 102 : 109-114, 2003

      1 Bates RG, "Uterine activity in the second stage of labour and the effect of epidural analgesia" 92 : 1246-1250, 1985

      2 Segal S, "The effect of a rapid change in availability of epidural analgesia on the cesarean delivery rate: A meta-analysis" 183 : 974-978, 2000

      3 Patterson DA, "Spontaneous vaginal delivery" 78 : 336-341, 2008

      4 Schaupp KL, "Saddle block and caudal block analgesia for the control of pain in labor" 70 : 211-215, 1949

      5 Yarnell RW, "Sacralization of epidural block with repeated doses of 0.25% bupivacaine during labor" 15 : 275-279, 1990

      6 Halpern SH, "Patient-controlled epidural analgesia for labor" 108 : 921-928, 2009

      7 Schiessl B, "Obstetrical parameters influencing the duration of the second stage of labor" 118 : 17-20, 2005

      8 Chadwick HS, "Obstetric anesthesia - then and now" 71 : 517-520, 2005

      9 Mayberry LJ, "Neilson- Smith K. Managing second-stage labor" 3 : 28-34, 1999

      10 Plunkett BA, "Management of the second stage of labor in nulliparas with continuous epidural analgesia" 102 : 109-114, 2003

      11 Marmer MJ, "Lidocaine-norepinephrine anesthesia in obstetrics; xylocaine and levelophed combination in caudal block" 7 : 315-318, 1956

      12 Moeller-Bertram T, "Labor analgesia in a parturient with prior Harrington rod instrumentation: is caudal epidural an option?" 23 : 925-926, 2004

      13 Sinclair JC, "Intoxication of the fetus by a local anesthetic. A newly recognized complication of maternal caudal anesthesia" 273 : 1173-1177, 1965

      14 Anim-Somuah M, "Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour"

      15 Breen TW, "Epidural anesthesia for labor in an ambulatory patient" 77 : 919-924, 1993

      16 Sah N, "Efficacy of ropivacaine, bupivacaine, and levobupivacaine for labor epidural analgesia" 19 : 214-217, 2007

      17 Kang YI, "Effect of Continuous Epidural Analgesia on the Progress of Labor" 39 : 183-188, 2000

      18 Zhang J, "Does epidural analgesia prolong labor and increase risk of cesarean delivery? A natural experiment" 185 : 128-134, 2001

      19 Torvaldsen S, "Discontinuation of epidural analgesia late in labour for reducing the adverse delivery outcomes associated with epidural analgesia"

      20 Yang WC, "Conventional Intermittent "Top-up" Injections of 0.25% Bupivacaine/Fentanyl vs 0.125% Bupivacaine/Fentanyl during Labor" 35 : 467-472, 1998

      21 Meehan FP, "Continuous caudal analgesia in obstetrics" 62 : 185-186, 1969

      22 Sudunagunta S, "Continuous caudal analgesia in labour for a patient with Harrington rods" 7 : 128-130, 1998

      23 Paech MJ, "Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: a prospective analysis of 10,995 cases" 7 : 5-11, 1998

      24 Boutros A, "Comparison of intermittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labor" 8 : 236-241, 1999

      25 Cibils LA, "Caudal analgesia in first-stage labor:effect on uterine activity and the cardiovascular system" 84 : 1042-1050, 1962

      26 Abouleish E, "Caudal analgesia for quadruplet delivery" 55 : 61-66, 1976

      27 Dennerstein G, "Caudal analgesia by the obstetrician" 30 : 203-205, 1990

      28 Brancato RM, "A meta-analysis of passive descent versus immediate pushing in nulliparous women with epidural analgesia in the second stage of labor" 37 : 4-12, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2027 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2021-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2018-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2015-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재후보
      2013-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2012-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (기타) KCI등재후보
      2011-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2009-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.13 0.13 0.12
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.13 0.13 0.279 0.04
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼