RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      조선산업 = 수출전문산업으로의 극적 전환

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      This study investigated how the Park Chung-hee Administration’s industrial promotion policy operated in the shipbuilding industry. Especially, this study analyzed how the present Korean shipbuilding industry that is not related to the domestic market, but dependent only on the export market has been formed historically in the relationships with ‘policy,’ ‘company’ or ‘industry.’
      After liberation, the successive regimes in South Korea have labored for the promotion of the shipbuilding industry. Till the 1960s, they aimed to make it an industry that can replace importation through national nancial investment and nancial support, mainly by the Korea Shipbuilding Corporation, operated by the state. However, this attempt that had lasted for more than 20 years did not succeed. The government prepared an institutional device that would make the building of ships domestically more advantageous than importing them, but it failed to raise the fund that would support this.
      In the 1970s, the Korean shipbuilding industry achieved a dramatic conversion to an export specialized industry, absolutely dependent on the export market. It took an opportunity of the construction of the Hyundai Heavy Industries Ulsan Shipyard. e prototype of the Korean shipbuilding industry like it is today was formed. But this was not a new solution to the shipbuilding policy set forth by the government, taking a lesson from the failure of making it an industry that could replace importation attempted for a long time till the 1960s. is was a result of the policy on the promotion of the military industry for the self-reliance of national defense in an unexpected situation of the emergence of a security crisis in the late 1960s. Private Enterprise, Hyundai Engineering & Construction that took charge of the construction of a shipyard of four plants to be constructed to promote the military industry of four plants almost by force promoted and succeeded in constructing a large shipyard that would only build ships for exportation on the dimension of a corporate strategy to survive. The success of the Hyundai Heavy Industries was adopted as the government’s policy on the promotion of the shipbuilding industry, according to the policy on heavy chemical industrialization begun just in time. In this sense, it may be judged that the short period of years in the early 1970s, when the Hyundai Heavy Industries Ulsan Shipyard was constructed was the period in which the strategy of the private enterprise led the policy.
      번역하기

      This study investigated how the Park Chung-hee Administration’s industrial promotion policy operated in the shipbuilding industry. Especially, this study analyzed how the present Korean shipbuilding industry that is not related to the domestic marke...

      This study investigated how the Park Chung-hee Administration’s industrial promotion policy operated in the shipbuilding industry. Especially, this study analyzed how the present Korean shipbuilding industry that is not related to the domestic market, but dependent only on the export market has been formed historically in the relationships with ‘policy,’ ‘company’ or ‘industry.’
      After liberation, the successive regimes in South Korea have labored for the promotion of the shipbuilding industry. Till the 1960s, they aimed to make it an industry that can replace importation through national nancial investment and nancial support, mainly by the Korea Shipbuilding Corporation, operated by the state. However, this attempt that had lasted for more than 20 years did not succeed. The government prepared an institutional device that would make the building of ships domestically more advantageous than importing them, but it failed to raise the fund that would support this.
      In the 1970s, the Korean shipbuilding industry achieved a dramatic conversion to an export specialized industry, absolutely dependent on the export market. It took an opportunity of the construction of the Hyundai Heavy Industries Ulsan Shipyard. e prototype of the Korean shipbuilding industry like it is today was formed. But this was not a new solution to the shipbuilding policy set forth by the government, taking a lesson from the failure of making it an industry that could replace importation attempted for a long time till the 1960s. is was a result of the policy on the promotion of the military industry for the self-reliance of national defense in an unexpected situation of the emergence of a security crisis in the late 1960s. Private Enterprise, Hyundai Engineering & Construction that took charge of the construction of a shipyard of four plants to be constructed to promote the military industry of four plants almost by force promoted and succeeded in constructing a large shipyard that would only build ships for exportation on the dimension of a corporate strategy to survive. The success of the Hyundai Heavy Industries was adopted as the government’s policy on the promotion of the shipbuilding industry, according to the policy on heavy chemical industrialization begun just in time. In this sense, it may be judged that the short period of years in the early 1970s, when the Hyundai Heavy Industries Ulsan Shipyard was constructed was the period in which the strategy of the private enterprise led the policy.

      더보기

      목차 (Table of Contents)

      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 전사(前史): 이승만 정권기 수입대체 육성의 시행착오
      • 3. 1960년대: 국가 주도 육성 정책의 강화를 통한 수입대체 재시도
      • 4. 1970년대: 수입대체 포기와 수출전문산업화
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 1. 머리말
      • 2. 전사(前史): 이승만 정권기 수입대체 육성의 시행착오
      • 3. 1960년대: 국가 주도 육성 정책의 강화를 통한 수입대체 재시도
      • 4. 1970년대: 수입대체 포기와 수출전문산업화
      • 5. 맺음말
      • 참고문헌
      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 배석만, "현대중공업의 초창기 조선기술 도입과 정착과정 연구" 한국경영사학회 26 (26): 181-214, 2011

      2 현대중공업주식회사, "현대중공업사" 1992

      3 오원철, "한국형경제건설 7. 내가 전쟁을 하자는 것도 아니지 않느냐" 한국형경제정책연구소 1999

      4 중화학공업추진위원회기획단, "한국공업화발전에 관한 조사연구 III. 정책결정 과정의 이면사" 1979

      5 배석만, "한국 중화학공업화와 사회의 변화" 대한민국역사박물관 2014

      6 배석만, "한국 조선산업사―일제시기편" 선인 2014

      7 재무부재무정책국자금시장과, "출자관계" 국가기록원 1963

      8 경제기획원, "청구권자금백서" 1976

      9 한국조선공업협동조합, "조선조합50년사" 1998

      10 "조선공업진흥기본계획 (상공부고시 제6159호)"

      1 배석만, "현대중공업의 초창기 조선기술 도입과 정착과정 연구" 한국경영사학회 26 (26): 181-214, 2011

      2 현대중공업주식회사, "현대중공업사" 1992

      3 오원철, "한국형경제건설 7. 내가 전쟁을 하자는 것도 아니지 않느냐" 한국형경제정책연구소 1999

      4 중화학공업추진위원회기획단, "한국공업화발전에 관한 조사연구 III. 정책결정 과정의 이면사" 1979

      5 배석만, "한국 중화학공업화와 사회의 변화" 대한민국역사박물관 2014

      6 배석만, "한국 조선산업사―일제시기편" 선인 2014

      7 재무부재무정책국자금시장과, "출자관계" 국가기록원 1963

      8 경제기획원, "청구권자금백서" 1976

      9 한국조선공업협동조합, "조선조합50년사" 1998

      10 "조선공업진흥기본계획 (상공부고시 제6159호)"

      11 "조선공업진흥기본계획 (상공부고시 제5680호)"

      12 "조선공업진흥기본계획 (상공부고시 제5103호)"

      13 "조선공업진흥기본계획 (상공부고시 제4660호)"

      14 기획조정실, "제1차 경제개발 5개년계획 평가보고서(평가교수단) 1962~1966" 1967

      15 商工部, "장기조선공업진흥계획―대조선지역설정안" 1973

      16 한국선박연구소, "우리나라 造船工業發達史" 1978

      17 "매일경제신문"

      18 "동아일보"

      19 대한조선공사, "대한조선공사30년사" 1968

      20 대통령비서실, "대일청구권자금에 의한 어선 도입 촉진 대책" 국가기록원 1967

      21 "대선조선주식회사 홈페이지"

      22 "국제신보"

      23 과학기술처, "과학기술연감" 1969

      24 과학기술처, "과학기술연감" 1971

      25 "경향신문"

      26 裵錫滿, "韓国経済発展への経路―解放·戦争·復興" 日本経済評論社 2013

      27 "釜山日報"

      28 어업협력관실, "請求權資金事業" 국가기록원 1968

      29 財務部 聯合淸算事務局, "法人臺帳"

      30 대통령비서실, "大韓造船公社Fy68 緊急所要資金支援措置에 대한 보고" 국가기록원 1968

      31 박영구, "4대핵공장사업의 과정과 성격, 1969.11-1971.11" 경제사학회 44 : 81-107, 2008

      32 박영구, "1971년의 한국 현대조선공업 시작은 정말 어떠하였는가?" 한국민족문화연구소 (61) : 431-462, 2016

      33 裵錫滿, "1970年代初頭現代グループの造船工業参入過程の分析―韓国経済開発期における国家と民間企業の役割に関する再検討" 7 : 2007

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2008-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2005-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2002-01-01 평가 등재후보학술지 유지 (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      1999-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.09 1.09 0.95
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.85 0.85 1.637 0.53
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼