RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재

      3분기말까지 누적소폭이익 기업의 연차보고이익 분포의 특성 -이익유연화를 중심으로- = The Annual Earnings Distribution's Characteristics in Small Cumulative Profits Firms at the End of the Third Quarter -Focused on the Income Smoothing-

      한글로보기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract) kakao i 다국어 번역

      Prior research examines whether firms manage earnings to meet or beat certain benchmarks (e.g., profitability, earnings increases, and analysts’ forecasts). Building on the results of Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) show that there is a large discontinuity, or kink, in the annual earnings distribution around zero. Degeorge et al. (1999) find similar evidence using quarterly earnings distributions. Also, prior research examines whether manage earnings the fourth quarter earnings to use the last chance to meet or beat certain benchmarks. Specifically, prior research examines whether firms that unmanaged earnings are small loss of the cumulative earnings distribution at the end of the first three quarters report small profits annual earnings to avoid negative earnings surprises by managing the fourth quarter earnings (Kerstein and Rai 2007 ; Park and Jeon 2010).
      Whereas, we investigates whether firms with small cumulative profits at the beginning of the fourth-quarter manage fourth quarter earnings to income smoothing. We argue that such firms are the most likely not to manage earnings upward or downward, still at the stay. One particular manifestation of earnings management is smoothing or managing reported earnings to achieve a certain earnings targets across accounting periods. Tucker and Zarowin (2006) report that the changes in the current stock prices of higher smoothing firms contain more information about these firms’ future earnings than do the changes in the current stock prices of lower smoothing firms. Taken collectively this study support the notion that income smoothing represents an efficient vehicle for managers to reveal private information.
      We then test whether firms shift abnormally within the fourth-quarter earnings distribution to achieve annual profits corresponding to the smallest profit level considered. Further, we extend the earnings distribution approach to identifying earnings management by examining changes to the earnings distribution, not just the earnings distribution itself, and also extends Kerstein and Rai (2007).
      Our logistic regression results provide strong evidence that firms with the smallest cumulative profits (small profits level at the end of the third-quarter, unmanaged earnings are small profits more than prior year earnings at the end of the third-quarter, and unmanaged earnings are small beating profits more than analyst’s forecasts at the september) also report the smallest annual profits at an abnormally high rate in order to income smoothing. That is, for the benefit of the firms contains more private information about their future earnings. Overall, our results show that compared to a control group (large cumulative profits or small cumulative losses at the first three quarter), a high proportion of firms with small cumulative profits at the beginning of the fourthquarter report small annual profits rather than large annual profits or small annual losses. Therefore, our study contributes to the earnings management literature.
      번역하기

      Prior research examines whether firms manage earnings to meet or beat certain benchmarks (e.g., profitability, earnings increases, and analysts’ forecasts). Building on the results of Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) show that there is a large disconti...

      Prior research examines whether firms manage earnings to meet or beat certain benchmarks (e.g., profitability, earnings increases, and analysts’ forecasts). Building on the results of Burgstahler and Dichev (1997) show that there is a large discontinuity, or kink, in the annual earnings distribution around zero. Degeorge et al. (1999) find similar evidence using quarterly earnings distributions. Also, prior research examines whether manage earnings the fourth quarter earnings to use the last chance to meet or beat certain benchmarks. Specifically, prior research examines whether firms that unmanaged earnings are small loss of the cumulative earnings distribution at the end of the first three quarters report small profits annual earnings to avoid negative earnings surprises by managing the fourth quarter earnings (Kerstein and Rai 2007 ; Park and Jeon 2010).
      Whereas, we investigates whether firms with small cumulative profits at the beginning of the fourth-quarter manage fourth quarter earnings to income smoothing. We argue that such firms are the most likely not to manage earnings upward or downward, still at the stay. One particular manifestation of earnings management is smoothing or managing reported earnings to achieve a certain earnings targets across accounting periods. Tucker and Zarowin (2006) report that the changes in the current stock prices of higher smoothing firms contain more information about these firms’ future earnings than do the changes in the current stock prices of lower smoothing firms. Taken collectively this study support the notion that income smoothing represents an efficient vehicle for managers to reveal private information.
      We then test whether firms shift abnormally within the fourth-quarter earnings distribution to achieve annual profits corresponding to the smallest profit level considered. Further, we extend the earnings distribution approach to identifying earnings management by examining changes to the earnings distribution, not just the earnings distribution itself, and also extends Kerstein and Rai (2007).
      Our logistic regression results provide strong evidence that firms with the smallest cumulative profits (small profits level at the end of the third-quarter, unmanaged earnings are small profits more than prior year earnings at the end of the third-quarter, and unmanaged earnings are small beating profits more than analyst’s forecasts at the september) also report the smallest annual profits at an abnormally high rate in order to income smoothing. That is, for the benefit of the firms contains more private information about their future earnings. Overall, our results show that compared to a control group (large cumulative profits or small cumulative losses at the first three quarter), a high proportion of firms with small cumulative profits at the beginning of the fourthquarter report small annual profits rather than large annual profits or small annual losses. Therefore, our study contributes to the earnings management literature.

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 송인만, "적자보고를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 29-52, 2004

      2 송인만, "분기별 이익조정의 형태: 적자회피와 반전현상" 한국회계학회 33 (33): 1-28, 2008

      3 박종일, "부정적인 어닝 서프라이즈를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계정보학회 28 (28): 135-174, 2010

      4 박종일, "목표이익을 달성하기 위한 법인세비용을 이용한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 34 (34): 171-206, 2009

      5 박종일, "기업지배구조와 이익조정: 최대주주 지분율을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 135-172, 2003

      6 박종일, "감사인 교체와 감사품질" 한국공인회계사회 (46) : 191-226, 2007

      7 Dechow,P, "Understanding earnings quality:A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences" (50) : 344-401, 2010

      8 Subramanyam,K.R, "The pricing of discretionary accruals" (22) : 249-281, 1996

      9 Healy,P, "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions" 7 (7): 85-107, 1985

      10 Becker,C, "The effect of audit quality on earnings management" (15) : 1-24, 1998

      1 송인만, "적자보고를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 13 (13): 29-52, 2004

      2 송인만, "분기별 이익조정의 형태: 적자회피와 반전현상" 한국회계학회 33 (33): 1-28, 2008

      3 박종일, "부정적인 어닝 서프라이즈를 회피하기 위한 이익조정" 한국회계정보학회 28 (28): 135-174, 2010

      4 박종일, "목표이익을 달성하기 위한 법인세비용을 이용한 이익조정" 한국회계학회 34 (34): 171-206, 2009

      5 박종일, "기업지배구조와 이익조정: 최대주주 지분율을 중심으로" 한국회계학회 28 (28): 135-172, 2003

      6 박종일, "감사인 교체와 감사품질" 한국공인회계사회 (46) : 191-226, 2007

      7 Dechow,P, "Understanding earnings quality:A review of the proxies, their determinants and their consequences" (50) : 344-401, 2010

      8 Subramanyam,K.R, "The pricing of discretionary accruals" (22) : 249-281, 1996

      9 Healy,P, "The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions" 7 (7): 85-107, 1985

      10 Becker,C, "The effect of audit quality on earnings management" (15) : 1-24, 1998

      11 Graham,J, "The economic implications of corporate financial reporting" (40) : 3-73, 2005

      12 Choi, J.H, "The Association between Audit Quality and Fees Paid to Audit Firms:Revisited. Working Paper" Seoul National University 2009

      13 Ronen,J, "Smoothing income numbers:Objectives, means, and implications" Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley Publishing Company 1981

      14 Tversky,A, "Prospect theory:An analysis of decision under risk" (47) : 263-292, 1979

      15 Kasznik,R, "On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management" (37) : 57-821, 1999

      16 Tversky,A, "Loss aversion in riskless choice:A reference-dependence model" (106) : 1039-1061, 1991

      17 Dhaliwal,D.S, "Last-chance earnings management:Using the tax expense to meet analyst’s forecasts" 21 (21): 431-459, 2004

      18 Leuz,C, "Investor protection and earnings management" 69 (69): 505-527, 2003

      19 Kerstein,J, "Intra-year shifts in the earnings distribution and their implications for earnings management" (44) : 399-419, 2007

      20 Li,S.and N.Richie, "Income smoothing and the cost of debt" Wilfrid Laurier University 2009

      21 Conroy,R.A, "Fundamental information and share prices in Japan :Evidence from earnings surprises and management prediction" (14) : 227-244, 1998

      22 Das,S, "Fourth quarter reversals in earnings changes and management" University of Illinois at Chicago 2002

      23 Myers,J, "Exploring the term of the auditor-client relationship and the quality of earnings:A case for mandatory auditor rotation" 78 (78): 779-800, 2003

      24 Hunt, A, "Earnings volatility, earnings management, and equity value. Working paper" University of Washington 2000

      25 Allayannis G, "Earnings volatility, cash flow volatility and firm value. Working paper" University of Virginia & Rice University 2005

      26 Myers,L, "Earnings momentum and earnings Management" University of Michigan 2002

      27 Degeorge,F, "Earnings management to exceed thresholds" (72) : 1-33, 1999

      28 Burgstahler,D, "Earnings management to avoid earnings decreases and losses" (24) : 99-126, 1997

      29 Dye,R, "Earnings management in an overlapping generations model" (26) : 195-235, 1988

      30 Chaney P, "Earnings management and firm valuation under asymmetric information" (1) : 319-345, 1995

      31 Tucker,J, "Does income smoothing improve earnings informativeness" (81) : 251-270, 2006

      32 Ashbaugh,H, "Do non-Audit services compromise auditor independence" (78) : 611-639, 2003

      33 Dechow,P, "Detecting earnings management" (70) : 193-225, 1995

      34 Francis,J, "Costs of equity and earnings attributes" (79) : 967-1010, 2004

      35 Levis,M, "Contrarian strategies and investor expectations:the UK evidence" 57 (57): 43-56, 2001

      36 DeFond,M, "Auditor changes and discretionary accruals" (25) : 35-67, 1998

      37 Holthausen,R, "Annual bonus schemes and the manipulation of earnings" (19) : 29-74, 1995

      38 Trueman,B, "An explanation for accounting income smoothing" (26) : 127-139, 1988

      39 Gaver,J.J, "Additional evidence on bonus plans and income management" (19) : 3-28, 1995

      40 Barnes,R, "Accounting volatility and market valuation:An empirical investigation" London Business School 2001

      41 Fudenberg,D, "A theory of income and dividend smoothing based on incumbency rents" 103 (103): 75-93, 1995

      42 박종찬, "4분기와 1~3분기 중간이익의 차별적 특성: 재량적 발생과 이익예측성" 한국회계학회 32 (32): 91-115, 2007

      43 백원선, "4분기 이익조정과 이익지속성" 한국회계학회 33 (33): 111-144, 2008

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2026 평가예정 재인증평가 신청대상 (재인증)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (재인증) KCI등재
      2017-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (계속평가) KCI등재
      2013-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2006-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2004-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 1.23 1.23 1.14
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      1.29 1.2 2.08 0.23
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼