RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      KCI등재 SCOPUS SCIE

      무릎관절치환술 후 경막외통증조절시 0.15 Ropivacaine과 0.1 Levobupivacaine의 효과 비교 = Comparison of 0.15% Ropivacaine/Fentanyl and 0.1% Levobupivacaine/Fentanyl Infused for Postoperative Epidural Analgesia

      한글로보기

      https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104350481

      • 0

        상세조회
      • 0

        다운로드
      서지정보 열기
      • 내보내기
      • 내책장담기
      • 공유하기
      • 오류접수

      부가정보

      다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)

      Background: In this study we compared the analgesic effects and the incidences of motor weakness and other side effects of postoperative continuous epidural infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl or 0.1% levobupivacaine/fentanyl. Methods: Sixty s...

      Background: In this study we compared the analgesic effects and the incidences of motor weakness and other side effects of postoperative continuous epidural infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl or 0.1% levobupivacaine/fentanyl.
      Methods: Sixty seven patients scheduled for elective knee arthroplasty or revision surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive either 0.15% ropivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl (the ropivacaine group) or 0.1% levobupivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl (the levobupivacaine group) for postoperative epidural analgesia using a PCA pump at a rate of 5 ml/h during the 48 hour period following surgery. Verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) scores on rest and movement, Bromage scores, additional analgesic requirements and side effects were assessed.
      Results: In the ropivacaine group, rest VNRS scores were lower than in the levobupivacaine group on the second postoperative day, and movement VNRS scores were also lower in the ropivacaine group during the first and second postoperative days. Bromage scores, additional analgesic requirements and side effects were similar in the two groups.
      Conclusions: Both 0.15% ropivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl and 0.1% levobupivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl provided effective postoperative epidural analgesia, but ropivacaine group members were able to exercise more effectively. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2006; 50: 77~83)

      더보기

      참고문헌 (Reference)

      1 Capogna G, "Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour" 82 : 371-373, 1999

      2 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 90 : 944-950, 1999

      3 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 99 : 1354-1358, 2003

      4 The Korean Pain Society, "Pain medicine. 2nd ed" Seoul,Koonja Publishing Inc 283-304, 2000

      5 Lee YC, "Local anesthetics" Koonja Publishing Inc 1371-1396, 2002

      6 D'Angelo R, "Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine?" 90 : 941-943, 1999

      7 Casati A, "Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine" 15 : 126-131, 2003

      8 Camorcia M, "Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine:determination of ED50 motor block after spinal administration" 92 : 850-853, 2004

      9 Lyons G, "Epidural pain relief in labour:potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine" 81 : 899-901, 1998

      10 Senard M,, "Epidural levobupivacaine 0.1% or ropivacaine 0.1% combined with morphine provides comparable analgesia after abdominal surgery" 98 : 389-394, 2004

      1 Capogna G, "Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour" 82 : 371-373, 1999

      2 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 90 : 944-950, 1999

      3 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 99 : 1354-1358, 2003

      4 The Korean Pain Society, "Pain medicine. 2nd ed" Seoul,Koonja Publishing Inc 283-304, 2000

      5 Lee YC, "Local anesthetics" Koonja Publishing Inc 1371-1396, 2002

      6 D'Angelo R, "Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine?" 90 : 941-943, 1999

      7 Casati A, "Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine" 15 : 126-131, 2003

      8 Camorcia M, "Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine:determination of ED50 motor block after spinal administration" 92 : 850-853, 2004

      9 Lyons G, "Epidural pain relief in labour:potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine" 81 : 899-901, 1998

      10 Senard M,, "Epidural levobupivacaine 0.1% or ropivacaine 0.1% combined with morphine provides comparable analgesia after abdominal surgery" 98 : 389-394, 2004

      11 Cl ment HJ,, "Epidural analgesia with 0 a double-blind comparison during labor" 88 : 809-813, 2002

      12 Wu CL, "Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality following surgery in medicare patients" 29 : 525-533, 2004

      13 Purdie NL, "Comparison of patient-controlled epidural bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.1% levobupivacaine, both with 0.0002% fentanyl, for analgesia during labour." 59 : 133-137, 2004

      14 Kim DH, "Anesthesia." Koonja Publi-shing Inc 1463-1485, 2002

      15 Benhamou D, "A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor" 99 : 1383-1386, 2003

      16 Fern ndez-Guisasola J, "A comparison of 0 0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0 1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia" 92 : 1261-1265, 2001

      17 Supandji M, "0.2% ropivacaine and levobupivacaine provide equally effective epidural labour analgesia" 51 : 918-922, 2004

      더보기

      동일학술지(권/호) 다른 논문

      동일학술지 더보기

      더보기

      분석정보

      View

      상세정보조회

      0

      Usage

      원문다운로드

      0

      대출신청

      0

      복사신청

      0

      EDDS신청

      0

      동일 주제 내 활용도 TOP

      더보기

      주제

      연도별 연구동향

      연도별 활용동향

      연관논문

      연구자 네트워크맵

      공동연구자 (7)

      유사연구자 (20) 활용도상위20명

      인용정보 인용지수 설명보기

      학술지 이력

      학술지 이력
      연월일 이력구분 이력상세 등재구분
      2023 평가예정 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가)
      2020-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) KCI등재
      2013-11-27 학회명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 KCI등재
      2011-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2010-07-20 학술지명변경 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology KCI등재
      2009-01-01 평가 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) KCI등재
      2007-01-01 평가 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) KCI등재
      2004-01-01 평가 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) KCI등재
      2003-01-01 평가 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) KCI등재후보
      2001-07-01 평가 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) KCI등재후보
      더보기

      학술지 인용정보

      학술지 인용정보
      기준연도 WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) KCIF(2년) KCIF(3년)
      2016 0.09 0.09 0.1
      KCIF(4년) KCIF(5년) 중심성지수(3년) 즉시성지수
      0.09 0.09 0.27 0.01
      더보기

      이 자료와 함께 이용한 RISS 자료

      나만을 위한 추천자료

      해외이동버튼