Background: In this study we compared the analgesic effects and the incidences of motor weakness and other side effects of postoperative continuous epidural infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl or 0.1% levobupivacaine/fentanyl. Methods: Sixty s...
http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
https://www.riss.kr/link?id=A104350481
2006
-
KCI등재,SCOPUS,SCIE
학술저널
77-83(7쪽)
1
0
상세조회0
다운로드다국어 초록 (Multilingual Abstract)
Background: In this study we compared the analgesic effects and the incidences of motor weakness and other side effects of postoperative continuous epidural infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl or 0.1% levobupivacaine/fentanyl. Methods: Sixty s...
Background: In this study we compared the analgesic effects and the incidences of motor weakness and other side effects of postoperative continuous epidural infusion of 0.15% ropivacaine/fentanyl or 0.1% levobupivacaine/fentanyl.
Methods: Sixty seven patients scheduled for elective knee arthroplasty or revision surgery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were randomized to receive either 0.15% ropivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl (the ropivacaine group) or 0.1% levobupivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl (the levobupivacaine group) for postoperative epidural analgesia using a PCA pump at a rate of 5 ml/h during the 48 hour period following surgery. Verbal numerical rating scale (VNRS) scores on rest and movement, Bromage scores, additional analgesic requirements and side effects were assessed.
Results: In the ropivacaine group, rest VNRS scores were lower than in the levobupivacaine group on the second postoperative day, and movement VNRS scores were also lower in the ropivacaine group during the first and second postoperative days. Bromage scores, additional analgesic requirements and side effects were similar in the two groups.
Conclusions: Both 0.15% ropivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl and 0.1% levobupivacaine with 2μg/ml fentanyl provided effective postoperative epidural analgesia, but ropivacaine group members were able to exercise more effectively. (Korean J Anesthesiol 2006; 50: 77~83)
참고문헌 (Reference)
1 Capogna G, "Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour" 82 : 371-373, 1999
2 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 90 : 944-950, 1999
3 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 99 : 1354-1358, 2003
4 The Korean Pain Society, "Pain medicine. 2nd ed" Seoul,Koonja Publishing Inc 283-304, 2000
5 Lee YC, "Local anesthetics" Koonja Publishing Inc 1371-1396, 2002
6 D'Angelo R, "Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine?" 90 : 941-943, 1999
7 Casati A, "Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine" 15 : 126-131, 2003
8 Camorcia M, "Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine:determination of ED50 motor block after spinal administration" 92 : 850-853, 2004
9 Lyons G, "Epidural pain relief in labour:potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine" 81 : 899-901, 1998
10 Senard M,, "Epidural levobupivacaine 0.1% or ropivacaine 0.1% combined with morphine provides comparable analgesia after abdominal surgery" 98 : 389-394, 2004
1 Capogna G, "Relative potencies of bupivacaine and ropivacaine for analgesia in labour" 82 : 371-373, 1999
2 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of ropivacaine and bupivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 90 : 944-950, 1999
3 Polley LS, "Relative analgesic potencies of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine for epidural analgesia in labor" 99 : 1354-1358, 2003
4 The Korean Pain Society, "Pain medicine. 2nd ed" Seoul,Koonja Publishing Inc 283-304, 2000
5 Lee YC, "Local anesthetics" Koonja Publishing Inc 1371-1396, 2002
6 D'Angelo R, "Is ropivacaine less potent than bupivacaine?" 90 : 941-943, 1999
7 Casati A, "Intraoperative epidural anesthesia and postoperative analgesia with levobupivacaine for major orthopedic surgery randomized comparison of racemic bupivacaine and ropivacaine" 15 : 126-131, 2003
8 Camorcia M, "Epidural test dose with levobupivacaine and ropivacaine:determination of ED50 motor block after spinal administration" 92 : 850-853, 2004
9 Lyons G, "Epidural pain relief in labour:potencies of levobupivacaine and racemic bupivacaine" 81 : 899-901, 1998
10 Senard M,, "Epidural levobupivacaine 0.1% or ropivacaine 0.1% combined with morphine provides comparable analgesia after abdominal surgery" 98 : 389-394, 2004
11 Cl ment HJ,, "Epidural analgesia with 0 a double-blind comparison during labor" 88 : 809-813, 2002
12 Wu CL, "Effect of postoperative epidural analgesia on morbidity and mortality following surgery in medicare patients" 29 : 525-533, 2004
13 Purdie NL, "Comparison of patient-controlled epidural bolus administration of 0.1% ropivacaine and 0.1% levobupivacaine, both with 0.0002% fentanyl, for analgesia during labour." 59 : 133-137, 2004
14 Kim DH, "Anesthesia." Koonja Publi-shing Inc 1463-1485, 2002
15 Benhamou D, "A randomized sequential allocation study to determine the minimum effective analgesic concentration of levobupivacaine and ropivacaine in patients receiving epidural analgesia for labor" 99 : 1383-1386, 2003
16 Fern ndez-Guisasola J, "A comparison of 0 0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0 1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia" 92 : 1261-1265, 2001
17 Supandji M, "0.2% ropivacaine and levobupivacaine provide equally effective epidural labour analgesia" 51 : 918-922, 2004
Propofol-Alfentanil 마취 시 혈역학적 변동을 최소화하기 위한 Ephedrine의 적정량
근이완제에 교차감작된 환자에서 복강경 수술의 마취 경험
담낭암 환자에서 발생한 견갑골과 흉배부 통증의 치료경험
경막외 Clonidine은 BIS 50 유지에 필요한 Sevoflurane 농도를 감소시키는가?
학술지 이력
연월일 | 이력구분 | 이력상세 | 등재구분 |
---|---|---|---|
2023 | 평가예정 | 해외DB학술지평가 신청대상 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2020-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (해외등재 학술지 평가) | |
2013-11-27 | 학회명변경 | 한글명 : 대한마취과학회 -> 대한마취통증의학회 | |
2011-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2010-07-20 | 학술지명변경 | 한글명 : 대한마취과학회지 -> Korean Journal of Anesthesiology | |
2009-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 유지 (등재유지) | |
2007-01-01 | 평가 | 등재 1차 FAIL (등재유지) | |
2004-01-01 | 평가 | 등재학술지 선정 (등재후보2차) | |
2003-01-01 | 평가 | 등재후보 1차 PASS (등재후보1차) | |
2001-07-01 | 평가 | 등재후보학술지 선정 (신규평가) |
학술지 인용정보
기준연도 | WOS-KCI 통합IF(2년) | KCIF(2년) | KCIF(3년) |
---|---|---|---|
2016 | 0.09 | 0.09 | 0.1 |
KCIF(4년) | KCIF(5년) | 중심성지수(3년) | 즉시성지수 |
0.09 | 0.09 | 0.27 | 0.01 |